![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
these had nothing to do with mary jane watson.
Call me stupid, but I kind of want to point out how in the early issues of Ultimate Spider-Man, there seemed to be a tendency for Mary Jane to be called "Mary", rather than "MJ"... pointless trivia really... but... gah, whatever. ( 195.92.168.170 02:21, 2 April 2006 (UTC))
Removed the many inserted references to MJ's "Mad Skillz" in the arts of Basketball... I'll start reporting if it happens again, but it did make me laugh. Check the page history. ( 195.92.168.174 11:46, 5 April 2006 (UTC))
I think there should be a short section on MJ's defensive skills and equipment. Eg, she's trained in self defence, was recently training with Captain America, has fended off normal attackers and the Chameleon, owns a gun, has a amplified spider-tracer, and has Peter's old web-shooters (modified into bracelets). (But as far as I know she's not particularly good at basketball. Anyway...) Thoughts? - HKMARKS 04:21, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
I just did a big rewrite of the Biography section to remove NPOV statements, and provide more biographical information. I might add some of those statements back to the "Controversy" section later if they prove to be relevant and sourced when I look at them more carefully. Then again, maybe not. - HKMARKS 07:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
What's with the disputed section? How come there is no discussion? Has the dispute been resolved? Should I remove the dipsuted section warning? -- Lenehey 18:06, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
how is mary jane gay? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.198.245 ( talk • contribs)
I removed the character box for Ultimate Mary Jane. The reason being that if the Ultimate versions get them, why not every other version? And then it just gets cluttered. For the most part there isn't that huge a difference-- the only difference between 616 and Ultimate MJ that fits in the SSB is that Bendis and Bagley had a hand in her creation, and her first appearance. There was a short discussion on the subject here. - HKMarks 00:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
I agree too. Regardless of the fact I added it. But I see it's not needed. But if I may ask, why does the Gwen Stacy#Ultimate Gwen Stacy have a box? UnDeRsCoRe 04:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
I looked at the cover for Ultimate Spider-Man #105. Looks promisin'... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.101.86.69 ( talk) 01:27, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
I fell this picture is just awqwardly styled, she looks lioke she was putting on maskara with her mouth possitioned like that. Would it be possible for someone to model her off of a earlier comic or even one of the tv shows?. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.93.102.90 ( talk) 03:35, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
I just found this out on the Spider-Man article...(sigh)..Mary Jane will die, in the new comic series of Spider-Man coming in 2007. (breaks down sobbing) 70.58.211.220
Any official source to confirm it? Even if so, I doubt it will be permanent. (Remember that disaterous plane crash, she was kidnapped only). UnDeRsCoRe 00:00, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Thank goodness (phew!) 70.58.211.220
With Recent Events in civil War it looks like her death may be possible. Quesada hates the Spider-Marriage.
I'm right with you on that. If it happens, fans will be pissed, and marvel better hope that movie crowd buys the books, because I wont.
Image:Maryjanenovel.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Well if you read the spiderman that came out in free comic book it revealed a character called Jackpot who was quite clearly Mary Jane Watson.I think we should mention this in the article. Parralax
This article should deal with the growing popularity of the character. In sequence: she became he wife of Spider-Man in 1987 She became the main supporting character and first and main love interest in Ultimate Spider-Man (nearly a co-feature) 1n 1999 She is the first and main love interest in the movie franchise She became the main character of two novels in 2003 She became the main character of her own comic (Mary Jane and Spider-Man loves Mary Jane) in 2004
Does she appear in Spidey Super Stories, Marvel Adventures Spider-Man?
