This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
Thx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:5E40:35B0:CCF8:A64E:60D8:7476 ( talk) 04:27, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Mark Dice has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hello, my edit request is regarded Mark Dice's bio/description. In the description it says quote " conspiracy theorist " this is incorrect in that all of his so called conspiracy theories were for comedic purposes and should not be taken seriously, for these reasons I think that the editors should remove Conspiracy Theories from the description. In his book 'The Illuminati: Facts & Fiction' he was not promoting conspiracy theories rather he was separating fact from fiction, and in the first few pages of the book stated the "I am not a conspiracy theorist." Thank You for your time. [1]7 71.112.160.88 ( talk) 18:15, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Or perhaps Wikipedia can say that the Mainstream media has called him "conspiracy theorist" which he denies. Seems a bit foolish to me that all it takes is that "reliable sources" call you something for Wikipedia entry to then state that is what you are. Two, or even five news outlets, giving someone a label does not make him factually so. I am operating under the assumption that Wiki entries are still supposed to present facts, and not opinions. The fact is that he is CALLED such-and-such by the media outlets. It is not a fact that he IS so. So even if your "mission" is to "summarize" what popular sources say, THAT is what should say: "Popular sources label him..." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:D000:A200:619E:6004:F4B3:1B97:C3F ( talk) 22:54, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
He has over 1.5 million subscribers and over 300 million views. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ATPsithlord ( talk • contribs) 16:18, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
We should include his notable racism. It's quite noticeable through his social media accounts, specifically Twitter in which he claims "Black Crimes Matter," and "You're not helping to combat that "angry black woman" stereotype FYI."
The guy should have some racism accusations in his bio. Emo524 ( talk) 23:29, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Lol you miss the point. In the black community blacks are murder more by blacks than blacks being killed by Caucasians, cops, and other minorities combined and that’s including justified. “Black Lives Matter” normalizes fighting the police and ignores the bad decisions of those who clearly was shot and killed justifiably. They hide the facts it was the actions of the individuals that lead to their untimely death and use skin color as a scape goat. When others in the community see this twisted view on reality they are more likely to do the same thing. Not to mention caucasians are killed by cops way more than blacks every year and 99% that I have seen on tape for cops shooting both whites and blacks were justified. Mfaul92 ( talk) 19:27, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
If this is a discussion about Mark Dice is is missing 90 percent of his work and grossly understating the number of people that watch him every day, and his television appearances, number of number one books he has written and number of videos he has posted. Censorship is what i see here. Dan Guthrey ( talk) 20:09, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
How come if I look up Destiny, a YouTube and Twitch streamer, I can conveniently see on his sidebar that he has about 80 million YouTube views on his channel. Meanwhile, I look on the even more popular Mark Dice's Wikipedia page and I can't even see any stats for him? That is withholding vital information from people who view this page. (NOTE: I altered the title of this section since it seems to be discussing adding his YouTube statistics) JettaMann ( talk) 18:20, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
How come if I look up Destiny, a YouTube and Twitch streamer, I can conveniently see on his sidebar that he has about 80 million YouTube views on his channel.In contravention with our SOPs, an editor has added that information without verifying it to reliable, third-party sources.
That is withholding vital information from people who view this page.It's apparently not vital enough: none of the acceptable sources we've cultivated in the article mention such. If you have further reliable sourcing, please share it here. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 21:15, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Youtube followers can be bought, politicians can be bought, Wikipedia editors can be bought. What is your point here? Sounds like censorship to me Kelthazad ( talk) 06:46, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
I understand that these companies exist. Someone's facts should be challenged if this is used. However, in the United States (also where Mark resides), a person is considered innocent until proven guilty. The 14th amendment to the US Constitution guarantees to every person, aliens included, “equal protection under the law." With that said, I do not think it is fair for any one person to claim that Mark Dice had bought views or subscriptions without any proof.
Mark Dice had appeared on multiple television shows, so his renown must be worth something. 1.5 million subscribers is quite a lot. While this doesn't seem to place him in a "top 100", it is nothing to scoff at.
I will digress this conversation, as it is mentioned that his subscribers had been restored. However, I do petition to place that piece of information at the top of the page, rather than buried deep within it. Kelthazad ( talk) 14:17, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
I am not questioning whether Wikipedia has to follow the US Constitution, I think you missed my point. Wikipedia should be built upon facts and tangible evidence. The fact that some random person on the internet can decide what information is important or not is completely opinionated, unless there is evidence to prove otherwise. Even if evidence is supplied, that very same person can decide that "it is not good enough."
Your rebuttal to shows you haven't even validated the information being discussed. Mark has 1.5 million SUBSCRIBERS and over 300 million VIEWS. Please don't misconstrue these facts.
Let's take Drew Lunch for an example. This Wiki summary lists 2.5 million subscribers and 140 million views in the top summary of the page. So how is it really fair for the admins to decide to not readily disclose this information for Mark?
You all are downplaying Mark Dice's achievements and making his page seem like his just some conspiracy theorist with no credibility. This smells of foul play and it really shows that Wikipedia is capable of misinformation, censorship and credibility with its pages and its administrators. Kelthazad ( talk) 15:30, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Drew Lynch Kelthazad ( talk) 15:32, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you random person for reinforcing my point on evidence not being good enough.
You may literally look up any YouTuber and statistics are provided. I was simply providing an example for the sake of discussion. Kelthazad ( talk) 16:10, 25 January 2020 (UTC) Many of us have argued these states are trivial, what would matter is if they are in the top 10 (or 100 or 500), not in the top 6,000 youtube channels. All this does is tell us that Mr Dice is less important than [ [3]], that is not much of an achievement. Slatersteven ( talk) 16:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
That's what I wanted to insinuate with "seemingly". Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:17, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
In other words, “Mission Accomplished”? The point being that WP has successfully made its (incorrect) point appear to be fact. Dice’s main bio description should be “Internet Influencer”. Using “American Conspiracy Theorist”, while technically valid, is about a decade out date. While I enjoy his videos, I am not a rabid fan but at the same time I don’t recall reading anything about “The Illuminati” although I have seen The Bilderburg Group (an actual thing) mentioned on occasion.
My impression of this page upon seeing it last night was a “WTF” moment as it was pretty clear that it was written with a left-wing bias. Now I’m a noob when it comes to page edits and proper WP editing protocols, it was still surprising that the page has to be locked down “to prevent vandalism” so I’m not getting into a hornets nest as my original intent was to change Conspiracy Theorist to Internet Influencer. It all makes it appear (to use an actual conspiracy theory) that Wikipedia is not as neutral as it claims to be. CTyankee1 ( talk) 03:47, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
References
Mark Dice is absolutely being censored by this platform. If you are going to pretend to give the facts give them and punish those who write fake stuff.
I see that from previous talk page discussions and per WP:NOTCV not all works necessarily need to be listed, especially when self-published. I noticed that the TUSI-TV source seemed to only promote the existence of the book, also presenting it uncritically and without review. Since this was evidence of a press release I tagged the source as such. — Paleo Neonate – 05:57, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Please give one example of racism and conspiracy theories. No sources? Mfaul92 ( talk) 19:14, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Should we? GreenFrogsGoRibbit ( talk) 01:18, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
@ Binksternet:, why do you disagree with calling Dice a media analyst? I'm curious to hear your thoughts. X-Editor ( talk) 23:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Mark Dice has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please post the entire stories as it leaves the reader with an impression of an imposter; and most of the points brought up have a whole story to them. We are not to judge; we may know the truth. 24.200.81.193 ( talk) 13:38, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
It is really bothering me. ( talk) 09:07, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
It says “promoting conspiracy theories” as a separate thing he is known for, while promoting is lowercase. Sorry, I’m not sure if that’s called a bio, I’m a new editor here. It’s just below his picture. ( talk) 00:28, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
My life is a lie. Wikipedia, you win. 😭 ( talk) 14:00, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Please archive and close, thank you. - Tyrone ( talk) 18:38, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Mark Dice has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
He is a best selling author. 94.139.154.25 ( talk) 12:24, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
References
Hi, I don't have extended permissions. Could someone please add the other books such as Liberalism: Find a Cure, The True Story of Fake News, Big Brother, & Hollywood Propaganda. It would be a simple task that I would do if I had permission. All one needs to do to see the bibliography is a simple search on Amazon or on his website. The books are widely sold. Thank you CurrentlyResearching ( talk) 03:03, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
@Gråbergs Gråa Sång If you need sources for the books hes written that leaves out a lot of books then why not change it to "Books written by Mark Dice" instead of bibliography? Supremebloxboy ( talk) 11:22, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
