This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The material contained in this article describes research which is essential to other articles in wikipedia. They are category of metric spaces, injective metric space, tight span... Without this article the history of the topic would be distored and essentially incomplete. -- Wlod 02:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Indeed, paper:
was one of the early research, which considered the category of metric spaces with metric mappings as morphisms (the research which W.H. had started and got results from 1961 on). -- Wlod 07:53, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Is there someone knowledgeable about the wikipedia procedures who would resolve the unfortunate situation created by "Captain Panda"? -- Wlod 00:49, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
The creation of this article by the writer of the only paper cited looks to be a violation of the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guideline. If I did the search correctly, there are no citations found by MathSciNet to this paper at all. The creator of this article has authored a number of real math papers published in western journals, so to choose such an obscure topic for a new article seems likely to cause difficulty. Notability of this topic can't be established in the conventional way, due to lack of citations to the only reference, so I suggest that it be considered for deletion. EdJohnston 06:41, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
[EdJ moved User:Wlod's reply here. Wlod had originally responded at User_talk:EdJohnston]:
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The material contained in this article describes research which is essential to other articles in wikipedia. They are category of metric spaces, injective metric space, tight span... Without this article the history of the topic would be distored and essentially incomplete. -- Wlod 02:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Indeed, paper:
was one of the early research, which considered the category of metric spaces with metric mappings as morphisms (the research which W.H. had started and got results from 1961 on). -- Wlod 07:53, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Is there someone knowledgeable about the wikipedia procedures who would resolve the unfortunate situation created by "Captain Panda"? -- Wlod 00:49, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
The creation of this article by the writer of the only paper cited looks to be a violation of the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guideline. If I did the search correctly, there are no citations found by MathSciNet to this paper at all. The creator of this article has authored a number of real math papers published in western journals, so to choose such an obscure topic for a new article seems likely to cause difficulty. Notability of this topic can't be established in the conventional way, due to lack of citations to the only reference, so I suggest that it be considered for deletion. EdJohnston 06:41, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
[EdJ moved User:Wlod's reply here. Wlod had originally responded at User_talk:EdJohnston]: