This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have made some major changes to the article. As I said in the summary of my changes, I work for the eco-network, so of course there is an internal bias. However, I've made a strong effort to stick to the facts, and in my humble opinion it is now less biased by pov than when I started, partially because of the citations I have made, partially because of my language, and partially because having more information in the article allows readers to form their own opinions more easily.
I'd have loved to put in any opposing positions, but there aren't any organizations that I can think of that directly oppose us, nor are there any controversies, so it is sort of centred from the perspective of an environmentalist. I don't know how to tie in an opposing view and make it relevant to an article on the eco-network, unless I could find some sort of article directly mentioning the organization and putting forth an article against them.
If anyone has any such information, please come forward and edit it into the article; it would improve it.
Likewise, I've been using Wikipedia for many years but have rarely edited anything, and I don't really know much about how things work here. If anyone thinks it's worthwhile to re-assess this article, go ahead. Also, I removed the tag at the top of the article that claimed that the tone 'may need to be revised'. I did so because I felt the tone was more factual and more professional after my edits, but since I don't really know the standards, I may have taken it away too soon. If that was the case, I apologize, feel free to repost it.
Sincerely, Mikhail Kolybaba (User:Mikhailkolybaba)
I have assessed this article as a Start Class, as it contains more detail and organization than a Stub Class, and of low importance, as it is a highly specialized topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 17:50, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 19 external links on Manitoba Eco-Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.livinggreenlivingwell.ca/ecodriver/about-us{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.mec.ca/Main/content_text.jsp?FOLDER%3C%3Efolder_id=2534374302883385{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://ecodrivermanitoba.ca/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:28, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have made some major changes to the article. As I said in the summary of my changes, I work for the eco-network, so of course there is an internal bias. However, I've made a strong effort to stick to the facts, and in my humble opinion it is now less biased by pov than when I started, partially because of the citations I have made, partially because of my language, and partially because having more information in the article allows readers to form their own opinions more easily.
I'd have loved to put in any opposing positions, but there aren't any organizations that I can think of that directly oppose us, nor are there any controversies, so it is sort of centred from the perspective of an environmentalist. I don't know how to tie in an opposing view and make it relevant to an article on the eco-network, unless I could find some sort of article directly mentioning the organization and putting forth an article against them.
If anyone has any such information, please come forward and edit it into the article; it would improve it.
Likewise, I've been using Wikipedia for many years but have rarely edited anything, and I don't really know much about how things work here. If anyone thinks it's worthwhile to re-assess this article, go ahead. Also, I removed the tag at the top of the article that claimed that the tone 'may need to be revised'. I did so because I felt the tone was more factual and more professional after my edits, but since I don't really know the standards, I may have taken it away too soon. If that was the case, I apologize, feel free to repost it.
Sincerely, Mikhail Kolybaba (User:Mikhailkolybaba)
I have assessed this article as a Start Class, as it contains more detail and organization than a Stub Class, and of low importance, as it is a highly specialized topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 17:50, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 19 external links on Manitoba Eco-Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.livinggreenlivingwell.ca/ecodriver/about-us{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.mec.ca/Main/content_text.jsp?FOLDER%3C%3Efolder_id=2534374302883385{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://ecodrivermanitoba.ca/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:28, 15 January 2018 (UTC)