This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 45 | ← | Archive 49 | Archive 50 | Archive 51 | Archive 52 | Archive 53 | → | Archive 55 |
I am a CanadianI would like to thank the Wikipedia editors for featuring a great deal of Canadian content on the Main Page. Canada's contributions to the world are often overlooked because of our own pre-occupation with our internal problems (e.g. Quebec secession, regionalism in general), and the fact that we seem to suffer from a inferiority complex due to our proximity to the United States. In other words, we don't do a good job of "selling ourselves," and thus don't give much of a reason for others to notice what we've done.
Part of the problem is that Canadians are not well educated in their own history and hence do not have a good understanding of the relative worth of our contributions. Hopefully, via Wikipedia, the world (Canadians included) will have a better idea of Canada's small but significant role on the international scene in the past and in the present. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lonesome road ( talk • contribs) .
We do however, have a lot of trees. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.34.68.10 ( talk • contribs) .
(more canadian content!!!) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.70.95.203 ( talk • contribs) ..
Along with Canadian 'contributions,' though, Canadians should be schooled in some of the less pleasant parts of Canadian history and society. Residential schools, Japanese internment, a cozy relationship with Suharto, Saskatchewan Uranium being used for armour-piercing bullets in the first Gulf War (and the tons of radioactive bullets that now litter the Iraq landscape), and current racial tensions (Saskatoon police officers leaving aboriginals out to die in the cold...) need to be discussed before we sink into a cacophony of smug and self-congratulatory national pride.
-- Subbevil 16:57, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
From your text it seems Canada is the only country which has done something wrong. All countries can be accused of something bad. That's not the point. Canada's problem is, as stated, its border with the US who simply dumb them down all the time for no reason (I am shocked at the amount of absolutely bold statements about Canada in American films/series/music etc. Everyone seems to forget that neither Americans nor Canadians actually belong where they live now thus there is no place for pride.
-- Guest 16:57, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
For thousands of years it has worked this way: You defeat a nation (or a people), you take there land, it is now yours. It was this way when we came to America's. We defeated the indians, and therefore the land is now ours. Thats how it has worked for THOUSANDS of years, and that is how it worked in that regard. Are you also going to say other pieces of conquered land in England are not theres? How bout Germany? Russia? Your statment was ingnorant of how this world works.
What about Germany or Russia? You think Chinese live in the Moscow area before the Slavic? Or black people in Berlin?
"Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (pictured) denies the Holocaust of Jews in Europe, calling it a "myth". "
Sorry, this is biased news. Do we see a top headline every time a Western president says something ignorant about gays, colonialism, communism, or whatever else they are prejudiced about? Mention it in the article about the Iranian President, sure, but wiki news should not be a mouthpiece for targeted propaganda such as this. (Not that it's not true, but it's "newsworthy" as the US/Europe are mounting a campaign against Iran.) Dan Carkner 18:04, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Iran has stolen nuclear bomb plans; and likely materials from Pakistan as well -- those in turn were stolen -- that leads back finally to the orginal theft from Jewish(Ironic?) communists fenced to the Soviets. Remarks by the Iranian president, given the willfull use of stolen nuclear secrets that could shed light upon their intentions, is legitimate news.
Unias 18:00, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Yes. They are for real. Look at the URLs! -- EMS | Talk 21:20, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
I believe people have the right to expres themselves and are entitled to their opinions. This is a free world and we must strive to keep it free.
--- no one cears about that sort of stuff, so it's not a headline.--
Per Wikipedia style, shouldn't "Beautiful Boy", as a song title, be in quotes rather than italicized? I'd fix it, but, well, I'm not allowed. Scarequotes 03:32, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Shoe polish? What the hell? CrazyAussie 04:46, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Despite the blurb on today's (Dec 15 2005), "Kiwi" was not "the first modern shoe polish". The German brand "Erdal" was patented in 1901. Kar98 16:44, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
OK so when I designed this, patterning my uncyc User Page after the Wikipedia Main Page, which I undersatnd lots of people do, I noticed I really didn't like the pnk color for the Featured article section to be on my User Page. Then I took a closer look at the Wikipedia main page and realized, heck I don't like it there either! It's ugly as hell! Green would look so much better, and as it does here. So, uh, yeah. That's my suggestion. A minor shift in the color scheme. -- Nerd42 05:49, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
well thw title says it all!!!
Why? -- Vagodin 11:05, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
As well written as it may be, "shoe polish" is a horribly boring subject for a "Featured Article". How many people are really like "Gee, I wish I knew more about shoe polish!" Just my 2 cents. :) Trojanpony 08:45, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Yes, I know. Nearly every time I go on Wikipedia the featured article is interesting.. not today.
Maybe the guy who does the F.A got Christmas and April Fools confused? CrazyAussie 09:59, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Actually, this is precisely the sort of article I think shows the diversity of Wikipedia. I enjoy seeing articles here that are a bit unexpected. Not everything that is a featured article needs to be groundbreaking, after all. - Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 10:39, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
I'm not asking for groundbreaking, just interesting. I think there usually is a good amount of diversity in the FA's. Something like "shoe polish" doesn't really "showcase" anything, frankly. You could find a good entry on shoe polish in any standard encyclopedia. FA's often highlight articles you won't find in a typical encyclopedia. I think these go a lot further to showcase the strength of Wikipedia. Trojanpony 13:48, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Despite the blurb on today's (Dec 15 2005), "Kiwi" was not "the first modern shoe polish". The German brand "Erdal" was patented in 1901 Kar98 16:45, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia is made so we can learn about stuff we normaly would'nt seek out. Hagamaba 19:30, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
I have to agree with the general feeling of disgust regarding the pedestrian nature of the featured article. Hagamaba said, "Wikipedia is made so we can learn about stuff we normaly would'nt seek out". Unless we have interesting featured articles then nobody will bother to seek out wikipedia's front page at all. This is all very reminicient of the kind of mindless frivilousness where some university students waste time & resources reasearching 'The probability of toast falling butterside down on the kitchen floor' or something equally useless. There are some truely fascinating articles within wikipedia, the like of which, cannot be found elsewhere. Feature them! instead of degrading the reputation of wikipedia. Whoever chose this as an FA, did you think it was funny? Is there some cutesy sweetness about it? Is it quirky & eccentric? Infact, it's none of these things. It's just tedious. When i want a laugh i'll goto badgas. When i want knowledge i come here. Please keep this the best place to come.
