This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have added copyvio to this page due to User talk:141.163.84.1's complaint of copyvio, I have told him how to report this. HighInBC 15:56, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
If that is true, and he does hold the copyright, did he surrender it when he posted it? Or can he still enforce it? Does anybody know? HighInBC 16:00, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
When contributing, users must "agree to license your contributions under the GFDL." I do not believe you can re-claim the text after releasing it. — TheKMan talk 16:19, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
We have recieved a complaint on OTRS about this article (ticket #2006060610007684). Basically, the primary author is a graduate student who, misunderstanding the nature of wikipedia, posted some of her original research here and now wishes to have it removed. As it is original research, I'm going to delete it in a few hours per Wikipedia policy; I'm also going to ask her if she would do us a favor and supply a small (non-original-research) replacement. Raul654 04:58, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
"Frannie" vs "Fannie". On balance, I've reverted to "Frannie", as this is what the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography says. It may well be "Fannie", but Wikipedia's verifiability policy says we give priority third-party published secondary sources, and the ODNB takes priority over a thesis. Gordonofcartoon ( talk) 16:55, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Marlow Moss. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:18, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
I removed it from the references since it's described as "an alternative biography that indirectly shows how history is constructed" [1]. If this work is itself notable it might warrant a mention in the article, but based on what I could tell it doesn't seem to be a reliable source for Moss. Umimmak ( talk) 19:08, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have added copyvio to this page due to User talk:141.163.84.1's complaint of copyvio, I have told him how to report this. HighInBC 15:56, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
If that is true, and he does hold the copyright, did he surrender it when he posted it? Or can he still enforce it? Does anybody know? HighInBC 16:00, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
When contributing, users must "agree to license your contributions under the GFDL." I do not believe you can re-claim the text after releasing it. — TheKMan talk 16:19, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
We have recieved a complaint on OTRS about this article (ticket #2006060610007684). Basically, the primary author is a graduate student who, misunderstanding the nature of wikipedia, posted some of her original research here and now wishes to have it removed. As it is original research, I'm going to delete it in a few hours per Wikipedia policy; I'm also going to ask her if she would do us a favor and supply a small (non-original-research) replacement. Raul654 04:58, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
"Frannie" vs "Fannie". On balance, I've reverted to "Frannie", as this is what the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography says. It may well be "Fannie", but Wikipedia's verifiability policy says we give priority third-party published secondary sources, and the ODNB takes priority over a thesis. Gordonofcartoon ( talk) 16:55, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Marlow Moss. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:18, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
I removed it from the references since it's described as "an alternative biography that indirectly shows how history is constructed" [1]. If this work is itself notable it might warrant a mention in the article, but based on what I could tell it doesn't seem to be a reliable source for Moss. Umimmak ( talk) 19:08, 7 October 2020 (UTC)