In the lead there is this sole citation for supporting a line stating "formerly known by the pseudonym John Conner", Yet no where in that entire article does it state that fact. Only mention of a pseudonym John Conner. Also a google search of "Mark Dice John Conner" really only returns this wikipedia article along with a lot of blogs stating he was called John Connor. Can we find any actual WP:RS that says he went by the name John Connor. No blogs. No Opinion pieces. Eruditess ( talk) 01:51, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Mark Dice has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
He is not a conspiracy theorist, he is a political commentator who makes fun of CNN and does prank surveys with strangers. Mark Dice is a media analyst, political activist, and author. Anything but a conspiracy theorist. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4412986/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm He has been on the following series, History Channel's Decoded, Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura, Secret Societies of Hollywood on E! Channel, America Declassified on the Travel Channel, the Sundance Channel's Love/Lust: Secret Societies Horrified895 ( talk) 03:05, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Mark Dice has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can you stop slandering people like him. He is an entirely different person once you watch his youtube videos. Referencing mainstream media articles shouldn't count as actual sources. Horrified895 ( talk) 03:14, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Mark Dice has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove "conspiracy theorist" 38.101.158.253 ( talk) 03:58, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Mark Dice has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove the hateful and divisive language of "right-wing pundit", "conspiracy theorist", and any other intentional language used to defame. 47.197.115.181 ( talk) 23:17, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Mark Dice is not happy with is article on Wikipedia. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqEbZGIimHA Someone Not Awful ( talk) 13:41, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
It is not that Mark Dice is unhappy with this article on Wikipedia, it has to do with the idea that Wikipedia promotes a Left-Wing bias. I go to these talk pages to correct Left-Wing bias that I have seen in these articles, and will continue to do so, quoting my sources. Easeltine ( talk) 17:55, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Yes, judge for yourselves, watch Mark Dice videos on the Beach that he does. Obviously, these people do not read Wikipedia. Easeltine ( talk)! — Preceding undated comment added 18:42, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
many of the tidbits in this article, the he said she said cat fights and rumor mongering and the one off comments on YouTube are off passing interest and do not read as encyclopedic even if factual. I'm going to condense them down into a representative few paragraphs, and trim the less notable. SkidMountTubularFrame ( talk) 06:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
Thx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:5E40:35B0:CCF8:A64E:60D8:7476 ( talk) 04:27, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Mark Dice has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hello, my edit request is regarded Mark Dice's bio/description. In the description it says quote " conspiracy theorist " this is incorrect in that all of his so called conspiracy theories were for comedic purposes and should not be taken seriously, for these reasons I think that the editors should remove Conspiracy Theories from the description. In his book 'The Illuminati: Facts & Fiction' he was not promoting conspiracy theories rather he was separating fact from fiction, and in the first few pages of the book stated the "I am not a conspiracy theorist." Thank You for your time. [1]7 71.112.160.88 ( talk) 18:15, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Or perhaps Wikipedia can say that the Mainstream media has called him "conspiracy theorist" which he denies. Seems a bit foolish to me that all it takes is that "reliable sources" call you something for Wikipedia entry to then state that is what you are. Two, or even five news outlets, giving someone a label does not make him factually so. I am operating under the assumption that Wiki entries are still supposed to present facts, and not opinions. The fact is that he is CALLED such-and-such by the media outlets. It is not a fact that he IS so. So even if your "mission" is to "summarize" what popular sources say, THAT is what should say: "Popular sources label him..." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:D000:A200:619E:6004:F4B3:1B97:C3F ( talk) 22:54, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
He has over 1.5 million subscribers and over 300 million views. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ATPsithlord ( talk • contribs) 16:18, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
We should include his notable racism. It's quite noticeable through his social media accounts, specifically Twitter in which he claims "Black Crimes Matter," and "You're not helping to combat that "angry black woman" stereotype FYI."