Veej
22:51, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
As I said with Tom Brinkman who featured recently, there is a case for including seemingly minor subjects - the serendipity factor. (Having a major and a minor topic would fill up too much of the main page.
Jackiespeel 14:18, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Is the main criterion for a featured article that it corresponds to the various policies on what makes a good article and the Manual of Style? If so, I have to say Wikipedia is disappearing up its own rectum a bit. It's all very well to showcase Wikipedia's virtues, but if an article is boring (not 'obscure' - shoe polish is no more obscure than toothpaste or toilet cleaner, it's just an everyday object) then people won't read it and won't learn anything about Wikipedia. -- Last Malthusian 16:37, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
If it's interesting articles (rather than particularly well-written ones), take a gander at Wikipedia:Unusual articles. GeeJo (t) (c) • 25-07-2024 06:58 (UTC) 17:22, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Not sure how to sort this, but someone has created the page interbang, which is clearly a misremembering of interrabang. Could someone with powers and knowledge clean this up?14:09, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Can some of the text be archived (or is year's end a better point)?
I just removed a large picture of a penis from the featured article on Shoe polish. A day or two ago I saw a picture of an American murderer in place of the Iranian president (since replaced). So, editors-in-chief or whatever it is called around here, please pull off your gloves and grab your batons. Cheerio Io 19:48, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Hey, you're still using wiki species logo 4 at the bottom, but logo 6 was picked so they say. Metarhyme 03:56, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
I amended the introduction to remove the parentheses on the article. Could this be updated in the template for the main page? -- Natalinasmpf 04:42, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Um, can an administrator please give me a response on whether is this going to be done, and if not, why so? I did amend the introduction of the article itself, but this of course, should be updated in the main page entry. Can this be done, please? -- Natalinasmpf 05:58, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Put
"The House of Commons is the lower house of the Canadian Parliament, and holds far more power than the Senate, the upper house, and is in practice, by far the dominant House of Parliament"
to replace
Natalinasmpf 06:05, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Did we not just have a featured article on this? Jeff24 5 06:24, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
I observed that the main page no longer labels Wikipedia as a "free-content" encylopedia, although the simple layout and article on Wikipedia are still consistent in that regard. I read the talk page on the {{ MainPageIntro}} template, and it seems the reason for this change was because of a statement by Jimbo Wales, but this statement is no longer linked from any page, other than 7 talk pages. I feel that this is a major oversight, because there is a major difference between free and free content. [1]. Either the main page should link to free content, as it did before, or it should link to Jimbo's statement. At least, that's my view on the matter. Signed, Blu Aardvark | (talk) | (contribs) 04:23, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Should a flag be used to represent Iraq while the state of the flag is in flux? To retain a NPOV, shouldn't a map be used instead? —the preceding unsigned comment is by 66.245.12.91 ( talk • contribs) 06:18, 16 December 2005
"there are more than hundred" should be changed to "a hundred" or "one hundred". BrainyBroad 16:48, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
It is upto the people of Iraq to debate and decide on such matters the US the UN or anyone else has nothing to useful to offer in this department
How upsetting for Russia, to find that the people of Iraq get to decide on matters about their nature reserves :-) 14:40, 19 December 2005 (UTC) (Skittle)
Jimbo, Mav and others would like the fundraising notice to be more prominent, and since doing it on every page will annoy most people, doing it only on the Main Page seems like the best choice. Since we can't remove the current message from the Main Page, the new message will have to supplement the current message.
Any suggestions? — 0918 BRIAN • 2005-12-16 20:02
A Christmas Carol is hardly a short story. It is described in its article as a novella. Can the anniversaries section be changed to match please? CalJW 00:21, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
Is it fair to flatly state "illegal domestic wiretaps"? The NSA article itself states that:
NSA's United States Signals Intelligence Directive 18 (USSID 18) strictly prohibits the interception or collection of information about "...US persons, entities, corporations or organizations..." without explicit written legal permission from the Attorney General of the United States. The Supreme Court has ruled that intelligence agencies cannot conduct surveillance against American citizens. There are of course a few extreme circumstances where collecting on a US entity would be allowed without a USSID 18 waiver, such as with civilian distress signals, or sudden emergencies (such as 9/11; however, the USA PATRIOT Act has significantly changed privacy legality).
If such permission was granted (which is currently unknown, to my knowledge) then they wouldn't be illegal. -- SVTCobra 00:28, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks, for the fix. "Warrentless" good choice of words. -- SVTCobra 00:35, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
Please add "sometime in 2004" to this blurb; as presently written, it sounds like the event itself is current news. Doops | talk 01:11, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
Irrelevent point removed by user after re-reading article. Woops! vcxlor 06:43, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
An OpenSource Encyclopedia (that word isnt patented is it?) obviously has great benefits, information by people, in fluent appropriate and targeted for people. But vandelism is rife and is threat to the greater credibility of this site. A discussion on implementing a system of ranking and scoring in relation to user/TOPICS/Profession is required, currently I'm a computer technician, i don't know anything about Medicine however i can change the greatest medical advancement penicillin to panadol if i wanted.
Suggestion: Each article should have ability for the reader to rate the information in each section as good or bad. every good vote will increase how reputible the Author and Information they post on a scale. a bad mark increases the chance that someone will out rank you and edit or possibly replace your Info.
Conclusion: We do need to stop cross contamination (Self Proclaimed experts from destroying quality and reputable Experts Say) and general Vandelism. Though this system will be possible to exploit, Will the time and effort required for a bad egg to acquire a good Quality Knowledge rank justify general annoyances they aim to cause?
the point is prevention is always better than cure and yes fixing some inconsiderate users statements do waste people time and even pollutes some peoples minds.
Ah, I for example, know barely anything about special relativity. I however, can copyedit the article, revert vandalism and fix spelling. Turning this into a vote system is ridiculous. -- Natalinasmpf 15:35, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Please see my comment on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Main_Page_banner#This_looks_HUGE
Thanks, Msoos 10:36, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
Hey, i was just navitagting amoung the various wikifoundations projects, esspecially between wikimedia and wikipedia, and found it close to impossible to transfer between the various projects seemlessly.
