This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What is the short referred to in the infobox, it's not mentioned anywhere else in the article. Paul 1978 19:34, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Radio Times is not a primary, nor an independent source. It's a media publication with a for-profit motive and bias. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.141.210.225 ( talk) 18:01, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Do not most publications have a for-profit motive? Even, say, the Encyclopaedia Britannica? Should we disregard a reference in The Times, or in a book published by HarperCollins, because they are owned by Rupert Murdoch, who also owns Fox? Tsuguya ( talk) 02:36, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Do any of the characters from this show have their own page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.3.136.48 ( talk) 16:18, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Man About the House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:48, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What is the short referred to in the infobox, it's not mentioned anywhere else in the article. Paul 1978 19:34, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Radio Times is not a primary, nor an independent source. It's a media publication with a for-profit motive and bias. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.141.210.225 ( talk) 18:01, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Do not most publications have a for-profit motive? Even, say, the Encyclopaedia Britannica? Should we disregard a reference in The Times, or in a book published by HarperCollins, because they are owned by Rupert Murdoch, who also owns Fox? Tsuguya ( talk) 02:36, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Do any of the characters from this show have their own page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.3.136.48 ( talk) 16:18, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Man About the House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:48, 14 January 2018 (UTC)