This article deserves GA status. It is well written, neutral, stable and well referenced with in-line citations. A few minor problems had been fixed during the review, as documented below. Materialscientist ( talk) 05:41, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Please check the dead links here and "citation needed" tags.
- Tried to get rid of all but one of them. The australian one needs more time.-- Stone ( talk) 12:43, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Removed the australian reference and added two others.-- Stone ( talk) 21:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Clarify "free oxygen" (gas, atoms, else ?)
- This is diatomic oxygen gas. -- Stone ( talk) 20:31, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Changed to oxygen. free is missleading.-- Stone ( talk) 21:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Clarify "alkaline water"
- strong base like potassium hydroxide in water-- Stone ( talk) 20:31, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Changed.-- Stone ( talk) 21:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
"reached a peak of $103,000 per tonne in June 2005" - why?
- The resposible person is not named! I think it is like always, high demand and a lot of gamblers on the stock market.-- Stone ( talk) 20:31, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- added the phrase: due to increased demand.-- Stone ( talk) 21:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Is it true that oxidation state zero is among the most stable ones ? How about 2+ (sulfides) ? This refers to bolding some values in the oxidation state table.
- Zero is stable enough if it is bulk material, but you are right it is not among the most stable ones in the lab.-- Stone ( talk) 12:43, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Changed.-- Stone ( talk) 21:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- I changed some {{chem templates into usual <sub, <sup because the formulas get split up at line break. Materialscientist ( talk) 10:02, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- This is just a hint that the info on number of Mo enzymes is obsolete in the article. Could you update that? Materialscientist ( talk) 11:15, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.03.013 gives 50 by 2002, so lets take that number. But I will try to get latest number.-- Stone ( talk) 14:20, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry I found no newer numbers. I put the numbers in from the journal mentioned above--
Stone (
talk)
03:57, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- I failed too - new articles simply re-cite old reviews. A specialist is needed here. Materialscientist ( talk) 05:41, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry I found no newer numbers. I put the numbers in from the journal mentioned above--
Stone (
talk)
03:57, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
This article deserves GA status. It is well written, neutral, stable and well referenced with in-line citations. A few minor problems had been fixed during the review, as documented below. Materialscientist ( talk) 05:41, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Please check the dead links here and "citation needed" tags.
- Tried to get rid of all but one of them. The australian one needs more time.-- Stone ( talk) 12:43, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Removed the australian reference and added two others.-- Stone ( talk) 21:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Clarify "free oxygen" (gas, atoms, else ?)
- This is diatomic oxygen gas. -- Stone ( talk) 20:31, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Changed to oxygen. free is missleading.-- Stone ( talk) 21:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Clarify "alkaline water"
- strong base like potassium hydroxide in water-- Stone ( talk) 20:31, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Changed.-- Stone ( talk) 21:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
"reached a peak of $103,000 per tonne in June 2005" - why?
- The resposible person is not named! I think it is like always, high demand and a lot of gamblers on the stock market.-- Stone ( talk) 20:31, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- added the phrase: due to increased demand.-- Stone ( talk) 21:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Is it true that oxidation state zero is among the most stable ones ? How about 2+ (sulfides) ? This refers to bolding some values in the oxidation state table.
- Zero is stable enough if it is bulk material, but you are right it is not among the most stable ones in the lab.-- Stone ( talk) 12:43, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Changed.-- Stone ( talk) 21:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- I changed some {{chem templates into usual <sub, <sup because the formulas get split up at line break. Materialscientist ( talk) 10:02, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- This is just a hint that the info on number of Mo enzymes is obsolete in the article. Could you update that? Materialscientist ( talk) 11:15, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.03.013 gives 50 by 2002, so lets take that number. But I will try to get latest number.-- Stone ( talk) 14:20, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry I found no newer numbers. I put the numbers in from the journal mentioned above--
Stone (
talk)
03:57, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- I failed too - new articles simply re-cite old reviews. A specialist is needed here. Materialscientist ( talk) 05:41, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry I found no newer numbers. I put the numbers in from the journal mentioned above--
Stone (
talk)
03:57, 7 October 2009 (UTC)