I have a few idea to make the bonds between the projects stronger, and ease the navigation between them for the average user
1. Links in the navigation area to the left of the average wikifoundation project. Such as a list of project links under the search box.
2. Links to each project at the bottom of the average page
3. A universal navigation bar (think blogger) at the top of each projects template.
Also, along with the search and go buttons, another search button to search across all the projects would be handy.
George Bush leads to a disambiguation page. It should be changed to George W. Bush on the main page. - Cuivienen 16:22, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
The statement "President George Bush admits he ordered the National Security Agency to spy against US citizens in the United States without a warrant, currently against US law" is false. Bush has neither confirmed or denied the reports. 200.119.236.249 16:28, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
Was it really secreat?Did Senator Rockerfellow of the intellagence committee know about it? Did the judge that oversees such things know about it? Did the entire intellagence committee know about it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.195.141.217 ( talk • contribs) .
They weren't particually spying on all civilians, it was to be used as intellegence- sources include former Iragi and Tallaban leaders, and Palistinian, Iragi, Serian, and Egyptian immigrants. And just so u know CNN has changed the title of their article to "Denies" to "Refuses to Comment". And yes, if you have seen the house and congress results it is said that presedent and his cabinet had the right to spy without a warrent.-- 68.198.48.71 15:18, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Copied from Template talk:In the news because it seems that no one read that page:
The 900 protestors are "detained", not arrested. So far only ~10 people have been arrested. [3]
And the "worst violence in 16 years". Where does that figure come from? This probably refers to the reaction in Hong Kong to the 1989 Tiananmen protest, in which no street violence happened at all. The worst street violence should goes back to 1967. -- Lorenzarius 16:56, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
I'm just wondering -- how is the fundraiser reminder on the Main Page (not the one at the top of all pages) generated? I don't see relevant code or edits on the Main Page or {{ MainPageIntro}}... -- WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:12, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
I didn't know where to post this message since I obviously can't post it at the Wikimedia pages, as I do not have an account, and I cannot create one as of now. The Create an Account gives a title, along with the note that would normally indicate which fields are necessary to fill in. Somebody should get the service up and running again.
The reason I wanted to create an account at Wikimedia is to ask exactly how people from Russia are able to donate to Wikimedia, as both PayPal and Moneybookers do not support the Russian Ruble. And there is a Russian donation page. Just wondering.
Now I guess that all I need to know is how somebody would send money to the Wikimedia Foundation in Russia, as a Russian Donation page has not been made. Again, I'm just wondering.
To any admins paying attention: Under the In the news heading (the George W. Bush/NSA bit), the link to warrant should point to warrant (law), or maybe writ. Deltabeignet 07:00, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
Why is it that the Bolivian flag on the Spanish Wikipedia is different (it doesn't have the crest)? Yellowmellow45 16:09, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
The correct term is "string instruments", as "string" is an adjective modifying "instruments". It is correct in the article. Soobrickay 11:53, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Following recent events which resulted in the Wikipedia policy change, apparently one news website had an entry (for a while) that Narnia had left the WTO talks in a huff - spokeswoman Susan Aslan. Jackiespeel 13:38, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
The main page blurb for featured article U.S. Navy Marine Mammal Program links to Speculation, but the word refers to general speculation, whereas the article is on economic speculation only. Perhaps an interwiki link to wiktionary:Speculation would have been better.
JamesHoadley 18:00, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
The DYK about St petersburg bridge says it makes communication between the island and the city impossible, the article just says it makes foot travel impossible.
Shouldn't the term Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District be in bold text, not intelligent design? Intelligent design isn't the news topic being reported. -- Bryan Nguyen | Talk 02:19, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
I've bolded both the case name and "intelligent design". This keeps everyone happy, and also will hopefully spurn more edits to the case article, which needs to a "more polished article", to borrow language from above. Harro 5 03:29, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Should the New York City Mass Transit Union Strike be in the news? The MTA transports 2.4 billion customers every year, and the stoppage of such large amounts of people should count for something. 2005 New York City transit strike Ian Manka Questions? Talk to me! 05:56, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Actually, here in England, it appeared on the evening news on all networks.
Yellowmellow45
10:14, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Born in Auckland New Zealand in 1973, attended Auckland Grammar School and Auckland University. Completed a Science Degree in 2001.
Won the Mistral Dnghy world championships in 1995
Moved to Sydney in Dec 2000. Began DJing in 2001 with first gigs in 2002. DJ name Gobbles. Best known as the second half of "Snowpea & Gobbles"
He is now living in Hampstead in London.
PM Ariel Sharon was released from hospital please update in the news to say that -- A dam1213 Talk + 11:08, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Someone has suggested that these portal links be added to the main page introduction. I think that it's a great idea, but adding these two links stretches the introduction a bit too much. Anyone got any ideas on how to resolve this issue? See Template talk:MainPageIntro for more information. -- Ixfd64 04:44, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
I am the computer talking and i would like to discuss the important things about me!!!
Quite selfish this computer or should i say egocentric 16:21, 22 December 2005
Has no one noticed that the thumbnail on the front page has been replaced by Orko from He-Man? I don't know how to fix it, otherwise I would. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/d/d4/Captainmarvel.JPG/100px-Captainmarvel.JPG - Seinfreak37 17:03, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
No sooner did I post this did someone correct the problem. Thanks! - Seinfreak37 17:05, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
I misread one of my sources and it was East Carolina that was making it's first bowl experience in 16 seasons, not Illinois. It's fixed now and Could there be another emergency fact from the article.
In 1994 Greg Landry was a key reason why University of Illinois had the second best passing offense in the Big Ten, which eventually carried the team to a 30-0 win in the Liberty Bowl over East Carolina, which was making its first bowl appearance in 16 seasons.
Or any other fact, for the matter or just remove it as I made the stupid mistake of misreading the source and now. Sorry for the problem -- Jaranda wat's sup 18:13, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
The new york transit strike is officaly over, so somebody please change that on the main page.
