This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view. Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 4 June 2022. Error: Disclosures that use the |checked= parameter should also use |editedhere=yes for at least one contributor.
|
The birth place, as a rule of biography. has to be mentioned. The family name is common in Venetia.-- 79.31.202.45 ( talk) 07:17, 21 September 2012 (UTC) Tipical surname in Padua, acutally. http://www.gens.info/italia/it/turismo-viaggi-e-tradizioni-italia?cognome=mazzucato&x=0&y=0#.UqbxDuJWLl8 -- 147.162.48.1 ( talk) 10:48, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Since Mazzucato is listed among Italian economists, somebody should take care writing the article in Italian Wikipedia.-- 2.235.7.199 ( talk) 13:30, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mariana Mazzucato. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
She gave a TED talk in 2013: https://www.ted.com/talks/mariana_mazzucato_government_investor_risk_taker_innovator?language=en
Shouldn't this be mentioned in the article? Tal Galili ( talk) 09:33, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
This economist is suddenly widely known and has appeared in all the usual corporate outlets: New York Times, Wired, etc. It's hard to understand why she is immediately popular but it might be that this well vetted academic is least offensive to powerful people - especially during an American election cycle thus her recent appearances in multiple outlets.
Consider that one of her major premise(s) seems to be an amplification of an overly simplified understanding (delusion?) of "state" and "private" mechanisms or in most people's minds "entities". Is discrediting a myth with a so-called more moderate approach (what is it?) something that's going to sell books to wide audiences? Perhaps. What should we expect from someone who is popularized by the media?
I have read some of her output and so far. I see bullshit that doesn't offend the status quo. Unfortunately this can't be easily substantiated here - bullshit is simply an useless opinion. But is her Ted talk geared for an audience of people who are barely surviving paycheck to paycheck? Millions of them? Are millions of people satisfied with the status quo? Obviously her Ted speech isn't intended for people who largely no longer matter in so far that they must be convinced that they do. Moreover these "poor" people certainly consider the status quo to be problematic. What do poor people have to do with her Ted speech? Nothing and that's my point about why we should question a celebrity economist who has been foisted into the public conscience. If you're comfortable with Wired, The New York Times, et al forming your opinions with supposedly sensible ideas then her Ted speech and the accolades in major media are probably "for you" and no other consideration is needed.
If someone is keen on adding some analysis to her "economics" then that addition should be most appropriate to this Wikipedia bio. Celebrity is fine but up for debate is what she is saying or writing - allegedly about economics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.120.172.35 ( talk) 00:38, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
RyanPatrickFarrell, as Wikipedia is not a CV, we don't list all or nearly all publications of scientists. They are typically not relevant to our readers, who could go to Google Scholar for an indiscrimate collection of papers / policy briefs. We try to pick out the most impactful ones. I selected the most-cited ones, but happy to discuss a different criterion.
If somebody reverts your edit, the correct thing is to discuss it on the talk page (here) and reach a consensus on what the article should say. You should not re-add it without discussion. See Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. FemkeMilene ( talk) 16:14, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
The recent edits had a few useful bits, so I'm not going to revert them wholesale (might still be the best solution here), but there are significant problems:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view. Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 4 June 2022. Error: Disclosures that use the |checked= parameter should also use |editedhere=yes for at least one contributor.
|
The birth place, as a rule of biography. has to be mentioned. The family name is common in Venetia.-- 79.31.202.45 ( talk) 07:17, 21 September 2012 (UTC) Tipical surname in Padua, acutally. http://www.gens.info/italia/it/turismo-viaggi-e-tradizioni-italia?cognome=mazzucato&x=0&y=0#.UqbxDuJWLl8 -- 147.162.48.1 ( talk) 10:48, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Since Mazzucato is listed among Italian economists, somebody should take care writing the article in Italian Wikipedia.-- 2.235.7.199 ( talk) 13:30, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mariana Mazzucato. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
She gave a TED talk in 2013: https://www.ted.com/talks/mariana_mazzucato_government_investor_risk_taker_innovator?language=en
Shouldn't this be mentioned in the article? Tal Galili ( talk) 09:33, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
This economist is suddenly widely known and has appeared in all the usual corporate outlets: New York Times, Wired, etc. It's hard to understand why she is immediately popular but it might be that this well vetted academic is least offensive to powerful people - especially during an American election cycle thus her recent appearances in multiple outlets.
Consider that one of her major premise(s) seems to be an amplification of an overly simplified understanding (delusion?) of "state" and "private" mechanisms or in most people's minds "entities". Is discrediting a myth with a so-called more moderate approach (what is it?) something that's going to sell books to wide audiences? Perhaps. What should we expect from someone who is popularized by the media?
I have read some of her output and so far. I see bullshit that doesn't offend the status quo. Unfortunately this can't be easily substantiated here - bullshit is simply an useless opinion. But is her Ted talk geared for an audience of people who are barely surviving paycheck to paycheck? Millions of them? Are millions of people satisfied with the status quo? Obviously her Ted speech isn't intended for people who largely no longer matter in so far that they must be convinced that they do. Moreover these "poor" people certainly consider the status quo to be problematic. What do poor people have to do with her Ted speech? Nothing and that's my point about why we should question a celebrity economist who has been foisted into the public conscience. If you're comfortable with Wired, The New York Times, et al forming your opinions with supposedly sensible ideas then her Ted speech and the accolades in major media are probably "for you" and no other consideration is needed.
If someone is keen on adding some analysis to her "economics" then that addition should be most appropriate to this Wikipedia bio. Celebrity is fine but up for debate is what she is saying or writing - allegedly about economics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.120.172.35 ( talk) 00:38, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
RyanPatrickFarrell, as Wikipedia is not a CV, we don't list all or nearly all publications of scientists. They are typically not relevant to our readers, who could go to Google Scholar for an indiscrimate collection of papers / policy briefs. We try to pick out the most impactful ones. I selected the most-cited ones, but happy to discuss a different criterion.
If somebody reverts your edit, the correct thing is to discuss it on the talk page (here) and reach a consensus on what the article should say. You should not re-add it without discussion. See Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. FemkeMilene ( talk) 16:14, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
The recent edits had a few useful bits, so I'm not going to revert them wholesale (might still be the best solution here), but there are significant problems: