This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Marriott World Trade Center article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Since there's no need for disambiguation, this should be at Marriott World Trade Center, without the "(hotel)" bit. Move blocked by redirect page. Kafziel Talk 00:32, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Perhaps the lead of this article should mention that the hotel was destroyed on 9-11. Dsmdgold ( talk) 02:26, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
These pages were merged without discussion or stated reason a few years back (2011), to my bewilderment. The building would seem to be notable, not just the address/plot of land it was on; further, the infobox was deleted during the merge. The content would come from the section placed on Three World Trade Center, which is substantively unchanged from the merge. Please feel free to raise objections, etc, at this talk page, or see the original discussion at this talk page section. Techhead7890 ( talk) 10:47, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Marriott World Trade Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:13, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Marriott World Trade Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:44, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
@ MONGO MOS:BOLDSYN says "significant alternative titles (which should usually also redirect to the article) are placed in bold". The Marriott World Trade Center was known under all names that I mention: World Trade Center 3 ( WTC 3 or 3 WTC), the World Trade Center Hotel, the Vista International Hotel, Vista Hotel and the Marriott Hotel, and I provided references for these names. Some of these indeed redirect to this page, while others redirect to its successor, Three World Trade Center at 175 Greenwich Street. Following the rule as outlined in the Manual of Style, all these names should be in bold. Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk) 17:48, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Marriott World Trade Center article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Since there's no need for disambiguation, this should be at Marriott World Trade Center, without the "(hotel)" bit. Move blocked by redirect page. Kafziel Talk 00:32, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Perhaps the lead of this article should mention that the hotel was destroyed on 9-11. Dsmdgold ( talk) 02:26, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
These pages were merged without discussion or stated reason a few years back (2011), to my bewilderment. The building would seem to be notable, not just the address/plot of land it was on; further, the infobox was deleted during the merge. The content would come from the section placed on Three World Trade Center, which is substantively unchanged from the merge. Please feel free to raise objections, etc, at this talk page, or see the original discussion at this talk page section. Techhead7890 ( talk) 10:47, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Marriott World Trade Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:13, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Marriott World Trade Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:44, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
@ MONGO MOS:BOLDSYN says "significant alternative titles (which should usually also redirect to the article) are placed in bold". The Marriott World Trade Center was known under all names that I mention: World Trade Center 3 ( WTC 3 or 3 WTC), the World Trade Center Hotel, the Vista International Hotel, Vista Hotel and the Marriott Hotel, and I provided references for these names. Some of these indeed redirect to this page, while others redirect to its successor, Three World Trade Center at 175 Greenwich Street. Following the rule as outlined in the Manual of Style, all these names should be in bold. Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk) 17:48, 4 October 2018 (UTC)