The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I don't see any place where it's talking about the presidency in general as opposed to specific presidencies. Linked Congress in the lead and the body.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk)
16:05, 18 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Earwig gives a 6.5% chance of copyright violation, which is extremely low.
All accessible sources seem live.
The sources seem extensive and generally comprehensive. However, there are a few biographies, that are listed in Further reading, that have not been cited. For example, Heffron's Louisa Catherine: The Other Mrs. Adams (which is edited by David F. Michelmore) seems to provide some insights that are not in the sources used. It seems to be available in Google books if you would like to look at an online version.
My workflow with these articles has been to include one or two full length biographies before nominating for GA, then going back and checking other biographies if and when I nominate for FA to meet its comprehensiveness requirement.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk)
16:05, 18 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The links to the Smithsonian are the portraits themselves. Is there a listing of the collections that can be used?
None that I'm aware of, though I'm not terribly familiar with sourcing art provenance or collections. This is something I left in from before I started editing the article.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk)
16:05, 18 August 2023 (UTC)reply
I'm only able to access a portion of the first one and neither of the other two. Though I don't see why the Smithsonian website isn't a reliable source for what's owned by the Smithsonian.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk)
01:15, 20 August 2023 (UTC)reply
It's not a hill I am prepared to die on.
WP:PRIMARY allows for reputably published primary sources.
The references to the rankings by Kelly, 2008, and Levy, 2014, lack the authors' names and page numbers.
To my knowledge, these were created and published by the institute as a whole and that's just contact information for the institute's director at the given time.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk)
16:05, 18 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I don't see any place where it's talking about the presidency in general as opposed to specific presidencies. Linked Congress in the lead and the body.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk)
16:05, 18 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Earwig gives a 6.5% chance of copyright violation, which is extremely low.
All accessible sources seem live.
The sources seem extensive and generally comprehensive. However, there are a few biographies, that are listed in Further reading, that have not been cited. For example, Heffron's Louisa Catherine: The Other Mrs. Adams (which is edited by David F. Michelmore) seems to provide some insights that are not in the sources used. It seems to be available in Google books if you would like to look at an online version.
My workflow with these articles has been to include one or two full length biographies before nominating for GA, then going back and checking other biographies if and when I nominate for FA to meet its comprehensiveness requirement.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk)
16:05, 18 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The links to the Smithsonian are the portraits themselves. Is there a listing of the collections that can be used?
None that I'm aware of, though I'm not terribly familiar with sourcing art provenance or collections. This is something I left in from before I started editing the article.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk)
16:05, 18 August 2023 (UTC)reply
I'm only able to access a portion of the first one and neither of the other two. Though I don't see why the Smithsonian website isn't a reliable source for what's owned by the Smithsonian.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk)
01:15, 20 August 2023 (UTC)reply
It's not a hill I am prepared to die on.
WP:PRIMARY allows for reputably published primary sources.
The references to the rankings by Kelly, 2008, and Levy, 2014, lack the authors' names and page numbers.
To my knowledge, these were created and published by the institute as a whole and that's just contact information for the institute's director at the given time.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk)
16:05, 18 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.