This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Need to incorporate:
Unsigned comment left by Jim Killock (talk)
Does anyone have a reference for his date of death ? -- Racklever ( talk) 11:45, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Michael P. Barnett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:23, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Michael P. Barnett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:23, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Is the fact that he has edited wikipedia really notable? I am inclined to delete it. -- Bduke ( talk) 10:32, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Do we know for certain that this person is the same as the subject of the article? To me, that’s the real issue. Otherwise this can stay, albeit with a little editing perhaps. Qflib, aka KeeYou Flib ( talk) 16:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Not doubting authenticity - just asking the question. Qflib, aka KeeYou Flib ( talk) 22:18, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Sounds good. I’m all about the citations for verification of publications and editorial work, hence my question. This all sounds reliable to me, and again I agree that it’s appropriate to include. Qflib, aka KeeYou Flib ( talk) 13:33, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Need to incorporate:
Unsigned comment left by Jim Killock (talk)
Does anyone have a reference for his date of death ? -- Racklever ( talk) 11:45, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Michael P. Barnett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:23, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Michael P. Barnett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:23, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Is the fact that he has edited wikipedia really notable? I am inclined to delete it. -- Bduke ( talk) 10:32, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Do we know for certain that this person is the same as the subject of the article? To me, that’s the real issue. Otherwise this can stay, albeit with a little editing perhaps. Qflib, aka KeeYou Flib ( talk) 16:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Not doubting authenticity - just asking the question. Qflib, aka KeeYou Flib ( talk) 22:18, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Sounds good. I’m all about the citations for verification of publications and editorial work, hence my question. This all sounds reliable to me, and again I agree that it’s appropriate to include. Qflib, aka KeeYou Flib ( talk) 13:33, 16 May 2022 (UTC)