This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Psychology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Business Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Education This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The work of Donald B. Maudsley should be cited. His 1979 PhD. dissertation first lays out the main precepts of meta learning. Copies are available from the University of Toronto. He is also cited in works by Jack Mezirow as early as 1981.

there is a link at the bottom of the page to metalearning.the exact same page,i would fix this myself but i don't know how.-- 75.158.136.36 ( talk) 11:16, 7 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Several years ago, someone re-wrote the first sentence in this article to describe meta-learning as "the study of disciplines." Is this new definition as accurate as the old definition? Jarble ( talk) 02:52, 5 September 2017 (UTC) reply

This new definition was apparently incorrect, but it has been corrected again. Jarble ( talk) 20:14, 10 November 2018 (UTC) reply