I have an idea! We could have the featured article for wikipedia's 5th anniversary be wikipedia. -- Wookiebaca 21:54, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
There are two donation banners on the main page. They both have links to Fundraising#donation_methods and Deductibility_of_donations. Since space at the top of the main page is so valuable, could we change the wording to remove this repetition? -- Heron 10:43, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
MTA service has now been fully restored [4]. The news item will need to be updated. -- Cam 16:15, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
OK, everybody knows that featured articles are frequently vandalized, and one of the more common infantile tricks is to insert some image, usually a penis, in the featured article. These are always quickly reverted, but I wonder why the offensive images remain in the article's edit history. For example, somebody inserted a photo of masturbation in today's featured article on Joseph Smith, and it is still visible when you get back that far in the "compare selected versions." Isn't there a way to just indicate what the vandal did (as is done with the ID of the image), and to remove the actual image itself from the article's history? In general, that's a big problem with these "selected versions" in the article history--that things like this remain and aren't completely removed/disassociated with the article. MahlerFan 20:33, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Nice to see that Tycho's Nova was "first observed on November 11." Of course, you don't mention that it was November 11, 1572. You'll get people searching the sky 433 years too late! 24.64.223.203 01:40, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
or holiday spirit? i thnk there should be a santa hat on the wikipedia logo that would be awesome!!! —the preceding unsigned comment is by Jordantheking ( talk • contribs)
yeah exactly. all that "polital acceptance" or whatever its called is stupid. just people that want it there way. —the preceding unsigned comment is by Jordantheking ( talk • contribs)
User:Angela has a few such logos on her user page. Which, IMHO, is the appropriate place for them. How would you feel if the main page was redecorated in honor of a Wiccan, Communist, or Muslim holiday? There's people out there who feel the same way about Christianity. -- Pak aran 05:01, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
I can see that the actual Ido article contains a link to the Esperanto article, but I noticed that the FA's summary intro on the main page is missing the Esperanto link. Since both languages are so closely related (linguistically and historically), I think it might be appropriate to hyperlink "Esperanto" on the main page as well. Any takers? Rod ESQ 00:31, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
All right, I see some diligent soul took up the task. I'd like to thank the anonymous editor for the modification. Merry festivities all around! Rod ESQ 06:07, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
Where did our information about Sudan and Chad being at war come from? I can find no mention of it at either the FOX News or the MSNBC websites. Is this accurate? Would whoever put that announcement up please indicate their source of information? Roy Al Blue 01:08, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
You mean to say that the world news coverage of the major US networks is sub-par?!?!?!? how can that be?!?!?!!? Bwithh 05:56, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
This is not true. First, his name was Romulus Augustus, not Romulus Augustulus, second, the last emperor was Julius Nepos.-- Nixer 16:31, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
It must have gotten really popular without me knowing. I first thought it was just an attempt by someone to use Wikipedia as a soapboax to promote a non-notable holiday they want more people to celebrate, but now I realize that that supposition was completely unjustified. I'm so glad no one's trying to use Wikipedia as a soapbox. MrVoluntarist 20:48, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
Well, I guess I overestimated the ability of those here to detect sarcasm. MrVoluntarist 00:25, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
The top item of the "In the news" section is currently the one about the Supreme Court of Libya. The verb in this sentence is overturned, which is in past tense and does not match the tense of all of the others (such as declares and finds). Aaron Jacobs 05:15, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Same deal today, with "Andrey Illarionov, top economic advisor to Russian President Vladimir Putin, resigns after saying that Russia was 'no longer a democratic country.'" The tense changes in mid-sentence. Encyclopedia editors really should be better schooled in basic grammar. anon 02:38, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Why is Kwanzaa not up there with Boxing Day and Wren's Day? appzter 18:42, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
The "best seat in the house" is rather "defined" than is "discovered", since "best" is so subjective. -- Fplay 21:20, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Despite the large number of English speakers who have increased Wikipedia to almost a million articles, simple English grows very slowly (about 6000 articles). Could simple English be featured on the main page? We might get some more editors that way. Roger 22:58, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
I think it might be a good idea to feature a Portal on the main page, a new one every week. It could just be a simple text link and a one link description of what the portal is about. Portals are kind of a new thing on Wikipedia and they haven't received much attention because barely anyone knows about them. That said, I think they have the potential to grow into something very useful. Linking to them from the main page would definitely help. Comments? -- Cyde Weys vote talk 21:45, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
I remember seeing sealand on a list of weird articles. Where can I find this list at? schyler 00:29, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
In Did you know, "whos" should be "whose". AnonMoos
Thanks, already fixed. -- grm_wnr Esc 02:53, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
Testing updates...
Were the knights freelancing or under orders? As far as I know, that's still an open question; we shouldn't take sides. I recommend: ...by knights eager to please Henry II of England or something like that. Doops | talk 08:42, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Done now. Harro 5 23:43, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Seriously, are there no administrators on main page patrol anymore? Scanning this page there are numerous instances of proposed fixes which got no administrator attention at all and passed into history unaddressed. Doops | talk 19:36, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Hoping to start a discussion on the recent attack on the premier and reputed Indian Institute of Science, Banglore. Wondering if this and other frequent attacks in India i.e anytime anywhere attacks, are part of a larger problem ? Problems like illegal immigration, archaic laws, corruption, and I guess incomepetent government. To me it looks like our government's inability and unwillingness to accept the problem due to political compulsion and take on the problem head on. Here is what I mean
1. We have real issue of illegal immegration from Bangladesh. We have uncontrolled influence of foreign charity who in the name of helping poor are exploting them for their own larger cause but our government being "secular" is somewhat keep pushing the issue to the backburner as this is considere politically incorrect and controversial.
2. We have issue of incompetency in every agency of the government be it intelligence, police, beaurocracy but even inspite of repeated attacks all over, the government keeps denying the fact that this is an intelligence failure. To me unless you recognize and accept the problem you will never be able to resolve it.
3. Another issue is regarding our archaic law many of which where formulated under the raj. Again I guess due to political compulsion and the fear of rattling some political can of worm, our government has been dragging its feet on bringing some tough laws. Even the one enacted by BJP like POTA government seems unwilling to use them in the fear creating controversies.
