![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 December 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Not a cut and paste I am the original with peer review for acceptance privilege and right. Typically I am not into self promotion, however, please actually contribute in a positive way on this page to move this forward.
I don't agree that the DNA_Computers reference is correct or reproducible. Controllable methods in definition or refernce through authorship are not clear. Accordingly a basic level of expertise must be used to define the area of molecular processors (for use in organic and inorganic computing). Yakkov's work in Israel that came out in Nature two or three months after my talk in 2004, New Orleans, misses some major conceptual items that have been deleted from this definition.
Problems with other areas include 1- the DNA is both a template and software, in cDNA format or DNA format and may include other formats yet undefined. 2- they don't actually have a working model. Their paper review of other peoples work. 3- Hamiltons work only deals with molecular interaction through a given path. It does not deal with actuality and is in line with computational processing of ICs, though it actully talks about DNA. 4- Israels work does not provide for a strong foundation without US collaboration, overall. Provided with references I would be happy to re-review. 5- remember Einstein's work was E=hv... I mean E=mc2 where his background in fluid dynamic and particulate flow for Physicists (id his phd) studying geology might be applicable in studying molecular processes, however we have to go back to frequency components of E=hv and he gets left out. Sorry Einstein. His cousin might understand the theory of relativity.
This following definition is incorrect. You need to alter it or it will be altered:
A molecular processor is a processor that is built on a molecular scale rather than on a silicon chip integrated circuit.[1]
--/Russell Auger PhD/ 20:23, 19 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Russell Auger ( talk • contribs)
And all the knockout gene Nobel Prize winners... give it a rest for a bit. We are trying to fix all the holes that exist, let alone the new ones you try to create.
--/Russell Auger PhD/ 20:56, 19 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Russell Auger (
talk •
contribs)
what is your intent? Are you in shanghai or working for IBM in Chicago? --/Russell Auger PhD/ 21:13, 20 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Russell Auger ( talk • contribs)
I cannot. you are using this as online gaming forum. both in the chicago area on the street and online. please stop reviewing and allow other users to contribute without influence by personal communication via various channels. --/Russell Auger PhD/ 21:27, 20 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Russell Auger (
talk •
contribs)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 December 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Not a cut and paste I am the original with peer review for acceptance privilege and right. Typically I am not into self promotion, however, please actually contribute in a positive way on this page to move this forward.
I don't agree that the DNA_Computers reference is correct or reproducible. Controllable methods in definition or refernce through authorship are not clear. Accordingly a basic level of expertise must be used to define the area of molecular processors (for use in organic and inorganic computing). Yakkov's work in Israel that came out in Nature two or three months after my talk in 2004, New Orleans, misses some major conceptual items that have been deleted from this definition.
Problems with other areas include 1- the DNA is both a template and software, in cDNA format or DNA format and may include other formats yet undefined. 2- they don't actually have a working model. Their paper review of other peoples work. 3- Hamiltons work only deals with molecular interaction through a given path. It does not deal with actuality and is in line with computational processing of ICs, though it actully talks about DNA. 4- Israels work does not provide for a strong foundation without US collaboration, overall. Provided with references I would be happy to re-review. 5- remember Einstein's work was E=hv... I mean E=mc2 where his background in fluid dynamic and particulate flow for Physicists (id his phd) studying geology might be applicable in studying molecular processes, however we have to go back to frequency components of E=hv and he gets left out. Sorry Einstein. His cousin might understand the theory of relativity.
This following definition is incorrect. You need to alter it or it will be altered:
A molecular processor is a processor that is built on a molecular scale rather than on a silicon chip integrated circuit.[1]
--/Russell Auger PhD/ 20:23, 19 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Russell Auger ( talk • contribs)
And all the knockout gene Nobel Prize winners... give it a rest for a bit. We are trying to fix all the holes that exist, let alone the new ones you try to create.
--/Russell Auger PhD/ 20:56, 19 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Russell Auger (
talk •
contribs)
what is your intent? Are you in shanghai or working for IBM in Chicago? --/Russell Auger PhD/ 21:13, 20 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Russell Auger ( talk • contribs)
I cannot. you are using this as online gaming forum. both in the chicago area on the street and online. please stop reviewing and allow other users to contribute without influence by personal communication via various channels. --/Russell Auger PhD/ 21:27, 20 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Russell Auger (
talk •
contribs)