Other versions: this should be in some sequence like alphabetical. I suggest chronological to underline her growing prominence. Except I don't know all the dates of the alternate versions. -- Leocomix 15:04, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Anybody notice how Mary Jane's being used nowadays? She always appears in some media adaption first, and then Gwen Stacy comes and causes conflicts. That really annoys me. It's the same thing over and over again. Is there ever gonna be a media adaption truly loyal to what exactly happens in the comics? Sheesh. 71.217.235.164 20:11, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mary Jane Watson article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject. A gx7 06:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
I think the controversy about that recent toy should be in the Controversy section as it relates to the depiction of the character, and the basic info about the toy should go in the Toys section. A gx7 05:03, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Image:Marvelage54bills.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:53, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
This article is nominated for deletion? That's insane! She's one of Spider-Man's biggest supporting characters! The article is great. The deletion notice needs to be improved. -- Vinnyvinny2 09:52, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Five bucks Joe Quesada nominated it for deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. R.K.Z ( talk • contribs) 21:01, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:AmSpiGirl8.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 09:24, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:Mjanimated.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:57, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:Spider love.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 22:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Spider-Man---Reign-01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 22:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Here I feel I must dispute the Controversies section under the entry for Mary Jane Watson. In this section it is stated that "...but fans vocally supported the feisty Mary Jane over the non-offensive Gwen Stacy. The pairing of Mary Jane and Peter Parker has become one of the true classic romances of the comic medium and the couple are considered to be one of the superhero genre's most beloved "super-couples," second possibly to Clark Kent and Lois Lane." Being alive at the time I can testify that most fans I knew always preferred Gwen Stacy to Mary Jane and to this day many of us resent the fact that Peter became involved with Mary Jane and today she is often portrayed as the true love of his life. To wit, in an article at Underground Online "Gwen Stacy (Bryce Dallas Howard)" it states, "...and, in some Spidey fan's eyes, she's the real "true love" of their favorite hero." In an Itani Rosenbaum's April 17, 2007 column at Silver Bullet Comics Behind The Panels #7 - Spider-Man Blue, Rosenbaum states that "...Gwen was, is, and always will be, Peter’s first true love. She was the girl of his dreams."
I realise that there are many younger fans, particularly those raised on the animated cartoons and the movie who probably prefer Mary Jane to Gwen and who probably feel that Mary Jane is his true love, but to me it appears that there is enough of a disagreement, particularly among older fans, that it can be disputed that fans overwhelmingly prefer Mary Jane to Gwen.
Drakesix — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drakesix ( talk • contribs) 15:36, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
I would have removed the section about the speculation over One More Day myself but I thought that reporting speculation was allowed. The words themselves weren't guess-work, it's a fact that there has been a great amount of speculation over the OMD story. - Vox — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.104.236.154 ( talk) 01:49, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Maryjanenovel.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 04:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:Maryjaneross.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 04:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Mary Jane.... English for "Maria Juana"... or... "Marijuana"... Cannabis Sativa... SO ODD... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.6.3.156 ( talk) 23:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
back when mary jane was created the drug was not nicknamed mary jane not since the 70's has anyone called it mary jane thats hippy lingo are you a hippy i think so —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackjohnson15 ( talk • contribs) 20:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:Asmannual21.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 04:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
I added an image of the Creature that Ultimate MJ chanegd into at the end of Ultimate Spider-Man #101, as I thought it would help readers with no access to comic book stores. MJ is here show in all her hairy red beastiness. SaliereTheFish 10:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
I read through half the article today and although I feel it is among the best the Wikipedia comic book community have created there is still much bias throughout the article and numerous spelling errors, it reads more like a personal essay than encyclopedia article. I suggest we summarize the fictional biography to shorten the article or give it it's very own page. Thanks, Eatspie ( talk) 02:53, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Mary Jane is not the women on the cover for #561 it's Paperdoll. Mary Jane does appear on the cover on that newspaper comparing her to Jackpot though. So I deleted it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.168.213 ( talk) 21:23, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Pure speculation. And last time i checked, thats not good. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.232.242.232 ( talk) 20:39, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
I deleted this section because there is no actual reference to the character. Just that they are simalar in appearence Bottomlivefan95 ( talk) 12:07, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
"Many fans have found this a constant irritation, and feel it "cheapens" MJ's love for Peter on his own merits without becoming aware of his powers." This is point of view. There are no sources for the statement, so it looks like someone just put their opinion into the article, and then added 'many fans' at the start. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.30.1.163 ( talk) 15:57, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
There is no title picture for the character,one should be added.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 17:00, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Why is it irrelevant that Stan Lee also created her boyfriend? Lois Lane vs Mary Jane ( talk) 11:11, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Why there is so few illustrations of her? Isn't she one of the most important character of the franchise? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2Questions ( talk • contribs) 00:34, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Watching spiderman far from home trailer peter acknowledged her as mj and even the director acknowledged mj could be anyone it like liz allen she was the love interest in the comics or even gwan stacy but this new love interest Michelle jones nickname mj has that new addition to being apart of the mcu mary jane Underdog0123 ( talk) 14:36, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
One or more images currently used in this article have been nominated for deletion as violations of the non-free content criteria (NFCC).
You can read more about what this means and why these files are being nominated for deletion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Image deletion nominations for NFCC 8 and 3a.
You can participate at the deletion discussion(s) at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 April 26. If you are not familiar with NFCC-related deletion discussions, I recommend reading the post linked above first.
Sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 03:48, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
these had nothing to do with mary jane watson.
