![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
|
|
The result of the debate was none
Maładečna →
Maladzechna – After the last four months of deadlock I would like to finally undue the original partisan move by
User:Monkbel per the consensus agreed in the discussion with Yuri above.
Kuban Cossack
13:47, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
Add any additional comments
The move itself is okay, however, I don't understand the choice of target -- per BGN/PCGN_romanization_of_Belarusian it would be Maladzyechna. Yury Tarasievich 13:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
I hereby close this vote as per WP:IAR because it is definetely clear that it won't fly. While ridding of Lacinka, thus bringing the article in accordance to WP:NC is a good idea, it should indeed by brought to WP:NC properly. A new survey is started below. -- Irpen 06:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was move to Maladzyechna. Joelito ( talk) 21:33, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Maładečna → Maladzyechna –- Irpen 06:01, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
Ok, I think we can happlily conclude this without waiting for 5 days and thereby end this painful and, possibly, last stage. I don't see the need to attract "foreigners" with no clue on the issue. Not that I mind their opinion but for them to understand the problem will take a lot of reading and we should try saving their time. As we have BE, PL, RU, UA users agreeing here, we should just request unprotection and move it. I will do that if no one objects.
As for Molodechno, if someone wants to make a case for that another move based on a common usage, that person would need to do the homework and produce the proof. I won't because I would not assume there is much statistics on this rather obscure for the rest of the world town to prove much English usage. However, this is a separate issue which possibly may not even come up.
So, please voice your objections to the move unrpotection request if there are any. -- Irpen 06:23, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
I see enough evidence for consensus. I am not afraid of "foreigners". I just see the issue is obvious and I don't want to waste their time in reading all this talk pages. I do not insist. Oh, and your accusations are tiresome and will not get responses as I warned you before. -- Irpen 21:11, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified 5 external links on Maladzyechna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Page moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Jerm ( talk) 15:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Maladziečna → Maladzyechna – no existing letter č in English Maximiljan ( talk) 15:39, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
|
|
The result of the debate was none
Maładečna →
Maladzechna – After the last four months of deadlock I would like to finally undue the original partisan move by
User:Monkbel per the consensus agreed in the discussion with Yuri above.
Kuban Cossack
13:47, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
Add any additional comments
The move itself is okay, however, I don't understand the choice of target -- per BGN/PCGN_romanization_of_Belarusian it would be Maladzyechna. Yury Tarasievich 13:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
I hereby close this vote as per WP:IAR because it is definetely clear that it won't fly. While ridding of Lacinka, thus bringing the article in accordance to WP:NC is a good idea, it should indeed by brought to WP:NC properly. A new survey is started below. -- Irpen 06:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was move to Maladzyechna. Joelito ( talk) 21:33, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Maładečna → Maladzyechna –- Irpen 06:01, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
Ok, I think we can happlily conclude this without waiting for 5 days and thereby end this painful and, possibly, last stage. I don't see the need to attract "foreigners" with no clue on the issue. Not that I mind their opinion but for them to understand the problem will take a lot of reading and we should try saving their time. As we have BE, PL, RU, UA users agreeing here, we should just request unprotection and move it. I will do that if no one objects.
As for Molodechno, if someone wants to make a case for that another move based on a common usage, that person would need to do the homework and produce the proof. I won't because I would not assume there is much statistics on this rather obscure for the rest of the world town to prove much English usage. However, this is a separate issue which possibly may not even come up.
So, please voice your objections to the move unrpotection request if there are any. -- Irpen 06:23, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
I see enough evidence for consensus. I am not afraid of "foreigners". I just see the issue is obvious and I don't want to waste their time in reading all this talk pages. I do not insist. Oh, and your accusations are tiresome and will not get responses as I warned you before. -- Irpen 21:11, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified 5 external links on Maladzyechna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Page moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Jerm ( talk) 15:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Maladziečna → Maladzyechna – no existing letter č in English Maximiljan ( talk) 15:39, 27 February 2020 (UTC)