This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
if marriage was only to bring someone from overseas and one of the parties was forced to marry is it duress and fraud and does it constitute a void marriage?
There is not one word about what preceded the 1961 Act and this information is generally difficult to find on Wiki. Too many commentators of marriage only go back this far yet want to claim tradition as a key factor in preventing marriage equality. Is the inherent unfairness of marriage prior to this Act why this history is missing from both wiki and conservative activism? Ericglare ( talk) 10:40, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Marriage Act 1961 (Australia). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 17:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Marriage Act 1961 (Australia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au/piweb/translatewipilink.ASPX?Folder=oldbills&Criteria=BILL_ID%3Ar2123%3BSEQ_NUM%3A0%3BWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia page Marriage Act 1961 (Australia) does not explain the context of why the Act was introduced. Instead, the page deviates from the Act 1961 thru the Sexual Discrimination Amendment Act 1991 the to the Amendment Act 2004 in order to repeat the point that same sex marriage is not permitted. This is more a case of intended waffle than an account of the facts. The page incorrectly includes a section on the "current status of the Marriage Amendment Act". This section is out of date and refers to a spurious selection on where certain politicians stood on the issue over the past decade. The section ignores the currency of the debate over a plebiscite on same-sex marriage versus the role of Parliament to legislate directly on this.
What's missing?
-- 124.148.65.94 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) 14:06, 16 July 2017
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
if marriage was only to bring someone from overseas and one of the parties was forced to marry is it duress and fraud and does it constitute a void marriage?
There is not one word about what preceded the 1961 Act and this information is generally difficult to find on Wiki. Too many commentators of marriage only go back this far yet want to claim tradition as a key factor in preventing marriage equality. Is the inherent unfairness of marriage prior to this Act why this history is missing from both wiki and conservative activism? Ericglare ( talk) 10:40, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Marriage Act 1961 (Australia). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 17:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Marriage Act 1961 (Australia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au/piweb/translatewipilink.ASPX?Folder=oldbills&Criteria=BILL_ID%3Ar2123%3BSEQ_NUM%3A0%3BWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia page Marriage Act 1961 (Australia) does not explain the context of why the Act was introduced. Instead, the page deviates from the Act 1961 thru the Sexual Discrimination Amendment Act 1991 the to the Amendment Act 2004 in order to repeat the point that same sex marriage is not permitted. This is more a case of intended waffle than an account of the facts. The page incorrectly includes a section on the "current status of the Marriage Amendment Act". This section is out of date and refers to a spurious selection on where certain politicians stood on the issue over the past decade. The section ignores the currency of the debate over a plebiscite on same-sex marriage versus the role of Parliament to legislate directly on this.
What's missing?
-- 124.148.65.94 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) 14:06, 16 July 2017