The Pictured does not appear on the main page identifying the man in the history section. J.Steinbock 02:30, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
In the did you know section for Wilson Peak, "appearence" should be "appearance". Graham/pianoman87 talk 03:35, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 45 | ← | Archive 49 | Archive 50 | Archive 51 | Archive 52 | Archive 53 | → | Archive 55 |
I am a CanadianI would like to thank the Wikipedia editors for featuring a great deal of Canadian content on the Main Page. Canada's contributions to the world are often overlooked because of our own pre-occupation with our internal problems (e.g. Quebec secession, regionalism in general), and the fact that we seem to suffer from a inferiority complex due to our proximity to the United States. In other words, we don't do a good job of "selling ourselves," and thus don't give much of a reason for others to notice what we've done.
Part of the problem is that Canadians are not well educated in their own history and hence do not have a good understanding of the relative worth of our contributions. Hopefully, via Wikipedia, the world (Canadians included) will have a better idea of Canada's small but significant role on the international scene in the past and in the present. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lonesome road ( talk • contribs) .
We do however, have a lot of trees. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.34.68.10 ( talk • contribs) .
(more canadian content!!!) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.70.95.203 ( talk • contribs) ..
Along with Canadian 'contributions,' though, Canadians should be schooled in some of the less pleasant parts of Canadian history and society. Residential schools, Japanese internment, a cozy relationship with Suharto, Saskatchewan Uranium being used for armour-piercing bullets in the first Gulf War (and the tons of radioactive bullets that now litter the Iraq landscape), and current racial tensions (Saskatoon police officers leaving aboriginals out to die in the cold...) need to be discussed before we sink into a cacophony of smug and self-congratulatory national pride.
-- Subbevil 16:57, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
From your text it seems Canada is the only country which has done something wrong. All countries can be accused of something bad. That's not the point. Canada's problem is, as stated, its border with the US who simply dumb them down all the time for no reason (I am shocked at the amount of absolutely bold statements about Canada in American films/series/music etc. Everyone seems to forget that neither Americans nor Canadians actually belong where they live now thus there is no place for pride.
-- Guest 16:57, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
For thousands of years it has worked this way: You defeat a nation (or a people), you take there land, it is now yours. It was this way when we came to America's. We defeated the indians, and therefore the land is now ours. Thats how it has worked for THOUSANDS of years, and that is how it worked in that regard. Are you also going to say other pieces of conquered land in England are not theres? How bout Germany? Russia? Your statment was ingnorant of how this world works.
What about Germany or Russia? You think Chinese live in the Moscow area before the Slavic? Or black people in Berlin?
"Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (pictured) denies the Holocaust of Jews in Europe, calling it a "myth". "
Sorry, this is biased news. Do we see a top headline every time a Western president says something ignorant about gays, colonialism, communism, or whatever else they are prejudiced about? Mention it in the article about the Iranian President, sure, but wiki news should not be a mouthpiece for targeted propaganda such as this. (Not that it's not true, but it's "newsworthy" as the US/Europe are mounting a campaign against Iran.) Dan Carkner 18:04, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Iran has stolen nuclear bomb plans; and likely materials from Pakistan as well -- those in turn were stolen -- that leads back finally to the orginal theft from Jewish(Ironic?) communists fenced to the Soviets. Remarks by the Iranian president, given the willfull use of stolen nuclear secrets that could shed light upon their intentions, is legitimate news.
Unias 18:00, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Yes. They are for real. Look at the URLs! -- EMS | Talk 21:20, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
I believe people have the right to expres themselves and are entitled to their opinions. This is a free world and we must strive to keep it free.
--- no one cears about that sort of stuff, so it's not a headline.--
Per Wikipedia style, shouldn't "Beautiful Boy", as a song title, be in quotes rather than italicized? I'd fix it, but, well, I'm not allowed. Scarequotes 03:32, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Shoe polish? What the hell? CrazyAussie 04:46, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Despite the blurb on today's (Dec 15 2005), "Kiwi" was not "the first modern shoe polish". The German brand "Erdal" was patented in 1901. Kar98 16:44, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
OK so when I designed this, patterning my uncyc User Page after the Wikipedia Main Page, which I undersatnd lots of people do, I noticed I really didn't like the pnk color for the Featured article section to be on my User Page. Then I took a closer look at the Wikipedia main page and realized, heck I don't like it there either! It's ugly as hell! Green would look so much better, and as it does here. So, uh, yeah. That's my suggestion. A minor shift in the color scheme. -- Nerd42 05:49, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
well thw title says it all!!!
Why? -- Vagodin 11:05, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
As well written as it may be, "shoe polish" is a horribly boring subject for a "Featured Article". How many people are really like "Gee, I wish I knew more about shoe polish!" Just my 2 cents. :) Trojanpony 08:45, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Yes, I know. Nearly every time I go on Wikipedia the featured article is interesting.. not today.
Maybe the guy who does the F.A got Christmas and April Fools confused? CrazyAussie 09:59, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Actually, this is precisely the sort of article I think shows the diversity of Wikipedia. I enjoy seeing articles here that are a bit unexpected. Not everything that is a featured article needs to be groundbreaking, after all. - Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 10:39, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
I'm not asking for groundbreaking, just interesting. I think there usually is a good amount of diversity in the FA's. Something like "shoe polish" doesn't really "showcase" anything, frankly. You could find a good entry on shoe polish in any standard encyclopedia. FA's often highlight articles you won't find in a typical encyclopedia. I think these go a lot further to showcase the strength of Wikipedia. Trojanpony 13:48, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Despite the blurb on today's (Dec 15 2005), "Kiwi" was not "the first modern shoe polish". The German brand "Erdal" was patented in 1901 Kar98 16:45, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia is made so we can learn about stuff we normaly would'nt seek out. Hagamaba 19:30, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
I have to agree with the general feeling of disgust regarding the pedestrian nature of the featured article. Hagamaba said, "Wikipedia is made so we can learn about stuff we normaly would'nt seek out". Unless we have interesting featured articles then nobody will bother to seek out wikipedia's front page at all. This is all very reminicient of the kind of mindless frivilousness where some university students waste time & resources reasearching 'The probability of toast falling butterside down on the kitchen floor' or something equally useless. There are some truely fascinating articles within wikipedia, the like of which, cannot be found elsewhere. Feature them! instead of degrading the reputation of wikipedia. Whoever chose this as an FA, did you think it was funny? Is there some cutesy sweetness about it? Is it quirky & eccentric? Infact, it's none of these things. It's just tedious. When i want a laugh i'll goto badgas. When i want knowledge i come here. Please keep this the best place to come.
