![]() | Mark of the Year is a former featured list. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page and why it was removed. If it has improved again to featured list standard, you may renominate the article to become a featured list. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
All the other years have press sources showing who won mark of the year. 2007 only has an online link to afl.com which "might" go dead.
Surely, somebody discussed this in the press???????? Ga rr ie 05:06, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Way too many mentions of the major sponsor for my liking. One or two, max, for my taste. Regards, Ben Aveling 09:38, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
What is the correct title of the award? Is it Mark Of the Year, AFL Mark Of the Year, Austrailian Football League Mark Of the Year, or something else? Whatever it is, it's what should be in bold in the first line and it should be the name of the article, with other variants and different cases (e.g. "of" instead of "Of" or vice-versa) created as redirects. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 14:24, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Wording like "Run within the paradigm of Australian Rules Football" is ridiculous. Needs to more clearly explain what it is about. -- Rulesfan ( talk) 03:12, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Normally, the use of "reference section"-style references vs. in-line external-links should be consistent across an article. Not doing so would normally be a hard block for featured-content status. However, I've seen what it was like before and it's clear that this is a case where we can and should
ignore all rules to make the article more readable.
davidwr/(
talk)/(
contribs)/(
e-mail) 04:10, 28 November 2008 (UTC) see below
davidwr/(
talk)/(
contribs)/(
e-mail) 04:46, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
mddawson1, a video uploader on Youtube for at least one of these videos, claims
Please note in regards to videos from ABC TV: "[The ABC wishes] to get our content out there on as many platforms as possible, run by as many different operators as possible." Courtney Gibson, head of arts, entertainment and comedy at ABC TV.
See also here and here. Anyone know how to get this officially confirmed, or possibly get ABC to make some sort of ruling on this. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 02:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
This award does not exist prior to 2001.
See AFL Record Season Guides e.g. 2008 page 509: "Since 2001, the AFL has made weekly nominations for the official version of the Mark of the Year and the winner has been announced at the end of the season."
RossRSmith ( talk) 09:12, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
That's because it wasn't the AFL before 1998. Here [3] is an account back to 1998. Mkmetalhead ( talk) 21:45, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
RossRSmith ( talk) 10:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
I was very surprised to see this article was a featured list, considering the flowery, non-neutral language: "huge screamer", "spectacular mark", etc. Some of the notes have quotations, but many have refer to "speckys" without a reference. St Anselm ( talk) 16:49, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Mark of the Year. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:32, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Entries on this list vary regarding the tense. I assume it should be past tense ("jumped"), but a few entries are in the present tense. Lots of the descriptions need to be rewritten in an encyclopedic tone, too. St Anselm ( talk) 21:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
Mark of the Year. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Mark of the Year. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 10:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 11 external links on Mark of the Year. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() | Mark of the Year is a former featured list. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page and why it was removed. If it has improved again to featured list standard, you may renominate the article to become a featured list. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
All the other years have press sources showing who won mark of the year. 2007 only has an online link to afl.com which "might" go dead.
Surely, somebody discussed this in the press???????? Ga rr ie 05:06, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Way too many mentions of the major sponsor for my liking. One or two, max, for my taste. Regards, Ben Aveling 09:38, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
What is the correct title of the award? Is it Mark Of the Year, AFL Mark Of the Year, Austrailian Football League Mark Of the Year, or something else? Whatever it is, it's what should be in bold in the first line and it should be the name of the article, with other variants and different cases (e.g. "of" instead of "Of" or vice-versa) created as redirects. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 14:24, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Wording like "Run within the paradigm of Australian Rules Football" is ridiculous. Needs to more clearly explain what it is about. -- Rulesfan ( talk) 03:12, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Normally, the use of "reference section"-style references vs. in-line external-links should be consistent across an article. Not doing so would normally be a hard block for featured-content status. However, I've seen what it was like before and it's clear that this is a case where we can and should
ignore all rules to make the article more readable.
davidwr/(
talk)/(
contribs)/(
e-mail) 04:10, 28 November 2008 (UTC) see below
davidwr/(
talk)/(
contribs)/(
e-mail) 04:46, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
mddawson1, a video uploader on Youtube for at least one of these videos, claims
Please note in regards to videos from ABC TV: "[The ABC wishes] to get our content out there on as many platforms as possible, run by as many different operators as possible." Courtney Gibson, head of arts, entertainment and comedy at ABC TV.
See also here and here. Anyone know how to get this officially confirmed, or possibly get ABC to make some sort of ruling on this. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 02:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
This award does not exist prior to 2001.
See AFL Record Season Guides e.g. 2008 page 509: "Since 2001, the AFL has made weekly nominations for the official version of the Mark of the Year and the winner has been announced at the end of the season."
RossRSmith ( talk) 09:12, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
That's because it wasn't the AFL before 1998. Here [3] is an account back to 1998. Mkmetalhead ( talk) 21:45, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
RossRSmith ( talk) 10:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
I was very surprised to see this article was a featured list, considering the flowery, non-neutral language: "huge screamer", "spectacular mark", etc. Some of the notes have quotations, but many have refer to "speckys" without a reference. St Anselm ( talk) 16:49, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Mark of the Year. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:32, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Entries on this list vary regarding the tense. I assume it should be past tense ("jumped"), but a few entries are in the present tense. Lots of the descriptions need to be rewritten in an encyclopedic tone, too. St Anselm ( talk) 21:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
Mark of the Year. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Mark of the Year. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 10:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 11 external links on Mark of the Year. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)