From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Jezhotwells (
talk)
23:42, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
reply
I shall be reviewing this article against the
Good Article criteria, following its
nomination for Good Article status.
- Thank you for your review.
Tyrol5
[Talk]
00:04, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
reply
Disambiguations: none found.
Linkrot: none found.
Jezhotwells (
talk)
23:43, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
reply
Checking against GA criteria
-
GA review (see
here for what the criteria are, and
here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (
MoS for
lead,
layout,
word choice,
fiction, and
lists):
- Prose OK, MoS sufficiently complied with
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to
reliable sources):
c (
OR):
- References check out, article suitably referenced, no obvious OR
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
Could do with a mention of how Soyuz TM-21 had arrived at Mir
Done Added mention/ref to address this concern.
- Thanks for sorting this out
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- OK
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- OK
- It is illustrated by
images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have
fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
Just one point above to be addressed. On hold for seven days.
Jezhotwells (
talk)
23:53, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
reply
- OK, all is in order, I am happy to list this now. Congratulations.
Jezhotwells (
talk)
00:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
reply