![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I tagged this article for buzzwords. An opening like:
makes me really wonder whether this is an article in search of something to be about. - Smerdis of Tlön 00:40, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
I think, this subject rather relates to advanced fields of scientific research. Among others, it is used in the publications of the renowned world scientific centers as the Harvard and Stanford Universities, and emerge always more frequently in such scientific and engineering branches as artificial intelligence, cognitive science, socio-cognitive research and other interdisciplinary and systemistic studies. The above citation represents the socio-cognitive perspective of the TOGA meta-theory being developed in the Italian National Research Agency for New Technologies, Energy and the Environment (ENEA) since about 1990.
Knowledge has many definitions, therefore also meta-knowledge can be interpreted in different manners, anyway, its notion is the result of the connection of the meaning of prefix meta- with knowledge.
Maybe this concept requires explanations from another perspective yet. By the way, many strictly scientific terms present in Wikipedia are not comprehensible for many Wikipedia users (?).
The present article seems to be inuitively comprehensible (not buzzword) and I suggest to leave its interpretation and improvement to the field specialists. -- Adam M. Gadomski 21:23, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
The DMOZ search template, and by implication all DMOZ search links, is being considered for deletion because it violates WP:ELNO #9. Anyone interested in discussing the fate of Open Directory Project (DMOZ) search links is invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:Dmoz2. Qazin ( talk) 05:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
This article has potential, but needs both cleanup, better in-line references, and accessible to new readers. Anyone willing to take a stab at improving this article? Harvey the rabbit ( talk) 01:28, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
I prepared a re-write for review User:IntelligentComputer/Metaknowledge to boost it out of the stub class. If there are no objections, I will post a final update in a few days. Warren Jones User:IntelligentComputer, 27 Aug 2010, 12:00 EDT
—Preceding unsigned comment added by IntelligentComputer ( talk • contribs) 16:05, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
I removed what I think was the offending reference to Stored purpose, and the para on Minsky suggestions about knowledge consciousness over multiple agents now stands on his own following the para on cycorp. I suggest future comments reference specific paragraphs.
I had omitted a paragraph relating to the metaknowledge issue of Universals versus particulars. I added this and related references to Plato, Aristotle and Newland.
Note that portions of 2 of 11 paragraphs cite work of which I was co-inventor -- IntelligentComputer ( talk) 20:19, 27 August 2010 (UTC). In particular the context solution to the Universals versus particulars question. There aren't a lot of folks doing work in this area and moving forward, I think all edited material should be cited. I invite any and all alternative references and solutions as well as discussion regarding if objective work from machine intelligence should be part of metaknowledge discussions. If a consensus thinks material is not material or neutral, as per the COI guidelines, it won't be in the new article. Hopefully, we will soon get this stub off the face of wikipedia!
Any additional comments? -- IntelligentComputer ( talk) 20:19, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
The TOGA metatheory is completely unknown on the four best universities:
http://search.cam.ac.uk/web?query=TOGA+metatheory => no results
http://www.harvard.edu/searches/?searchtext=TOGA+metatheory => no results
http://web.mit.edu/search.html TOGA+metatheory => no results
http://www.yale.edu/ TOGA+metatheory => no results
Vikom (
talk)
00:23, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Metaknowledge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:23, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I tagged this article for buzzwords. An opening like:
makes me really wonder whether this is an article in search of something to be about. - Smerdis of Tlön 00:40, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
I think, this subject rather relates to advanced fields of scientific research. Among others, it is used in the publications of the renowned world scientific centers as the Harvard and Stanford Universities, and emerge always more frequently in such scientific and engineering branches as artificial intelligence, cognitive science, socio-cognitive research and other interdisciplinary and systemistic studies. The above citation represents the socio-cognitive perspective of the TOGA meta-theory being developed in the Italian National Research Agency for New Technologies, Energy and the Environment (ENEA) since about 1990.
Knowledge has many definitions, therefore also meta-knowledge can be interpreted in different manners, anyway, its notion is the result of the connection of the meaning of prefix meta- with knowledge.
Maybe this concept requires explanations from another perspective yet. By the way, many strictly scientific terms present in Wikipedia are not comprehensible for many Wikipedia users (?).
The present article seems to be inuitively comprehensible (not buzzword) and I suggest to leave its interpretation and improvement to the field specialists. -- Adam M. Gadomski 21:23, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
The DMOZ search template, and by implication all DMOZ search links, is being considered for deletion because it violates WP:ELNO #9. Anyone interested in discussing the fate of Open Directory Project (DMOZ) search links is invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:Dmoz2. Qazin ( talk) 05:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
This article has potential, but needs both cleanup, better in-line references, and accessible to new readers. Anyone willing to take a stab at improving this article? Harvey the rabbit ( talk) 01:28, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
I prepared a re-write for review User:IntelligentComputer/Metaknowledge to boost it out of the stub class. If there are no objections, I will post a final update in a few days. Warren Jones User:IntelligentComputer, 27 Aug 2010, 12:00 EDT
—Preceding unsigned comment added by IntelligentComputer ( talk • contribs) 16:05, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
I removed what I think was the offending reference to Stored purpose, and the para on Minsky suggestions about knowledge consciousness over multiple agents now stands on his own following the para on cycorp. I suggest future comments reference specific paragraphs.
I had omitted a paragraph relating to the metaknowledge issue of Universals versus particulars. I added this and related references to Plato, Aristotle and Newland.
Note that portions of 2 of 11 paragraphs cite work of which I was co-inventor -- IntelligentComputer ( talk) 20:19, 27 August 2010 (UTC). In particular the context solution to the Universals versus particulars question. There aren't a lot of folks doing work in this area and moving forward, I think all edited material should be cited. I invite any and all alternative references and solutions as well as discussion regarding if objective work from machine intelligence should be part of metaknowledge discussions. If a consensus thinks material is not material or neutral, as per the COI guidelines, it won't be in the new article. Hopefully, we will soon get this stub off the face of wikipedia!
Any additional comments? -- IntelligentComputer ( talk) 20:19, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
The TOGA metatheory is completely unknown on the four best universities:
http://search.cam.ac.uk/web?query=TOGA+metatheory => no results
http://www.harvard.edu/searches/?searchtext=TOGA+metatheory => no results
http://web.mit.edu/search.html TOGA+metatheory => no results
http://www.yale.edu/ TOGA+metatheory => no results
Vikom (
talk)
00:23, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Metaknowledge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:23, 26 January 2018 (UTC)