Veej
22:51, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
As I said with Tom Brinkman who featured recently, there is a case for including seemingly minor subjects - the serendipity factor. (Having a major and a minor topic would fill up too much of the main page.
Jackiespeel 14:18, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Is the main criterion for a featured article that it corresponds to the various policies on what makes a good article and the Manual of Style? If so, I have to say Wikipedia is disappearing up its own rectum a bit. It's all very well to showcase Wikipedia's virtues, but if an article is boring (not 'obscure' - shoe polish is no more obscure than toothpaste or toilet cleaner, it's just an everyday object) then people won't read it and won't learn anything about Wikipedia. -- Last Malthusian 16:37, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
If it's interesting articles (rather than particularly well-written ones), take a gander at Wikipedia:Unusual articles. GeeJo (t) (c) • 25-07-2024 06:58 (UTC) 17:22, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Not sure how to sort this, but someone has created the page interbang, which is clearly a misremembering of interrabang. Could someone with powers and knowledge clean this up?14:09, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Can some of the text be archived (or is year's end a better point)?
I just removed a large picture of a penis from the featured article on Shoe polish. A day or two ago I saw a picture of an American murderer in place of the Iranian president (since replaced). So, editors-in-chief or whatever it is called around here, please pull off your gloves and grab your batons. Cheerio Io 19:48, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Hey, you're still using wiki species logo 4 at the bottom, but logo 6 was picked so they say. Metarhyme 03:56, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
I amended the introduction to remove the parentheses on the article. Could this be updated in the template for the main page? -- Natalinasmpf 04:42, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Um, can an administrator please give me a response on whether is this going to be done, and if not, why so? I did amend the introduction of the article itself, but this of course, should be updated in the main page entry. Can this be done, please? -- Natalinasmpf 05:58, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Put
"The House of Commons is the lower house of the Canadian Parliament, and holds far more power than the Senate, the upper house, and is in practice, by far the dominant House of Parliament"
to replace
Natalinasmpf 06:05, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Did we not just have a featured article on this? Jeff24 5 06:24, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
I observed that the main page no longer labels Wikipedia as a "free-content" encylopedia, although the simple layout and article on Wikipedia are still consistent in that regard. I read the talk page on the {{ MainPageIntro}} template, and it seems the reason for this change was because of a statement by Jimbo Wales, but this statement is no longer linked from any page, other than 7 talk pages. I feel that this is a major oversight, because there is a major difference between free and free content. [1]. Either the main page should link to free content, as it did before, or it should link to Jimbo's statement. At least, that's my view on the matter. Signed, Blu Aardvark | (talk) | (contribs) 04:23, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Should a flag be used to represent Iraq while the state of the flag is in flux? To retain a NPOV, shouldn't a map be used instead? —the preceding unsigned comment is by 66.245.12.91 ( talk • contribs) 06:18, 16 December 2005
"there are more than hundred" should be changed to "a hundred" or "one hundred". BrainyBroad 16:48, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
It is upto the people of Iraq to debate and decide on such matters the US the UN or anyone else has nothing to useful to offer in this department
How upsetting for Russia, to find that the people of Iraq get to decide on matters about their nature reserves :-) 14:40, 19 December 2005 (UTC) (Skittle)
Jimbo, Mav and others would like the fundraising notice to be more prominent, and since doing it on every page will annoy most people, doing it only on the Main Page seems like the best choice. Since we can't remove the current message from the Main Page, the new message will have to supplement the current message.
Any suggestions? — 0918 BRIAN • 2005-12-16 20:02
A Christmas Carol is hardly a short story. It is described in its article as a novella. Can the anniversaries section be changed to match please? CalJW 00:21, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
Is it fair to flatly state "illegal domestic wiretaps"? The NSA article itself states that:
NSA's United States Signals Intelligence Directive 18 (USSID 18) strictly prohibits the interception or collection of information about "...US persons, entities, corporations or organizations..." without explicit written legal permission from the Attorney General of the United States. The Supreme Court has ruled that intelligence agencies cannot conduct surveillance against American citizens. There are of course a few extreme circumstances where collecting on a US entity would be allowed without a USSID 18 waiver, such as with civilian distress signals, or sudden emergencies (such as 9/11; however, the USA PATRIOT Act has significantly changed privacy legality).
If such permission was granted (which is currently unknown, to my knowledge) then they wouldn't be illegal. -- SVTCobra 00:28, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks, for the fix. "Warrentless" good choice of words. -- SVTCobra 00:35, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
Please add "sometime in 2004" to this blurb; as presently written, it sounds like the event itself is current news. Doops | talk 01:11, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
Irrelevent point removed by user after re-reading article. Woops! vcxlor 06:43, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
An OpenSource Encyclopedia (that word isnt patented is it?) obviously has great benefits, information by people, in fluent appropriate and targeted for people. But vandelism is rife and is threat to the greater credibility of this site. A discussion on implementing a system of ranking and scoring in relation to user/TOPICS/Profession is required, currently I'm a computer technician, i don't know anything about Medicine however i can change the greatest medical advancement penicillin to panadol if i wanted.
Suggestion: Each article should have ability for the reader to rate the information in each section as good or bad. every good vote will increase how reputible the Author and Information they post on a scale. a bad mark increases the chance that someone will out rank you and edit or possibly replace your Info.
Conclusion: We do need to stop cross contamination (Self Proclaimed experts from destroying quality and reputable Experts Say) and general Vandelism. Though this system will be possible to exploit, Will the time and effort required for a bad egg to acquire a good Quality Knowledge rank justify general annoyances they aim to cause?
the point is prevention is always better than cure and yes fixing some inconsiderate users statements do waste people time and even pollutes some peoples minds.
Ah, I for example, know barely anything about special relativity. I however, can copyedit the article, revert vandalism and fix spelling. Turning this into a vote system is ridiculous. -- Natalinasmpf 15:35, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Please see my comment on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Main_Page_banner#This_looks_HUGE
Thanks, Msoos 10:36, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
Hey, i was just navitagting amoung the various wikifoundations projects, esspecially between wikimedia and wikipedia, and found it close to impossible to transfer between the various projects seemlessly.
