![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Trying to understand why we can't add anything here.
Does it not make sense that police must be trained and certified in every tool they use in their profession? If they just make up sobriety test other than the "Standardized Field Sobriety Test" [1] [2] , then a DUI arrest resulting from such could be thrown out of court. Police have to be properly trained and certified in that test. I have the certification to prove that I went through that, just as every state certified peace officer should have.
Likewise, they must be trained in the use of hand-cuffs, batons and sprays. Each of those things requires a certification.
The MDTS (Monadnock Defensive Tactics System) [3] [4] includes unarmed hand-to-hand fighting, as well as tactical applications for the baton, PR-24, hand-cuffs (and pat-down/ search methods employed as part of cuffing), and weapon retention (defending against an attempted grab of any weapon on the person of the officer). It is a requirement for officers going through academies... and I taught it, and still have the physical certifications from both the state and the MPTC to prove it.
Why are you all so aversive to new information being shared?
"Live well. Die well. Pass on virtue to all you meet." 00:39, 8 October 2012 (UTC)Tengu16
***************
Guess it's time to call a lawyer.
"Live well. Die well. Pass on virtue to all you meet." 21:59, 10 October 2012 (UTC)Tengu16 — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Tengu16 (
talk •
contribs)
Thanks. Hope you stick with it. Poekoelan ( talk) 13:45, 11 October 2012 (UTC)Poekoelan
Thanks for that, Legitimus. That's the way we all should be here, cooperating and helping each other. Not tearing each other apart over petty styles and format rules. Let's see if we can promote that spirit of cooperation and assistance to others within the Wiki communities. "Live well. Die well. Pass on virtue to all you meet." 16:51, 13 October 2012 (UTC)Tengu16
Poekoelan ( talk) 22:55, 12 October 2012 (UTC)Poekoelan
I didn't read any "attitude" in any of that rant. More of a Platonic questioning manner of guidance that is supposed to be the ideal in law and investigations. We call it "open-ended" questions, but most lawyers end up using "closed" and "limited" (leading) questions to get what they want (rather than reach the truth, or even legal ideal of "totality of the circumstances"). Guy here was probably just blowing steam, directing it at Wiki-land censors in the form of passive aggressive venting.
However, "perception is nine-tenths of reality", as we used to say when teaching about harassment and culturasl sensitivity. They may still say it.
Thanks again for helping with the article.
"Live well. Die well. Pass on virtue to all you meet." 16:51, 13 October 2012 (UTC)Tengu16
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Trying to understand why we can't add anything here.
Does it not make sense that police must be trained and certified in every tool they use in their profession? If they just make up sobriety test other than the "Standardized Field Sobriety Test" [1] [2] , then a DUI arrest resulting from such could be thrown out of court. Police have to be properly trained and certified in that test. I have the certification to prove that I went through that, just as every state certified peace officer should have.
Likewise, they must be trained in the use of hand-cuffs, batons and sprays. Each of those things requires a certification.
The MDTS (Monadnock Defensive Tactics System) [3] [4] includes unarmed hand-to-hand fighting, as well as tactical applications for the baton, PR-24, hand-cuffs (and pat-down/ search methods employed as part of cuffing), and weapon retention (defending against an attempted grab of any weapon on the person of the officer). It is a requirement for officers going through academies... and I taught it, and still have the physical certifications from both the state and the MPTC to prove it.
Why are you all so aversive to new information being shared?
"Live well. Die well. Pass on virtue to all you meet." 00:39, 8 October 2012 (UTC)Tengu16
***************
Guess it's time to call a lawyer.
"Live well. Die well. Pass on virtue to all you meet." 21:59, 10 October 2012 (UTC)Tengu16 — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Tengu16 (
talk •
contribs)
Thanks. Hope you stick with it. Poekoelan ( talk) 13:45, 11 October 2012 (UTC)Poekoelan
Thanks for that, Legitimus. That's the way we all should be here, cooperating and helping each other. Not tearing each other apart over petty styles and format rules. Let's see if we can promote that spirit of cooperation and assistance to others within the Wiki communities. "Live well. Die well. Pass on virtue to all you meet." 16:51, 13 October 2012 (UTC)Tengu16
Poekoelan ( talk) 22:55, 12 October 2012 (UTC)Poekoelan
I didn't read any "attitude" in any of that rant. More of a Platonic questioning manner of guidance that is supposed to be the ideal in law and investigations. We call it "open-ended" questions, but most lawyers end up using "closed" and "limited" (leading) questions to get what they want (rather than reach the truth, or even legal ideal of "totality of the circumstances"). Guy here was probably just blowing steam, directing it at Wiki-land censors in the form of passive aggressive venting.
However, "perception is nine-tenths of reality", as we used to say when teaching about harassment and culturasl sensitivity. They may still say it.
Thanks again for helping with the article.
"Live well. Die well. Pass on virtue to all you meet." 16:51, 13 October 2012 (UTC)Tengu16