Call me stupid, but I kind of want to point out how in the early issues of Ultimate Spider-Man, there seemed to be a tendency for Mary Jane to be called "Mary", rather than "MJ"... pointless trivia really... but... gah, whatever. ( 195.92.168.170 02:21, 2 April 2006 (UTC))
Removed the many inserted references to MJ's "Mad Skillz" in the arts of Basketball... I'll start reporting if it happens again, but it did make me laugh. Check the page history. ( 195.92.168.174 11:46, 5 April 2006 (UTC))
I think there should be a short section on MJ's defensive skills and equipment. Eg, she's trained in self defence, was recently training with Captain America, has fended off normal attackers and the Chameleon, owns a gun, has a amplified spider-tracer, and has Peter's old web-shooters (modified into bracelets). (But as far as I know she's not particularly good at basketball. Anyway...) Thoughts? - HKMARKS 04:21, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
I just did a big rewrite of the Biography section to remove NPOV statements, and provide more biographical information. I might add some of those statements back to the "Controversy" section later if they prove to be relevant and sourced when I look at them more carefully. Then again, maybe not. - HKMARKS 07:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
What's with the disputed section? How come there is no discussion? Has the dispute been resolved? Should I remove the dipsuted section warning? -- Lenehey 18:06, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
how is mary jane gay? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.198.245 ( talk • contribs)
I removed the character box for Ultimate Mary Jane. The reason being that if the Ultimate versions get them, why not every other version? And then it just gets cluttered. For the most part there isn't that huge a difference-- the only difference between 616 and Ultimate MJ that fits in the SSB is that Bendis and Bagley had a hand in her creation, and her first appearance. There was a short discussion on the subject here. - HKMarks 00:51, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
I agree too. Regardless of the fact I added it. But I see it's not needed. But if I may ask, why does the Gwen Stacy#Ultimate Gwen Stacy have a box? UnDeRsCoRe 04:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
I looked at the cover for Ultimate Spider-Man #105. Looks promisin'... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.101.86.69 ( talk) 01:27, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
I fell this picture is just awqwardly styled, she looks lioke she was putting on maskara with her mouth possitioned like that. Would it be possible for someone to model her off of a earlier comic or even one of the tv shows?. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.93.102.90 ( talk) 03:35, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
I just found this out on the Spider-Man article...(sigh)..Mary Jane will die, in the new comic series of Spider-Man coming in 2007. (breaks down sobbing) 70.58.211.220
Any official source to confirm it? Even if so, I doubt it will be permanent. (Remember that disaterous plane crash, she was kidnapped only). UnDeRsCoRe 00:00, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Thank goodness (phew!) 70.58.211.220
With Recent Events in civil War it looks like her death may be possible. Quesada hates the Spider-Marriage.
I'm right with you on that. If it happens, fans will be pissed, and marvel better hope that movie crowd buys the books, because I wont.
Image:Maryjanenovel.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Well if you read the spiderman that came out in free comic book it revealed a character called Jackpot who was quite clearly Mary Jane Watson.I think we should mention this in the article. Parralax
This article should deal with the growing popularity of the character. In sequence: she became he wife of Spider-Man in 1987 She became the main supporting character and first and main love interest in Ultimate Spider-Man (nearly a co-feature) 1n 1999 She is the first and main love interest in the movie franchise She became the main character of two novels in 2003 She became the main character of her own comic (Mary Jane and Spider-Man loves Mary Jane) in 2004
Does she appear in Spidey Super Stories, Marvel Adventures Spider-Man?