The guy should have some racism accusations in his bio. Emo524 ( talk) 23:29, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Lol you miss the point. In the black community blacks are murder more by blacks than blacks being killed by Caucasians, cops, and other minorities combined and that’s including justified. “Black Lives Matter” normalizes fighting the police and ignores the bad decisions of those who clearly was shot and killed justifiably. They hide the facts it was the actions of the individuals that lead to their untimely death and use skin color as a scape goat. When others in the community see this twisted view on reality they are more likely to do the same thing. Not to mention caucasians are killed by cops way more than blacks every year and 99% that I have seen on tape for cops shooting both whites and blacks were justified. Mfaul92 ( talk) 19:27, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
If this is a discussion about Mark Dice is is missing 90 percent of his work and grossly understating the number of people that watch him every day, and his television appearances, number of number one books he has written and number of videos he has posted. Censorship is what i see here. Dan Guthrey ( talk) 20:09, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
How come if I look up Destiny, a YouTube and Twitch streamer, I can conveniently see on his sidebar that he has about 80 million YouTube views on his channel. Meanwhile, I look on the even more popular Mark Dice's Wikipedia page and I can't even see any stats for him? That is withholding vital information from people who view this page. (NOTE: I altered the title of this section since it seems to be discussing adding his YouTube statistics) JettaMann ( talk) 18:20, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
How come if I look up Destiny, a YouTube and Twitch streamer, I can conveniently see on his sidebar that he has about 80 million YouTube views on his channel.In contravention with our SOPs, an editor has added that information without verifying it to reliable, third-party sources.
That is withholding vital information from people who view this page.It's apparently not vital enough: none of the acceptable sources we've cultivated in the article mention such. If you have further reliable sourcing, please share it here. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 21:15, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Youtube followers can be bought, politicians can be bought, Wikipedia editors can be bought. What is your point here? Sounds like censorship to me Kelthazad ( talk) 06:46, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
I understand that these companies exist. Someone's facts should be challenged if this is used. However, in the United States (also where Mark resides), a person is considered innocent until proven guilty. The 14th amendment to the US Constitution guarantees to every person, aliens included, “equal protection under the law." With that said, I do not think it is fair for any one person to claim that Mark Dice had bought views or subscriptions without any proof.
Mark Dice had appeared on multiple television shows, so his renown must be worth something. 1.5 million subscribers is quite a lot. While this doesn't seem to place him in a "top 100", it is nothing to scoff at.
I will digress this conversation, as it is mentioned that his subscribers had been restored. However, I do petition to place that piece of information at the top of the page, rather than buried deep within it. Kelthazad ( talk) 14:17, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
I am not questioning whether Wikipedia has to follow the US Constitution, I think you missed my point. Wikipedia should be built upon facts and tangible evidence. The fact that some random person on the internet can decide what information is important or not is completely opinionated, unless there is evidence to prove otherwise. Even if evidence is supplied, that very same person can decide that "it is not good enough."
Your rebuttal to shows you haven't even validated the information being discussed. Mark has 1.5 million SUBSCRIBERS and over 300 million VIEWS. Please don't misconstrue these facts.
Let's take Drew Lunch for an example. This Wiki summary lists 2.5 million subscribers and 140 million views in the top summary of the page. So how is it really fair for the admins to decide to not readily disclose this information for Mark?
You all are downplaying Mark Dice's achievements and making his page seem like his just some conspiracy theorist with no credibility. This smells of foul play and it really shows that Wikipedia is capable of misinformation, censorship and credibility with its pages and its administrators. Kelthazad ( talk) 15:30, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Drew Lynch Kelthazad ( talk) 15:32, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you random person for reinforcing my point on evidence not being good enough.
You may literally look up any YouTuber and statistics are provided. I was simply providing an example for the sake of discussion. Kelthazad ( talk) 16:10, 25 January 2020 (UTC) Many of us have argued these states are trivial, what would matter is if they are in the top 10 (or 100 or 500), not in the top 6,000 youtube channels. All this does is tell us that Mr Dice is less important than [ [3]], that is not much of an achievement. Slatersteven ( talk) 16:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
That's what I wanted to insinuate with "seemingly". Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:17, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
In other words, “Mission Accomplished”? The point being that WP has successfully made its (incorrect) point appear to be fact. Dice’s main bio description should be “Internet Influencer”. Using “American Conspiracy Theorist”, while technically valid, is about a decade out date. While I enjoy his videos, I am not a rabid fan but at the same time I don’t recall reading anything about “The Illuminati” although I have seen The Bilderburg Group (an actual thing) mentioned on occasion.
My impression of this page upon seeing it last night was a “WTF” moment as it was pretty clear that it was written with a left-wing bias. Now I’m a noob when it comes to page edits and proper WP editing protocols, it was still surprising that the page has to be locked down “to prevent vandalism” so I’m not getting into a hornets nest as my original intent was to change Conspiracy Theorist to Internet Influencer. It all makes it appear (to use an actual conspiracy theory) that Wikipedia is not as neutral as it claims to be. CTyankee1 ( talk) 03:47, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
References
Mark Dice is absolutely being censored by this platform. If you are going to pretend to give the facts give them and punish those who write fake stuff.
