This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
We would like to violently react on the role of the SOCIAL WORKER in this show. We are an avid televiewer of your show and we have observed that the role of the Social Worker in your show is totally opposite in what we actually perform in a real practice. We feel that our profession is being degraded. In reality, the role of the social worker is a mediator for the best interest of our client. We strongly believe on our principles and work ethics. Maybe you can consult the Social Workers employed in your own foundation "BANTAY BATA". We are the group of Social Workers working in a Non-Government Organization that strongly advocates the important role of the Social Workers for our client which is different from the role shown in your show.
We are hoping for your response in this matter!!!
NGO Social Workers-- 121.1.11.162 ( talk) 02:52, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
-- Witchy2006 ( talk) 12:39, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
At first you told us that ratings are unnecessary then, ratings should only be a week ratings stated by you, witchy2006. IN THIS SECTION IT CLEARLY SHOWS THAT THERE IS A LARGE TIME GAP BETWEEN THE TWO and not merely a week of ratings basis.
You accused me on my own page that I am a liar, that MBP won the rating race and not Darna, then i reedited my post to Maricel Soriano and other big stars on subsequent episodes, you are just making a story. I know that you love editing may bukas pa, but i smell conflict of interest bacause you keep on vandalizing the Darna 2009 article which in turn the rival show of this show through deleteing the critical response, trivia section and such while other articles here have them, was there a guideline for not having them? i believe i saw a critical reception in other movie articles here but you have also deleted that section.
J0-r3L ( talk -- 14:31, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
-- Witchy2006 ( talk) 15:02, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Did I even call edits that I don't like as vandalism? you are just making another story,
anyways you accused my edits as vandalism and lies right?, so it's clear that you are accusing me of liar. On the rating section, check the history if I am only one that agreed on rating section, mind you I'm not the only one who is editing on that page and I'm just reverting some sections other users created that you have deleted.
your other question were already answered, refer to the history pages of Darna and may bukas pa and to my first post.
J0-r3L ( talk -- -- 15:20, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
-- Witchy2006 ( talk) 15:34, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
I would recommend YOU to read all my reply and include to it the History sections of Darna and May Bukas Pa.
I quote, "And again, I never mentioned that your edits are vandalism, I dont really have that habit. "
Here's the evidence tsk. tsk..
I called it vandalism for the fact that i discovered that you are an avid May Bukas Pa editor, as you have said on your page that happened to be already deleted that "You Love Editing May Bukas Pa" which is again I will say the rival program of Darna, mind you, you have not just deleted the Ratings section, but the viewership, the critical reception as well as the trivia section per se which is fishy. and again look for the history section for evidences. The only question remains, why bother vandalizing the article rival show of your favorite show?. J0-r3L ( talk -- 16:23, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
When will someone update the storyline?? Gloria Romero's turn has already finished, it's already Pen Medina's time, and sooner or later it's gonna be Krista Ranillo's.
Where are our editors?!!!
And please stop this useless bickering over the show's ratings and of the other network! Please confine your bullshit of a fight at a place not covered by Wikipedia, or I'll request for protection over this article due to incessant bickering of 2 immature editors. Heran et Sang'gres ( talk) 11:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Last night, after re-airing MMK's episode "Lubid", they showned the short teaser trailer of May Bukas Pa that will re-run starting on May 22, 2011. Sorry for my english. Rouward ( talk) 03:08, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on May Bukas Pa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:04, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
We would like to violently react on the role of the SOCIAL WORKER in this show. We are an avid televiewer of your show and we have observed that the role of the Social Worker in your show is totally opposite in what we actually perform in a real practice. We feel that our profession is being degraded. In reality, the role of the social worker is a mediator for the best interest of our client. We strongly believe on our principles and work ethics. Maybe you can consult the Social Workers employed in your own foundation "BANTAY BATA". We are the group of Social Workers working in a Non-Government Organization that strongly advocates the important role of the Social Workers for our client which is different from the role shown in your show.
We are hoping for your response in this matter!!!
NGO Social Workers-- 121.1.11.162 ( talk) 02:52, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
-- Witchy2006 ( talk) 12:39, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
At first you told us that ratings are unnecessary then, ratings should only be a week ratings stated by you, witchy2006. IN THIS SECTION IT CLEARLY SHOWS THAT THERE IS A LARGE TIME GAP BETWEEN THE TWO and not merely a week of ratings basis.
You accused me on my own page that I am a liar, that MBP won the rating race and not Darna, then i reedited my post to Maricel Soriano and other big stars on subsequent episodes, you are just making a story. I know that you love editing may bukas pa, but i smell conflict of interest bacause you keep on vandalizing the Darna 2009 article which in turn the rival show of this show through deleteing the critical response, trivia section and such while other articles here have them, was there a guideline for not having them? i believe i saw a critical reception in other movie articles here but you have also deleted that section.
J0-r3L ( talk -- 14:31, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
-- Witchy2006 ( talk) 15:02, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Did I even call edits that I don't like as vandalism? you are just making another story,
anyways you accused my edits as vandalism and lies right?, so it's clear that you are accusing me of liar. On the rating section, check the history if I am only one that agreed on rating section, mind you I'm not the only one who is editing on that page and I'm just reverting some sections other users created that you have deleted.
your other question were already answered, refer to the history pages of Darna and may bukas pa and to my first post.
J0-r3L ( talk -- -- 15:20, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
-- Witchy2006 ( talk) 15:34, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
I would recommend YOU to read all my reply and include to it the History sections of Darna and May Bukas Pa.
I quote, "And again, I never mentioned that your edits are vandalism, I dont really have that habit. "
Here's the evidence tsk. tsk..
I called it vandalism for the fact that i discovered that you are an avid May Bukas Pa editor, as you have said on your page that happened to be already deleted that "You Love Editing May Bukas Pa" which is again I will say the rival program of Darna, mind you, you have not just deleted the Ratings section, but the viewership, the critical reception as well as the trivia section per se which is fishy. and again look for the history section for evidences. The only question remains, why bother vandalizing the article rival show of your favorite show?. J0-r3L ( talk -- 16:23, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
When will someone update the storyline?? Gloria Romero's turn has already finished, it's already Pen Medina's time, and sooner or later it's gonna be Krista Ranillo's.
Where are our editors?!!!
And please stop this useless bickering over the show's ratings and of the other network! Please confine your bullshit of a fight at a place not covered by Wikipedia, or I'll request for protection over this article due to incessant bickering of 2 immature editors. Heran et Sang'gres ( talk) 11:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Last night, after re-airing MMK's episode "Lubid", they showned the short teaser trailer of May Bukas Pa that will re-run starting on May 22, 2011. Sorry for my english. Rouward ( talk) 03:08, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on May Bukas Pa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:04, 23 January 2018 (UTC)