I have a few idea to make the bonds between the projects stronger, and ease the navigation between them for the average user
1. Links in the navigation area to the left of the average wikifoundation project. Such as a list of project links under the search box.
2. Links to each project at the bottom of the average page
3. A universal navigation bar (think blogger) at the top of each projects template.
Also, along with the search and go buttons, another search button to search across all the projects would be handy.
George Bush leads to a disambiguation page. It should be changed to George W. Bush on the main page. - Cuivienen 16:22, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
The statement "President George Bush admits he ordered the National Security Agency to spy against US citizens in the United States without a warrant, currently against US law" is false. Bush has neither confirmed or denied the reports. 200.119.236.249 16:28, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
Was it really secreat?Did Senator Rockerfellow of the intellagence committee know about it? Did the judge that oversees such things know about it? Did the entire intellagence committee know about it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.195.141.217 ( talk • contribs) .
They weren't particually spying on all civilians, it was to be used as intellegence- sources include former Iragi and Tallaban leaders, and Palistinian, Iragi, Serian, and Egyptian immigrants. And just so u know CNN has changed the title of their article to "Denies" to "Refuses to Comment". And yes, if you have seen the house and congress results it is said that presedent and his cabinet had the right to spy without a warrent.-- 68.198.48.71 15:18, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Copied from Template talk:In the news because it seems that no one read that page:
The 900 protestors are "detained", not arrested. So far only ~10 people have been arrested. [3]
And the "worst violence in 16 years". Where does that figure come from? This probably refers to the reaction in Hong Kong to the 1989 Tiananmen protest, in which no street violence happened at all. The worst street violence should goes back to 1967. -- Lorenzarius 16:56, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
I'm just wondering -- how is the fundraiser reminder on the Main Page (not the one at the top of all pages) generated? I don't see relevant code or edits on the Main Page or {{ MainPageIntro}}... -- WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:12, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
I didn't know where to post this message since I obviously can't post it at the Wikimedia pages, as I do not have an account, and I cannot create one as of now. The Create an Account gives a title, along with the note that would normally indicate which fields are necessary to fill in. Somebody should get the service up and running again.
The reason I wanted to create an account at Wikimedia is to ask exactly how people from Russia are able to donate to Wikimedia, as both PayPal and Moneybookers do not support the Russian Ruble. And there is a Russian donation page. Just wondering.
Now I guess that all I need to know is how somebody would send money to the Wikimedia Foundation in Russia, as a Russian Donation page has not been made. Again, I'm just wondering.
To any admins paying attention: Under the In the news heading (the George W. Bush/NSA bit), the link to warrant should point to warrant (law), or maybe writ. Deltabeignet 07:00, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
Why is it that the Bolivian flag on the Spanish Wikipedia is different (it doesn't have the crest)? Yellowmellow45 16:09, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
The correct term is "string instruments", as "string" is an adjective modifying "instruments". It is correct in the article. Soobrickay 11:53, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Following recent events which resulted in the Wikipedia policy change, apparently one news website had an entry (for a while) that Narnia had left the WTO talks in a huff - spokeswoman Susan Aslan. Jackiespeel 13:38, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
The main page blurb for featured article U.S. Navy Marine Mammal Program links to Speculation, but the word refers to general speculation, whereas the article is on economic speculation only. Perhaps an interwiki link to wiktionary:Speculation would have been better.
JamesHoadley 18:00, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
The DYK about St petersburg bridge says it makes communication between the island and the city impossible, the article just says it makes foot travel impossible.
Shouldn't the term Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District be in bold text, not intelligent design? Intelligent design isn't the news topic being reported. -- Bryan Nguyen | Talk 02:19, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
I've bolded both the case name and "intelligent design". This keeps everyone happy, and also will hopefully spurn more edits to the case article, which needs to a "more polished article", to borrow language from above. Harro 5 03:29, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Should the New York City Mass Transit Union Strike be in the news? The MTA transports 2.4 billion customers every year, and the stoppage of such large amounts of people should count for something. 2005 New York City transit strike Ian Manka Questions? Talk to me! 05:56, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Actually, here in England, it appeared on the evening news on all networks.
Yellowmellow45
10:14, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Born in Auckland New Zealand in 1973, attended Auckland Grammar School and Auckland University. Completed a Science Degree in 2001.
Won the Mistral Dnghy world championships in 1995
Moved to Sydney in Dec 2000. Began DJing in 2001 with first gigs in 2002. DJ name Gobbles. Best known as the second half of "Snowpea & Gobbles"
He is now living in Hampstead in London.
PM Ariel Sharon was released from hospital please update in the news to say that -- A dam1213 Talk + 11:08, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Someone has suggested that these portal links be added to the main page introduction. I think that it's a great idea, but adding these two links stretches the introduction a bit too much. Anyone got any ideas on how to resolve this issue? See Template talk:MainPageIntro for more information. -- Ixfd64 04:44, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
I am the computer talking and i would like to discuss the important things about me!!!
Quite selfish this computer or should i say egocentric 16:21, 22 December 2005
Has no one noticed that the thumbnail on the front page has been replaced by Orko from He-Man? I don't know how to fix it, otherwise I would. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/d/d4/Captainmarvel.JPG/100px-Captainmarvel.JPG - Seinfreak37 17:03, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
No sooner did I post this did someone correct the problem. Thanks! - Seinfreak37 17:05, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
I misread one of my sources and it was East Carolina that was making it's first bowl experience in 16 seasons, not Illinois. It's fixed now and Could there be another emergency fact from the article.
In 1994 Greg Landry was a key reason why University of Illinois had the second best passing offense in the Big Ten, which eventually carried the team to a 30-0 win in the Liberty Bowl over East Carolina, which was making its first bowl appearance in 16 seasons.
Or any other fact, for the matter or just remove it as I made the stupid mistake of misreading the source and now. Sorry for the problem -- Jaranda wat's sup 18:13, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
The new york transit strike is officaly over, so somebody please change that on the main page.