I see that from previous talk page discussions and per WP:NOTCV not all works necessarily need to be listed, especially when self-published. I noticed that the TUSI-TV source seemed to only promote the existence of the book, also presenting it uncritically and without review. Since this was evidence of a press release I tagged the source as such. — Paleo Neonate – 05:57, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Please give one example of racism and conspiracy theories. No sources? Mfaul92 ( talk) 19:14, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Should we? GreenFrogsGoRibbit ( talk) 01:18, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
@ Binksternet:, why do you disagree with calling Dice a media analyst? I'm curious to hear your thoughts. X-Editor ( talk) 23:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Mark Dice has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please post the entire stories as it leaves the reader with an impression of an imposter; and most of the points brought up have a whole story to them. We are not to judge; we may know the truth. 24.200.81.193 ( talk) 13:38, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
It is really bothering me. ( talk) 09:07, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
It says “promoting conspiracy theories” as a separate thing he is known for, while promoting is lowercase. Sorry, I’m not sure if that’s called a bio, I’m a new editor here. It’s just below his picture. ( talk) 00:28, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
My life is a lie. Wikipedia, you win. 😭 ( talk) 14:00, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Please archive and close, thank you. - Tyrone ( talk) 18:38, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Mark Dice has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
He is a best selling author. 94.139.154.25 ( talk) 12:24, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
References
Hi, I don't have extended permissions. Could someone please add the other books such as Liberalism: Find a Cure, The True Story of Fake News, Big Brother, & Hollywood Propaganda. It would be a simple task that I would do if I had permission. All one needs to do to see the bibliography is a simple search on Amazon or on his website. The books are widely sold. Thank you CurrentlyResearching ( talk) 03:03, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
@Gråbergs Gråa Sång If you need sources for the books hes written that leaves out a lot of books then why not change it to "Books written by Mark Dice" instead of bibliography? Supremebloxboy ( talk) 11:22, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
In the lead there is this sole citation for supporting a line stating "formerly known by the pseudonym John Conner", Yet no where in that entire article does it state that fact. Only mention of a pseudonym John Conner. Also a google search of "Mark Dice John Conner" really only returns this wikipedia article along with a lot of blogs stating he was called John Connor. Can we find any actual WP:RS that says he went by the name John Connor. No blogs. No Opinion pieces. Eruditess ( talk) 01:51, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Mark Dice has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
He is not a conspiracy theorist, he is a political commentator who makes fun of CNN and does prank surveys with strangers. Mark Dice is a media analyst, political activist, and author. Anything but a conspiracy theorist. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4412986/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm He has been on the following series, History Channel's Decoded, Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura, Secret Societies of Hollywood on E! Channel, America Declassified on the Travel Channel, the Sundance Channel's Love/Lust: Secret Societies Horrified895 ( talk) 03:05, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Mark Dice has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can you stop slandering people like him. He is an entirely different person once you watch his youtube videos. Referencing mainstream media articles shouldn't count as actual sources. Horrified895 ( talk) 03:14, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Mark Dice has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove "conspiracy theorist" 38.101.158.253 ( talk) 03:58, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Mark Dice has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove the hateful and divisive language of "right-wing pundit", "conspiracy theorist", and any other intentional language used to defame. 47.197.115.181 ( talk) 23:17, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Mark Dice is not happy with is article on Wikipedia. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqEbZGIimHA Someone Not Awful ( talk) 13:41, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
It is not that Mark Dice is unhappy with this article on Wikipedia, it has to do with the idea that Wikipedia promotes a Left-Wing bias. I go to these talk pages to correct Left-Wing bias that I have seen in these articles, and will continue to do so, quoting my sources. Easeltine ( talk) 17:55, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Yes, judge for yourselves, watch Mark Dice videos on the Beach that he does. Obviously, these people do not read Wikipedia. Easeltine ( talk)! — Preceding undated comment added 18:42, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
many of the tidbits in this article, the he said she said cat fights and rumor mongering and the one off comments on YouTube are off passing interest and do not read as encyclopedic even if factual. I'm going to condense them down into a representative few paragraphs, and trim the less notable. SkidMountTubularFrame ( talk) 06:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)