![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Medieval Monuments in Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:23, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
The site
https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/724 doesnt include the albanian name.
These medieval monuments in kosovo are visible, clearly and indisputable serbian orthodox
And in the article says what albanians tried to destroy these monuments
The Un site says "Autonomous province of Kosovo" (Kosovo and metohia)
So its visible the not related albanian name need to be deleted or putted in second position, because these monuments are serbian (and even UN recognises)
John L. Booth (
talk)
05:04, 4 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:
JohnGotten.
:They're in Kosovo, where the official langauges are Albanian and Serbian. THere's no reason to prefer one over the other in order, so it might as well be alphabetic. The damage during the civil war is immaterial to this discussion. Your UNesco link doesn't include names in either language, so that's irrelevant as well.
Pipsally (
talk) 06:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:
Orchomen.
:Kosovo is not recognised in the Unesco(and it will never be), and is proved in the site, Albanian and Serbian language are official only in existing, but is not like glued, albanian mosques in kosovo will not have serbian name(because its not serbian) like the same serbian orthodox churches will not have albanian name (because its not albanian). Its not only damaged in the civil war, but too in recent albanian arrest against serbs in 2007 and 2012. The albanization name in this its like to put an nazi aryan name in a WW2 damaged synagogue in poland. The name is not in alphabetic order, its not intuitive, but yes by priority, that’s why the Serbian should come first. I am agreed the removal of both serbian and albanian name in the translation of the text "Medieval Monuments in Kosovo", or at least, the albanian name, because is not related
John L. Booth (
talk) 07:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:
JohnGotten.
:@
Pipsally: Do you agree at least to the removal of both Serbian and Albanian names as they are not related with the UNESCO site?
John L. Booth (
talk) 21:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:
JohnGotten.
:: No, I think they should stay per established consensus on the page.
Pipsally (
talk) 02:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:
Orchomen.
:::No, was none "per established consensus on the page", only edit-warring of kosovars sockpuppets, If you continue to respond in a manipulative and malicious manner, I will call an administrator to speak about, as you prove to be a waste of time and a delay in making ethical decisions about Wikipedia policies.
John L. Booth (
talk)
02:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:
JohnGotten.
:::::: What I said is not ad hominem, but a personal overview of what is going on.
::::::: I'm not certain accusing everyone who disagrees with you if being a Nazi helps your case, but let's see what people think.
Pipsally (
talk)
05:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:
Orchomen.
There's a long history of edit warring on this article in reference to the location. The overall and IMO best version seems to be Kosovo, as this is what it is today, but there's are also edits to Serbia, clearly incorrect, and the Autonomous Region of Kosovo. What should be the consensus? Pipsally ( talk) 05:04, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
@
Pipsally: @
El C: Not sure about these edits.
[1]
[2] UNESCO hasn't recognized Kosovo, and accordingly, the link used in the infobox describes the sites as being located in Serbia.
[3] Why was this altered last week after so many years?
Amanuensis Balkanicus (
talk)
16:45, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
:::::maybe the footnote is the best solution for a stable version that will prevent endless readding from either side of the argument and be sufficient for the majority.
Pipsally (
talk)
05:59, 28 June 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:
Orchomen.
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Medieval Monuments in Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:23, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
The site
https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/724 doesnt include the albanian name.
These medieval monuments in kosovo are visible, clearly and indisputable serbian orthodox
And in the article says what albanians tried to destroy these monuments
The Un site says "Autonomous province of Kosovo" (Kosovo and metohia)
So its visible the not related albanian name need to be deleted or putted in second position, because these monuments are serbian (and even UN recognises)
John L. Booth (
talk)
05:04, 4 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:
JohnGotten.
:They're in Kosovo, where the official langauges are Albanian and Serbian. THere's no reason to prefer one over the other in order, so it might as well be alphabetic. The damage during the civil war is immaterial to this discussion. Your UNesco link doesn't include names in either language, so that's irrelevant as well.
Pipsally (
talk) 06:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:
Orchomen.
:Kosovo is not recognised in the Unesco(and it will never be), and is proved in the site, Albanian and Serbian language are official only in existing, but is not like glued, albanian mosques in kosovo will not have serbian name(because its not serbian) like the same serbian orthodox churches will not have albanian name (because its not albanian). Its not only damaged in the civil war, but too in recent albanian arrest against serbs in 2007 and 2012. The albanization name in this its like to put an nazi aryan name in a WW2 damaged synagogue in poland. The name is not in alphabetic order, its not intuitive, but yes by priority, that’s why the Serbian should come first. I am agreed the removal of both serbian and albanian name in the translation of the text "Medieval Monuments in Kosovo", or at least, the albanian name, because is not related
John L. Booth (
talk) 07:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:
JohnGotten.
:@
Pipsally: Do you agree at least to the removal of both Serbian and Albanian names as they are not related with the UNESCO site?
John L. Booth (
talk) 21:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:
JohnGotten.
:: No, I think they should stay per established consensus on the page.
Pipsally (
talk) 02:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:
Orchomen.
:::No, was none "per established consensus on the page", only edit-warring of kosovars sockpuppets, If you continue to respond in a manipulative and malicious manner, I will call an administrator to speak about, as you prove to be a waste of time and a delay in making ethical decisions about Wikipedia policies.
John L. Booth (
talk)
02:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:
JohnGotten.
:::::: What I said is not ad hominem, but a personal overview of what is going on.
::::::: I'm not certain accusing everyone who disagrees with you if being a Nazi helps your case, but let's see what people think.
Pipsally (
talk)
05:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:
Orchomen.
There's a long history of edit warring on this article in reference to the location. The overall and IMO best version seems to be Kosovo, as this is what it is today, but there's are also edits to Serbia, clearly incorrect, and the Autonomous Region of Kosovo. What should be the consensus? Pipsally ( talk) 05:04, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
@
Pipsally: @
El C: Not sure about these edits.
[1]
[2] UNESCO hasn't recognized Kosovo, and accordingly, the link used in the infobox describes the sites as being located in Serbia.
[3] Why was this altered last week after so many years?
Amanuensis Balkanicus (
talk)
16:45, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
:::::maybe the footnote is the best solution for a stable version that will prevent endless readding from either side of the argument and be sufficient for the majority.
Pipsally (
talk)
05:59, 28 June 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock:
Orchomen.