This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Maastricht Formation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This section contains pre-made code that can be copy and pasted into articles containing paleobiota tables. To save space, not all of the code is visible, additional code can be found by simply viewing this section's edit page.
Premade rowspans:
| rowspan="2" |
| rowspan="3" |
| rowspan="4" |
| rowspan="5" |
| rowspan="6" |
| rowspan="7" |
Replacement headings for "Presence" column
! Location
! Stratigraphic position
! Material
Replacement headings for "Taxa" column
The background colors of the cells are a means to communicate the relevant organism's taxonomic status.
Color key
|
Notes Uncertain or tentative taxa are in small text; |
Red for reclassified and preoccupied
|style="background:#fbdddb;" |
Purple for taxa falsely reported as present:
|style="background:#f3e9f3;" |
Dark grey for discredited taxa:
|style="background:#E6E6E6;" |
Peach for
Ichnotaxa:
|style="background:#FEF6E4;" |
Light blue for
Ootaxa:
|style="background:#E3F5FF;" |
Light green for
Morphotaxa:
|style="background:#D1FFCF;" |
According to the taxobox, the Maastricht Formation is dated 66–65.5 Ma. The Danian, according to the article on that stage, lasted from 66.0 to 61.6 Ma. Does this mean that there is no overlap between the Maastricht Formation and the Maastrichtian stage? Peter Brown ( talk) 23:44, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
I removed the picture because it is based on the imagination of one user. Dutch biologists see it as speculative. Only one bone of this species has been found . Moreover, it is uncertain if it is a species, and we know nothing about it, so there is no basis for a drawing like this, best regards HenriDuvent ( talk) 21:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Maastricht Formation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This section contains pre-made code that can be copy and pasted into articles containing paleobiota tables. To save space, not all of the code is visible, additional code can be found by simply viewing this section's edit page.
Premade rowspans:
| rowspan="2" |
| rowspan="3" |
| rowspan="4" |
| rowspan="5" |
| rowspan="6" |
| rowspan="7" |
Replacement headings for "Presence" column
! Location
! Stratigraphic position
! Material
Replacement headings for "Taxa" column
The background colors of the cells are a means to communicate the relevant organism's taxonomic status.
Color key
|
Notes Uncertain or tentative taxa are in small text; |
Red for reclassified and preoccupied
|style="background:#fbdddb;" |
Purple for taxa falsely reported as present:
|style="background:#f3e9f3;" |
Dark grey for discredited taxa:
|style="background:#E6E6E6;" |
Peach for
Ichnotaxa:
|style="background:#FEF6E4;" |
Light blue for
Ootaxa:
|style="background:#E3F5FF;" |
Light green for
Morphotaxa:
|style="background:#D1FFCF;" |
According to the taxobox, the Maastricht Formation is dated 66–65.5 Ma. The Danian, according to the article on that stage, lasted from 66.0 to 61.6 Ma. Does this mean that there is no overlap between the Maastricht Formation and the Maastrichtian stage? Peter Brown ( talk) 23:44, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
I removed the picture because it is based on the imagination of one user. Dutch biologists see it as speculative. Only one bone of this species has been found . Moreover, it is uncertain if it is a species, and we know nothing about it, so there is no basis for a drawing like this, best regards HenriDuvent ( talk) 21:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)