 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I dispute the neutrality of this article, it reads more like a cross between an advert and anti-vivisectionist propaganda. I am not implying that this is junk science, just that the writing overstates the benefit of the technique Colostomyexplosion ( talk) 11:51, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
I agree and have removed many of the sections that I believe are promotional in nature. I recognise that i have added a lot of need citation tags but feel that without them unverified information might be given too much credence by a reader in an article that may be mainly promotion for a particular corporate interest or product. 131.251.134.152 ( talk)
Both external links are no longer valid. On the NC3R site, no such article can be found. Google did provide me with this link to EUMAPP http://www.ist-world.org/ProjectDetails.aspx?ProjectId=7b1c87e4641e4930a4dd1ea4dbae0a70&SourceDatabaseId=8a6f60ff9d0d4439b415324812479c31 It is on another site, more than 10 years old and I cannot verify it. If anyone with a better knowledge of these matters could change the links I'd be most grateful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.160.101.67 ( talk) 12:38, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
How's that working out? · rodii · 13:18, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 January 2024 and 10 May 2024. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Yellowsunshine14 (
article contribs). Peer reviewers:
Devonwinquist.
— Assignment last updated by Devonwinquist ( talk) 17:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I dispute the neutrality of this article, it reads more like a cross between an advert and anti-vivisectionist propaganda. I am not implying that this is junk science, just that the writing overstates the benefit of the technique Colostomyexplosion ( talk) 11:51, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
I agree and have removed many of the sections that I believe are promotional in nature. I recognise that i have added a lot of need citation tags but feel that without them unverified information might be given too much credence by a reader in an article that may be mainly promotion for a particular corporate interest or product. 131.251.134.152 ( talk)
Both external links are no longer valid. On the NC3R site, no such article can be found. Google did provide me with this link to EUMAPP http://www.ist-world.org/ProjectDetails.aspx?ProjectId=7b1c87e4641e4930a4dd1ea4dbae0a70&SourceDatabaseId=8a6f60ff9d0d4439b415324812479c31 It is on another site, more than 10 years old and I cannot verify it. If anyone with a better knowledge of these matters could change the links I'd be most grateful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.160.101.67 ( talk) 12:38, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
How's that working out? · rodii · 13:18, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 January 2024 and 10 May 2024. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Yellowsunshine14 (
article contribs). Peer reviewers:
Devonwinquist.
— Assignment last updated by Devonwinquist ( talk) 17:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)