![]() | Ludlow Castle has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: December 29, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ludlow Castle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
It Is a great place with wonderful scenery.It has fantastic views that strectch pasted Ludlow itself. GO AND VISIT IT NOW!!!
I'm looking to do some further work to expand this article over the coming months. Before starting though, I'd like to propose a change to the citation style. The current style uses long references, e.g. "Coplestone-Crow "The End of the Anarchy to the de Genevilles" Ludlow Castle pp. 35–36". I wish to propose using the harnvb template short citation system throughout, backed up by the "cite web" template as appropriate; the previous example would appear as "Coplestone-Crow 2000, pp. 35-36" under this approach, for example, linked to the relevant item in the bibliography. I personally think that short citations for articles with lots of citations, particularly from edited volumes, are easier to read and to edit. Such a change requires prior consensus on this talk page, as per MOS:CITE, of course ( Nev, just to alert you in particular, as your considerable expansion of the article in 2012 established the current style!).
NB: if the consensus was to stay with the current style, I would look to carry out the expansion work anyway, using the current citation style. Hchc2009 ( talk) 06:08, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
...I've gone through and expanded the article a bit, and added maps etc. It will need a decent copyedit etc. I suspect. Hchc2009 ( talk) 11:20, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Zawed ( talk · contribs) 00:50, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
I'll take this one. Review to follow, it will probably take a few days given the length of the article. Cheers.
Zawed (
talk)
00:50, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Lead
11th century
12th century
13th century
Other stuff
Still have to do from 15th century onwards. Zawed ( talk) 08:08, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Continuing review:
15th century
16th century
17th century
18th century
19th century
20th century
Inner bailey
References
OK, all done here. Will check back in a few days for your responses. Cheers. Zawed ( talk) 03:33, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ludlow Castle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() | Ludlow Castle has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: December 29, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ludlow Castle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
It Is a great place with wonderful scenery.It has fantastic views that strectch pasted Ludlow itself. GO AND VISIT IT NOW!!!
I'm looking to do some further work to expand this article over the coming months. Before starting though, I'd like to propose a change to the citation style. The current style uses long references, e.g. "Coplestone-Crow "The End of the Anarchy to the de Genevilles" Ludlow Castle pp. 35–36". I wish to propose using the harnvb template short citation system throughout, backed up by the "cite web" template as appropriate; the previous example would appear as "Coplestone-Crow 2000, pp. 35-36" under this approach, for example, linked to the relevant item in the bibliography. I personally think that short citations for articles with lots of citations, particularly from edited volumes, are easier to read and to edit. Such a change requires prior consensus on this talk page, as per MOS:CITE, of course ( Nev, just to alert you in particular, as your considerable expansion of the article in 2012 established the current style!).
NB: if the consensus was to stay with the current style, I would look to carry out the expansion work anyway, using the current citation style. Hchc2009 ( talk) 06:08, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
...I've gone through and expanded the article a bit, and added maps etc. It will need a decent copyedit etc. I suspect. Hchc2009 ( talk) 11:20, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Zawed ( talk · contribs) 00:50, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
I'll take this one. Review to follow, it will probably take a few days given the length of the article. Cheers.
Zawed (
talk)
00:50, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Lead
11th century
12th century
13th century
Other stuff
Still have to do from 15th century onwards. Zawed ( talk) 08:08, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Continuing review:
15th century
16th century
17th century
18th century
19th century
20th century
Inner bailey
References
OK, all done here. Will check back in a few days for your responses. Cheers. Zawed ( talk) 03:33, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ludlow Castle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)