Other versions: this should be in some sequence like alphabetical. I suggest chronological to underline her growing prominence. Except I don't know all the dates of the alternate versions. -- Leocomix 15:04, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Anybody notice how Mary Jane's being used nowadays? She always appears in some media adaption first, and then Gwen Stacy comes and causes conflicts. That really annoys me. It's the same thing over and over again. Is there ever gonna be a media adaption truly loyal to what exactly happens in the comics? Sheesh. 71.217.235.164 20:11, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mary Jane Watson article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject. A gx7 06:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
I think the controversy about that recent toy should be in the Controversy section as it relates to the depiction of the character, and the basic info about the toy should go in the Toys section. A gx7 05:03, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Image:Marvelage54bills.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:53, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
This article is nominated for deletion? That's insane! She's one of Spider-Man's biggest supporting characters! The article is great. The deletion notice needs to be improved. -- Vinnyvinny2 09:52, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Five bucks Joe Quesada nominated it for deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. R.K.Z ( talk • contribs) 21:01, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:AmSpiGirl8.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 09:24, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:Mjanimated.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:57, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:Spider love.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 22:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Spider-Man---Reign-01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 22:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Here I feel I must dispute the Controversies section under the entry for Mary Jane Watson. In this section it is stated that "...but fans vocally supported the feisty Mary Jane over the non-offensive Gwen Stacy. The pairing of Mary Jane and Peter Parker has become one of the true classic romances of the comic medium and the couple are considered to be one of the superhero genre's most beloved "super-couples," second possibly to Clark Kent and Lois Lane." Being alive at the time I can testify that most fans I knew always preferred Gwen Stacy to Mary Jane and to this day many of us resent the fact that Peter became involved with Mary Jane and today she is often portrayed as the true love of his life. To wit, in an article at Underground Online "Gwen Stacy (Bryce Dallas Howard)" it states, "...and, in some Spidey fan's eyes, she's the real "true love" of their favorite hero." In an Itani Rosenbaum's April 17, 2007 column at Silver Bullet Comics Behind The Panels #7 - Spider-Man Blue, Rosenbaum states that "...Gwen was, is, and always will be, Peter’s first true love. She was the girl of his dreams."
I realise that there are many younger fans, particularly those raised on the animated cartoons and the movie who probably prefer Mary Jane to Gwen and who probably feel that Mary Jane is his true love, but to me it appears that there is enough of a disagreement, particularly among older fans, that it can be disputed that fans overwhelmingly prefer Mary Jane to Gwen.
Drakesix — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drakesix ( talk • contribs) 15:36, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
I would have removed the section about the speculation over One More Day myself but I thought that reporting speculation was allowed. The words themselves weren't guess-work, it's a fact that there has been a great amount of speculation over the OMD story. - Vox — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.104.236.154 ( talk) 01:49, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Maryjanenovel.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 04:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:Maryjaneross.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 04:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Mary Jane.... English for "Maria Juana"... or... "Marijuana"... Cannabis Sativa... SO ODD... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.6.3.156 ( talk) 23:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
back when mary jane was created the drug was not nicknamed mary jane not since the 70's has anyone called it mary jane thats hippy lingo are you a hippy i think so —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackjohnson15 ( talk • contribs) 20:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:Asmannual21.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 04:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
I added an image of the Creature that Ultimate MJ chanegd into at the end of Ultimate Spider-Man #101, as I thought it would help readers with no access to comic book stores. MJ is here show in all her hairy red beastiness. SaliereTheFish 10:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
I read through half the article today and although I feel it is among the best the Wikipedia comic book community have created there is still much bias throughout the article and numerous spelling errors, it reads more like a personal essay than encyclopedia article. I suggest we summarize the fictional biography to shorten the article or give it it's very own page. Thanks, Eatspie ( talk) 02:53, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Mary Jane is not the women on the cover for #561 it's Paperdoll. Mary Jane does appear on the cover on that newspaper comparing her to Jackpot though. So I deleted it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.168.213 ( talk) 21:23, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Pure speculation. And last time i checked, thats not good. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.232.242.232 ( talk) 20:39, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
I deleted this section because there is no actual reference to the character. Just that they are simalar in appearence Bottomlivefan95 ( talk) 12:07, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
"Many fans have found this a constant irritation, and feel it "cheapens" MJ's love for Peter on his own merits without becoming aware of his powers." This is point of view. There are no sources for the statement, so it looks like someone just put their opinion into the article, and then added 'many fans' at the start. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.30.1.163 ( talk) 15:57, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
There is no title picture for the character,one should be added.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 17:00, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Why is it irrelevant that Stan Lee also created her boyfriend? Lois Lane vs Mary Jane ( talk) 11:11, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Why there is so few illustrations of her? Isn't she one of the most important character of the franchise? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2Questions ( talk • contribs) 00:34, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Watching spiderman far from home trailer peter acknowledged her as mj and even the director acknowledged mj could be anyone it like liz allen she was the love interest in the comics or even gwan stacy but this new love interest Michelle jones nickname mj has that new addition to being apart of the mcu mary jane Underdog0123 ( talk) 14:36, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
One or more images currently used in this article have been nominated for deletion as violations of the non-free content criteria (NFCC).
You can read more about what this means and why these files are being nominated for deletion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Image deletion nominations for NFCC 8 and 3a.
You can participate at the deletion discussion(s) at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 April 26. If you are not familiar with NFCC-related deletion discussions, I recommend reading the post linked above first.
Sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 03:48, 29 April 2020 (UTC)