This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Maid in Malacañang article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can I ask if Heaven Peralejo is included in the cast or not, as her name is not cited in different news articles about this film. Recently, an IP user added her name in the cast, but after I opened the link that the user had cited, it appears that actress' name is not there. Thank you. NewManila2000 ( talk) 06:37, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
I’m sorry but the movie isn’t 90 minutes… it’s about 114 minutes… Ashroamswiki ( talk) 14:35, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Most people are searching "Maid in Malacanang" and not "Maid in Malacañang". Can we add Keywords replacing ENYE (ñ) Spanish character into English Alphabet N (n) because computer searching in Database will give different output or result. Rybaxs ( talk) 03:36, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
remove the word "fiction" on the first paragraph because its base on a true story and real history of the marcos family 130.105.154.59 ( talk) 18:46, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk)
21:53, 13 August 2022 (UTC)@ Chlod: Online polls are not equivalent to a critical reception. IMDb is not considered as reliable source due to its user-generated content, and I believe that ClickTheCity and Letterboxd is also on the same realm. There exists a number of reviews on the internet about the film, both negative and positive from reliable sources. I'm planning to add them. GinawaSaHapon ( talk) 00:30, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Review aggregation websites such as Rotten Tomatoes or Metacritic are citable for data pertaining to the ratio of positive to negative reviews. (When referencing Rotten Tomatoes, reference the score from All Critics, not Top Critics.) There is no community consensus about how to summarize Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic scores in writing; prevalent styles of summarizing or use of templates are not required to be followed.WP:AGG goes more in-depth, but is an essay. Anyways, that's not the primary concern in the first place; it's that your edit has no citations proving the existence or verifiability of the such a review. Content without citations have no guarantee of staying on-wiki and attempts at adding unsourced content is immediately removed during patrolling. This is moreso the case with reviews, as it involves quotes from living persons. Be more mindful of adding references; recent changes patrollers might not provide a more pleasant experience and revert with little explanation. Chlod ( say hi!) 00:49, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to remove the "Distribution of tickets to schools" as it has deadlinks and a single source bias. Did anyone already fact checked this? Thank you. Javeskie ( talk) 04:48, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
@ Phconcept Hello, I added the unreliable source tag in light of the fact that the box office numbers have not been reported or confirmed independently by sources who fit Wikipedia:Reliable sources. My concern lies with how Daryll Yap does have a vested interest in presenting the film as a success given that he is the films director. We are also unable to independently verify the true number of ticket sales generated by the film itself. However, given that this article is not a BLP and there seems to be no other source that rejects the 750 million peso figure I think it is fine to keep it as is but to at least note that the figure may not be entirely accurate.
Also if you had read my edit summary regarding the removal of the Ilocaknows source I also noted that it simply links to the Daryll Yap post which the article already uses as a source and thus seems redundant. So I really don't see a reason to even add it back. Firekiino ( talk) 11:17, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
I highly doubt this film is fictionalized, since I saw the footages of the events during the martial law and the presidency of Ferdinand Marcos. I also find some parts of the film to be based on what happened in real life. So, how is this film fictionalized? 4lepheus B4ron ( talk) 07:59, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Maid in Malacañang article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can I ask if Heaven Peralejo is included in the cast or not, as her name is not cited in different news articles about this film. Recently, an IP user added her name in the cast, but after I opened the link that the user had cited, it appears that actress' name is not there. Thank you. NewManila2000 ( talk) 06:37, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
I’m sorry but the movie isn’t 90 minutes… it’s about 114 minutes… Ashroamswiki ( talk) 14:35, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Most people are searching "Maid in Malacanang" and not "Maid in Malacañang". Can we add Keywords replacing ENYE (ñ) Spanish character into English Alphabet N (n) because computer searching in Database will give different output or result. Rybaxs ( talk) 03:36, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
remove the word "fiction" on the first paragraph because its base on a true story and real history of the marcos family 130.105.154.59 ( talk) 18:46, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk)
21:53, 13 August 2022 (UTC)@ Chlod: Online polls are not equivalent to a critical reception. IMDb is not considered as reliable source due to its user-generated content, and I believe that ClickTheCity and Letterboxd is also on the same realm. There exists a number of reviews on the internet about the film, both negative and positive from reliable sources. I'm planning to add them. GinawaSaHapon ( talk) 00:30, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Review aggregation websites such as Rotten Tomatoes or Metacritic are citable for data pertaining to the ratio of positive to negative reviews. (When referencing Rotten Tomatoes, reference the score from All Critics, not Top Critics.) There is no community consensus about how to summarize Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic scores in writing; prevalent styles of summarizing or use of templates are not required to be followed.WP:AGG goes more in-depth, but is an essay. Anyways, that's not the primary concern in the first place; it's that your edit has no citations proving the existence or verifiability of the such a review. Content without citations have no guarantee of staying on-wiki and attempts at adding unsourced content is immediately removed during patrolling. This is moreso the case with reviews, as it involves quotes from living persons. Be more mindful of adding references; recent changes patrollers might not provide a more pleasant experience and revert with little explanation. Chlod ( say hi!) 00:49, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to remove the "Distribution of tickets to schools" as it has deadlinks and a single source bias. Did anyone already fact checked this? Thank you. Javeskie ( talk) 04:48, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
@ Phconcept Hello, I added the unreliable source tag in light of the fact that the box office numbers have not been reported or confirmed independently by sources who fit Wikipedia:Reliable sources. My concern lies with how Daryll Yap does have a vested interest in presenting the film as a success given that he is the films director. We are also unable to independently verify the true number of ticket sales generated by the film itself. However, given that this article is not a BLP and there seems to be no other source that rejects the 750 million peso figure I think it is fine to keep it as is but to at least note that the figure may not be entirely accurate.
Also if you had read my edit summary regarding the removal of the Ilocaknows source I also noted that it simply links to the Daryll Yap post which the article already uses as a source and thus seems redundant. So I really don't see a reason to even add it back. Firekiino ( talk) 11:17, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
I highly doubt this film is fictionalized, since I saw the footages of the events during the martial law and the presidency of Ferdinand Marcos. I also find some parts of the film to be based on what happened in real life. So, how is this film fictionalized? 4lepheus B4ron ( talk) 07:59, 21 March 2023 (UTC)