![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
The introduction to the article was pretty messy, so I cleaned it up some. It needs more work, the gameplay section is still very vague and nobody would be able to get any idea of what gameplay is like from the current description. I'll try to fix it later myself, I just can't think well right now. Some guy 06:08, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
I added two screenshots to this article, so I removed the suggestion for more photos. CJ 18:20, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Why isn't there a part in this arcitle (spelling) about the Action times in each board? They're unique to this game, so I think they should be in it. What do you guys think? 66.168.207.105 18:09, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
This section is really crufty, and I think it should be removed. Any objections? – The Gr e at Llama sign here 23:55, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
I've re added the list. If you want, you can remove the descriptions. Henchman 2000 19:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Since there are 71 games, but the box only says 70, what do you think is the missing game?
In the minigame list, everything is from the point of view of the player, not the neutral point of view. – Llama man sign here 17:22, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
CROSSPOST
END CROSSPOST. DO NOT POST IN THIS SECTION.
Image:Marioparty3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:06, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Over the past week, a IP user going by 166.147.112.254 / 166.147.120.33 / 166.147.120.19 / 166.147.120.18 has, on four separate occassions, added false information about a Virtual Console release. A search for sources turns up nothing -- if he has a source, he needs to add it, though it doesn't seem to be a "real" claim. I have left notices on his talk page(s), to no avail. I doubt constantly reverting him is the way to go -- what else can I do? Salvidrim ( talk) 01:34, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
The editor has struck again, so I've asked for temporary semi-protection to see if the inability to edit will prompt him/her to go do something else instead of making our jobs harder. -- McDoob AU 93 01:16, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Conflicting sources. Some are more reliable than others, but I'd still like a second opinion.
It would seem that 7-May-2001 is the correct date, both from sheer numbers and from reliability (GamePro, Metacritic, IGN being generally reliable, and MobyGames, GiantBomb being of doubtful reliability, while GameFAQs is generally not even considered). Unless there is a different idea, I'll change it back to 7-May and use the Metacritic source.
Salvidrim (
talk)
02:02, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
With the Story Mode's theme of trying to figure out who should own the Millennium Star, a summary would go nicely here. 2603:6010:8B45:FA00:2077:C477:CB7F:492D ( talk) 02:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
The introduction to the article was pretty messy, so I cleaned it up some. It needs more work, the gameplay section is still very vague and nobody would be able to get any idea of what gameplay is like from the current description. I'll try to fix it later myself, I just can't think well right now. Some guy 06:08, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
I added two screenshots to this article, so I removed the suggestion for more photos. CJ 18:20, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Why isn't there a part in this arcitle (spelling) about the Action times in each board? They're unique to this game, so I think they should be in it. What do you guys think? 66.168.207.105 18:09, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
This section is really crufty, and I think it should be removed. Any objections? – The Gr e at Llama sign here 23:55, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
I've re added the list. If you want, you can remove the descriptions. Henchman 2000 19:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Since there are 71 games, but the box only says 70, what do you think is the missing game?
In the minigame list, everything is from the point of view of the player, not the neutral point of view. – Llama man sign here 17:22, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
CROSSPOST
END CROSSPOST. DO NOT POST IN THIS SECTION.
Image:Marioparty3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:06, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Over the past week, a IP user going by 166.147.112.254 / 166.147.120.33 / 166.147.120.19 / 166.147.120.18 has, on four separate occassions, added false information about a Virtual Console release. A search for sources turns up nothing -- if he has a source, he needs to add it, though it doesn't seem to be a "real" claim. I have left notices on his talk page(s), to no avail. I doubt constantly reverting him is the way to go -- what else can I do? Salvidrim ( talk) 01:34, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
The editor has struck again, so I've asked for temporary semi-protection to see if the inability to edit will prompt him/her to go do something else instead of making our jobs harder. -- McDoob AU 93 01:16, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Conflicting sources. Some are more reliable than others, but I'd still like a second opinion.
It would seem that 7-May-2001 is the correct date, both from sheer numbers and from reliability (GamePro, Metacritic, IGN being generally reliable, and MobyGames, GiantBomb being of doubtful reliability, while GameFAQs is generally not even considered). Unless there is a different idea, I'll change it back to 7-May and use the Metacritic source.
Salvidrim (
talk)
02:02, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
With the Story Mode's theme of trying to figure out who should own the Millennium Star, a summary would go nicely here. 2603:6010:8B45:FA00:2077:C477:CB7F:492D ( talk) 02:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)