I have an idea! We could have the featured article for wikipedia's 5th anniversary be wikipedia. -- Wookiebaca 21:54, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
There are two donation banners on the main page. They both have links to Fundraising#donation_methods and Deductibility_of_donations. Since space at the top of the main page is so valuable, could we change the wording to remove this repetition? -- Heron 10:43, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
MTA service has now been fully restored [4]. The news item will need to be updated. -- Cam 16:15, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
OK, everybody knows that featured articles are frequently vandalized, and one of the more common infantile tricks is to insert some image, usually a penis, in the featured article. These are always quickly reverted, but I wonder why the offensive images remain in the article's edit history. For example, somebody inserted a photo of masturbation in today's featured article on Joseph Smith, and it is still visible when you get back that far in the "compare selected versions." Isn't there a way to just indicate what the vandal did (as is done with the ID of the image), and to remove the actual image itself from the article's history? In general, that's a big problem with these "selected versions" in the article history--that things like this remain and aren't completely removed/disassociated with the article. MahlerFan 20:33, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Nice to see that Tycho's Nova was "first observed on November 11." Of course, you don't mention that it was November 11, 1572. You'll get people searching the sky 433 years too late! 24.64.223.203 01:40, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
or holiday spirit? i thnk there should be a santa hat on the wikipedia logo that would be awesome!!! —the preceding unsigned comment is by Jordantheking ( talk • contribs)
yeah exactly. all that "polital acceptance" or whatever its called is stupid. just people that want it there way. —the preceding unsigned comment is by Jordantheking ( talk • contribs)
User:Angela has a few such logos on her user page. Which, IMHO, is the appropriate place for them. How would you feel if the main page was redecorated in honor of a Wiccan, Communist, or Muslim holiday? There's people out there who feel the same way about Christianity. -- Pak aran 05:01, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
I can see that the actual Ido article contains a link to the Esperanto article, but I noticed that the FA's summary intro on the main page is missing the Esperanto link. Since both languages are so closely related (linguistically and historically), I think it might be appropriate to hyperlink "Esperanto" on the main page as well. Any takers? Rod ESQ 00:31, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
All right, I see some diligent soul took up the task. I'd like to thank the anonymous editor for the modification. Merry festivities all around! Rod ESQ 06:07, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
Where did our information about Sudan and Chad being at war come from? I can find no mention of it at either the FOX News or the MSNBC websites. Is this accurate? Would whoever put that announcement up please indicate their source of information? Roy Al Blue 01:08, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
You mean to say that the world news coverage of the major US networks is sub-par?!?!?!? how can that be?!?!?!!? Bwithh 05:56, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
This is not true. First, his name was Romulus Augustus, not Romulus Augustulus, second, the last emperor was Julius Nepos.-- Nixer 16:31, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
It must have gotten really popular without me knowing. I first thought it was just an attempt by someone to use Wikipedia as a soapboax to promote a non-notable holiday they want more people to celebrate, but now I realize that that supposition was completely unjustified. I'm so glad no one's trying to use Wikipedia as a soapbox. MrVoluntarist 20:48, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
Well, I guess I overestimated the ability of those here to detect sarcasm. MrVoluntarist 00:25, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
The top item of the "In the news" section is currently the one about the Supreme Court of Libya. The verb in this sentence is overturned, which is in past tense and does not match the tense of all of the others (such as declares and finds). Aaron Jacobs 05:15, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Same deal today, with "Andrey Illarionov, top economic advisor to Russian President Vladimir Putin, resigns after saying that Russia was 'no longer a democratic country.'" The tense changes in mid-sentence. Encyclopedia editors really should be better schooled in basic grammar. anon 02:38, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Why is Kwanzaa not up there with Boxing Day and Wren's Day? appzter 18:42, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
The "best seat in the house" is rather "defined" than is "discovered", since "best" is so subjective. -- Fplay 21:20, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Despite the large number of English speakers who have increased Wikipedia to almost a million articles, simple English grows very slowly (about 6000 articles). Could simple English be featured on the main page? We might get some more editors that way. Roger 22:58, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
I think it might be a good idea to feature a Portal on the main page, a new one every week. It could just be a simple text link and a one link description of what the portal is about. Portals are kind of a new thing on Wikipedia and they haven't received much attention because barely anyone knows about them. That said, I think they have the potential to grow into something very useful. Linking to them from the main page would definitely help. Comments? -- Cyde Weys vote talk 21:45, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
I remember seeing sealand on a list of weird articles. Where can I find this list at? schyler 00:29, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
In Did you know, "whos" should be "whose". AnonMoos
Thanks, already fixed. -- grm_wnr Esc 02:53, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
Testing updates...
Were the knights freelancing or under orders? As far as I know, that's still an open question; we shouldn't take sides. I recommend: ...by knights eager to please Henry II of England or something like that. Doops | talk 08:42, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Done now. Harro 5 23:43, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Seriously, are there no administrators on main page patrol anymore? Scanning this page there are numerous instances of proposed fixes which got no administrator attention at all and passed into history unaddressed. Doops | talk 19:36, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Hoping to start a discussion on the recent attack on the premier and reputed Indian Institute of Science, Banglore. Wondering if this and other frequent attacks in India i.e anytime anywhere attacks, are part of a larger problem ? Problems like illegal immigration, archaic laws, corruption, and I guess incomepetent government. To me it looks like our government's inability and unwillingness to accept the problem due to political compulsion and take on the problem head on. Here is what I mean
1. We have real issue of illegal immegration from Bangladesh. We have uncontrolled influence of foreign charity who in the name of helping poor are exploting them for their own larger cause but our government being "secular" is somewhat keep pushing the issue to the backburner as this is considere politically incorrect and controversial.
2. We have issue of incompetency in every agency of the government be it intelligence, police, beaurocracy but even inspite of repeated attacks all over, the government keeps denying the fact that this is an intelligence failure. To me unless you recognize and accept the problem you will never be able to resolve it.
3. Another issue is regarding our archaic law many of which where formulated under the raj. Again I guess due to political compulsion and the fear of rattling some political can of worm, our government has been dragging its feet on bringing some tough laws. Even the one enacted by BJP like POTA government seems unwilling to use them in the fear creating controversies.
The Pictured does not appear on the main page identifying the man in the history section. J.Steinbock 02:30, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
In the did you know section for Wilson Peak, "appearence" should be "appearance". Graham/pianoman87 talk 03:35, 30 December 2005 (UTC)