This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Moderna COVID-19 vaccine article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully. |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Moderna COVID-19 vaccine.
|
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I've reverted good faith edits by @ Myosci that mention lack of peer-reviewed scientific publications because I don't think they're necessary in the article. The data about the bivalent vaccines was reviewed by regulatory bodies, the ACIP, and CDC. See slides. While the data isn't in a journal yet, it was made public and reviewed by experts. I'm reverting similar edits on the Pfizer article. ScienceFlyer ( talk) 02:21, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
@recent deletion: It's a - certain - fact that Moderna's vaccine has been discontinued for younger people in countries like Germany, France and Sweden due to the - very likely - increased rate of myocarditis. Even if one doubts the increased rate (like many people once doubted climate change) one cannot deny the fact that vaccination has been restricted due to this concern.-- Myosci ( talk) 08:20, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Die STIKO empfiehlt für die COVID-19-Grundimmunisierung bei unter 30-Jährigen nur noch den mRNA-Impfstoff Comirnaty von BioNTech/Pfizer, da in dieser Altersgruppe das Risiko einer Myokarditis nach Impfung mit dem mRNA-Impfstoff Spikevax von Moderna höher ist als mit Comirnaty. Ebenso wird in der im Epidemiologischen Bulletin 46/2021 veröffentlichten 13. Aktualisierung der COVID-19-Impfempfehlung empfohlen, Personen im Alter unter 30 Jahren, die bereits eine 1. Impfstoffdosis Spikevax erhalten hatten, bei der 2. Impfung mit Comirnaty zu impfen."[The STIKO now recommends only the mRNA vaccine Comirnaty from BioNTech/Pfizer for basic COVID-19 immunization in persons under 30 years of age, since in this age group the risk of myocarditis after vaccination with the mRNA vaccine Spikevax from Moderna is higher than with Comirnaty. Similarly, the 13th update of the COVID-19 vaccine recommendation published in Epidemiologic Bulletin 46/2021 recommends that persons younger than 30 years of age who had already received a 1st vaccine dose of Spikevax be vaccinated with Comirnaty at the 2nd vaccination.]
Very likely means that it is not 100.0% sure but well above the treshold of high significance, see e.g. the large NHS study: doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059970. -- Myosci ( talk) 08:20, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Emphasis added -- Myosci ( talk) 08:28, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Since the reintroduction wasn't deleted the subsections above in small. -- Myosci ( talk) 21:09, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Moderna COVID-19 vaccine article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully. |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Moderna COVID-19 vaccine.
|
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I've reverted good faith edits by @ Myosci that mention lack of peer-reviewed scientific publications because I don't think they're necessary in the article. The data about the bivalent vaccines was reviewed by regulatory bodies, the ACIP, and CDC. See slides. While the data isn't in a journal yet, it was made public and reviewed by experts. I'm reverting similar edits on the Pfizer article. ScienceFlyer ( talk) 02:21, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
@recent deletion: It's a - certain - fact that Moderna's vaccine has been discontinued for younger people in countries like Germany, France and Sweden due to the - very likely - increased rate of myocarditis. Even if one doubts the increased rate (like many people once doubted climate change) one cannot deny the fact that vaccination has been restricted due to this concern.-- Myosci ( talk) 08:20, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Die STIKO empfiehlt für die COVID-19-Grundimmunisierung bei unter 30-Jährigen nur noch den mRNA-Impfstoff Comirnaty von BioNTech/Pfizer, da in dieser Altersgruppe das Risiko einer Myokarditis nach Impfung mit dem mRNA-Impfstoff Spikevax von Moderna höher ist als mit Comirnaty. Ebenso wird in der im Epidemiologischen Bulletin 46/2021 veröffentlichten 13. Aktualisierung der COVID-19-Impfempfehlung empfohlen, Personen im Alter unter 30 Jahren, die bereits eine 1. Impfstoffdosis Spikevax erhalten hatten, bei der 2. Impfung mit Comirnaty zu impfen."[The STIKO now recommends only the mRNA vaccine Comirnaty from BioNTech/Pfizer for basic COVID-19 immunization in persons under 30 years of age, since in this age group the risk of myocarditis after vaccination with the mRNA vaccine Spikevax from Moderna is higher than with Comirnaty. Similarly, the 13th update of the COVID-19 vaccine recommendation published in Epidemiologic Bulletin 46/2021 recommends that persons younger than 30 years of age who had already received a 1st vaccine dose of Spikevax be vaccinated with Comirnaty at the 2nd vaccination.]
Very likely means that it is not 100.0% sure but well above the treshold of high significance, see e.g. the large NHS study: doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059970. -- Myosci ( talk) 08:20, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Emphasis added -- Myosci ( talk) 08:28, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Since the reintroduction wasn't deleted the subsections above in small. -- Myosci ( talk) 21:09, 3 October 2022 (UTC)