![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
The article ought to include the fact that M12 is a simple group.
Also it should cite the paper
E. F. Assmus, Jr., and H. F. Mattson (1966) "Perfect codes and the Mathieu groups", Archiv der Mathematik vol. XVII, pp. 121-135.
Hmattson ( talk) 18:51, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
The order is written
This seems unnatural. If written for natural-language clarity, it might be:
If written to show ‘how derived’, it should be:
This seems the best fit with (some) other groups.
Also, the line
seems weird: do we really need to be told that 95040 is approximately a hundred grand? Really?
Of course, if there are long-established conventions for the writing of the order of a group, then this comment (except this sentence) might be wrong. JDAWiseman ( talk) 16:49, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
The article ought to include the fact that M12 is a simple group.
Also it should cite the paper
E. F. Assmus, Jr., and H. F. Mattson (1966) "Perfect codes and the Mathieu groups", Archiv der Mathematik vol. XVII, pp. 121-135.
Hmattson ( talk) 18:51, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
The order is written
This seems unnatural. If written for natural-language clarity, it might be:
If written to show ‘how derived’, it should be:
This seems the best fit with (some) other groups.
Also, the line
seems weird: do we really need to be told that 95040 is approximately a hundred grand? Really?
Of course, if there are long-established conventions for the writing of the order of a group, then this comment (except this sentence) might be wrong. JDAWiseman ( talk) 16:49, 30 December 2015 (UTC)