From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why 5.88%? Why not 6%? I don't imagine it can be measured so precisely anyway. Biscuittin ( talk) 15:35, 23 October 2008 (UTC) reply

I believe the 5.88% target was calculated by using a year-on-year reduction in line to meet the UK government's then target of 60% reduction in greenhouse gases by 2050. The 5.88% figure represented three of those years. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.85.195.28 ( talk) 15:04, 13 July 2009 (UTC) reply


Would a link to Low Carbon Communities' Website be useful? Ditto to [Marches Energy Agency], the charity which it's a member of? Progressity ( talk) 14:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why 5.88%? Why not 6%? I don't imagine it can be measured so precisely anyway. Biscuittin ( talk) 15:35, 23 October 2008 (UTC) reply

I believe the 5.88% target was calculated by using a year-on-year reduction in line to meet the UK government's then target of 60% reduction in greenhouse gases by 2050. The 5.88% figure represented three of those years. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.85.195.28 ( talk) 15:04, 13 July 2009 (UTC) reply


Would a link to Low Carbon Communities' Website be useful? Ditto to [Marches Energy Agency], the charity which it's a member of? Progressity ( talk) 14:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook