![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I've often read of Sennett's Keystone studios, but keep seeing additional references to "Mack Sennett Studios" in Studio City, CA. (e.g. the Studio City's Chamber of Commerce Web page). Does anyone have any definitive information on this? Where would this fit within his timeline? Thanks so much! -- Shannontakita 15:38, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Apparently he moved to the San Fernando Valley in what would later be named "Studio City"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Studio_City,_Los_Angeles
"Studio City was created by the movie industry and earned its name in the 1920s when Mack Sennett moved his studios from a neighborhood known as Edendale (near modern Echo Park) to a property near Colfax Avenue and Ventura Boulevard." 76.95.209.135 ( talk) 04:23, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Image:Keystone Studios.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 14:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
This article needs a filmography. — SMcCandlish [ talk] [ cont] ‹(-¿-)› 04:43, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
I know that both Sennett's and Chaplin's memoirs are unreliable. But I believe it is generally accepted that Chaplin's first great films were produced by Sennett, but Chaplin believed he ought to be paid more than Sennett, and walked out, and moved on to Essanay. If confirmed, I feel that this aspect of the Sennett story should be featured. Valetude ( talk) 00:09, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Although Gloria Swanson worked for Sennett in 1916 and was photographed in a bathing suit, she... "vehemently denied" being one of the bathing beauties.
The introduction says Melbourne. The info box says Richmond. Is there a dispute? Are we trying to split the difference? OK by me, as it's far afield from my knowledge, but someone here might know the answer. Dratman ( talk) 01:28, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I've often read of Sennett's Keystone studios, but keep seeing additional references to "Mack Sennett Studios" in Studio City, CA. (e.g. the Studio City's Chamber of Commerce Web page). Does anyone have any definitive information on this? Where would this fit within his timeline? Thanks so much! -- Shannontakita 15:38, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Apparently he moved to the San Fernando Valley in what would later be named "Studio City"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Studio_City,_Los_Angeles
"Studio City was created by the movie industry and earned its name in the 1920s when Mack Sennett moved his studios from a neighborhood known as Edendale (near modern Echo Park) to a property near Colfax Avenue and Ventura Boulevard." 76.95.209.135 ( talk) 04:23, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Image:Keystone Studios.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 14:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
This article needs a filmography. — SMcCandlish [ talk] [ cont] ‹(-¿-)› 04:43, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
I know that both Sennett's and Chaplin's memoirs are unreliable. But I believe it is generally accepted that Chaplin's first great films were produced by Sennett, but Chaplin believed he ought to be paid more than Sennett, and walked out, and moved on to Essanay. If confirmed, I feel that this aspect of the Sennett story should be featured. Valetude ( talk) 00:09, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Although Gloria Swanson worked for Sennett in 1916 and was photographed in a bathing suit, she... "vehemently denied" being one of the bathing beauties.
The introduction says Melbourne. The info box says Richmond. Is there a dispute? Are we trying to split the difference? OK by me, as it's far afield from my knowledge, but someone here might know the answer. Dratman ( talk) 01:28, 17 September 2021 (UTC)