This article was nominated for deletion on 2006 July 17. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
fuddlemark ( befuddle me!) 14:38, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
I'm putting the phrase traditional values in quotes, because it's a pejorative, non-neutral POV term. The article in general is almost verbatim copied from portions of the website, with little editorial review. I'm going to help with this review... -- Dbackeberg
I used the word creationism to describe his views because the word is used on his blog. The abortion quote and military deployment quote both came from the blog. I also added an internal link for strict constructionism.
I changed the reference from "our" forces to US forces;en-Wikipedia is supposed to be for all anglophones.-- SuperWikiman 15:35, July 27 2006 (UTC)
Why not delete this article now? The primary is over and this candidate is no longer active. Since there was no good reason to create this article, I say we should delete it now. 02:48, 19 August 2006 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.225.89.251 ( talk • contribs)
It's uncategorized and pertains to a primary that was over seven months ago. The page is never updated, and this guy is not in the news anymore, in any medium other than his own weblog, which is run by his friends, and does not even discuss his candidacy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 164.107.214.143 ( talk) 05:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC).
I say keep him if for humor value only. I like the hypocrisy in the fact he claims to be prolife yet advocates killing homosexuals. I love the contradiction.
BTW, it seems like it is autobiographical
The article as currently written does not seem to pass WP:BLP1E as the comments here and even the AFD debate suggest that he was only notable for the primary.-- balloonguy ( talk) 23:48, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Merrill Keiser. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:04, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 2006 July 17. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
fuddlemark ( befuddle me!) 14:38, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
I'm putting the phrase traditional values in quotes, because it's a pejorative, non-neutral POV term. The article in general is almost verbatim copied from portions of the website, with little editorial review. I'm going to help with this review... -- Dbackeberg
I used the word creationism to describe his views because the word is used on his blog. The abortion quote and military deployment quote both came from the blog. I also added an internal link for strict constructionism.
I changed the reference from "our" forces to US forces;en-Wikipedia is supposed to be for all anglophones.-- SuperWikiman 15:35, July 27 2006 (UTC)
Why not delete this article now? The primary is over and this candidate is no longer active. Since there was no good reason to create this article, I say we should delete it now. 02:48, 19 August 2006 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.225.89.251 ( talk • contribs)
It's uncategorized and pertains to a primary that was over seven months ago. The page is never updated, and this guy is not in the news anymore, in any medium other than his own weblog, which is run by his friends, and does not even discuss his candidacy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 164.107.214.143 ( talk) 05:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC).
I say keep him if for humor value only. I like the hypocrisy in the fact he claims to be prolife yet advocates killing homosexuals. I love the contradiction.
BTW, it seems like it is autobiographical
The article as currently written does not seem to pass WP:BLP1E as the comments here and even the AFD debate suggest that he was only notable for the primary.-- balloonguy ( talk) 23:48, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Merrill Keiser. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:04, 26 January 2018 (UTC)