This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all
disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Weak oppose its quite generic and by long-term significance things like the roads may be more important for "M23" alone. When I Google M23 few of the results (ignoring News results) are for the movement, many are for the motorway but that's probably due to my location. Crouch, Swale (
talk)
20:27, 20 December 2023 (UTC)reply
https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=M23 indicates there were 237 views of M23 in October '23, and this allowed us to identify 67 outgoing clickstreams to the proposed primary topic, and for some reason we also have two apparent
WP:PTM's about a rebellion and an offensive that got 12 and 11 more. If we were generous and assumed that this was never the same reader, and that all of the people looking for the latter two topics would have gone through the main page for that topic, that's still just 90 clickstreams, which is just 38% of total incoming traffic. That's not really close to the standard described in
WP:PTOPIC. You'd have to make a more coherent argument why the average English reader would associate this term with this topic so strongly that it's worth risking making navigation worse for the other 62% of readers who might not have been looking for that. (Oppose) --
Joy (
talk)
11:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Oppose not the primary topic.
[1][2]; in both Google Scholar and Google Books, March 23 Movement does not appear to be the primary topic. -- 05:45, 22 December 2023 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
65.92.247.66 (
talk)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all
disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Weak oppose its quite generic and by long-term significance things like the roads may be more important for "M23" alone. When I Google M23 few of the results (ignoring News results) are for the movement, many are for the motorway but that's probably due to my location. Crouch, Swale (
talk)
20:27, 20 December 2023 (UTC)reply
https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=M23 indicates there were 237 views of M23 in October '23, and this allowed us to identify 67 outgoing clickstreams to the proposed primary topic, and for some reason we also have two apparent
WP:PTM's about a rebellion and an offensive that got 12 and 11 more. If we were generous and assumed that this was never the same reader, and that all of the people looking for the latter two topics would have gone through the main page for that topic, that's still just 90 clickstreams, which is just 38% of total incoming traffic. That's not really close to the standard described in
WP:PTOPIC. You'd have to make a more coherent argument why the average English reader would associate this term with this topic so strongly that it's worth risking making navigation worse for the other 62% of readers who might not have been looking for that. (Oppose) --
Joy (
talk)
11:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Oppose not the primary topic.
[1][2]; in both Google Scholar and Google Books, March 23 Movement does not appear to be the primary topic. -- 05:45, 22 December 2023 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
65.92.247.66 (
talk)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.