This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
The topic is valuable, but the loop and a half is not a recognized term of art. Knuth doesn't use these words. McConnell doesn't use these words. Astrachan does, but does not claim it as a definition. The topic is worth a mention in a structured programming class or in While loop, an article worthy of improvement. A loop and a half is merely an incarnation of a while loop with exit in the middle. The term doesn't even appear in the Free online dictionary of computing. One mention does not make a new definition. Rhadow ( talk) 09:39, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Rhadow, your breed of "editors" is why I always dearly regret trying to contribute to Wikipedia. I am deleting the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BarbarianAtTheGates ( talk • contribs) 12:07, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
The topic is valuable, but the loop and a half is not a recognized term of art. Knuth doesn't use these words. McConnell doesn't use these words. Astrachan does, but does not claim it as a definition. The topic is worth a mention in a structured programming class or in While loop, an article worthy of improvement. A loop and a half is merely an incarnation of a while loop with exit in the middle. The term doesn't even appear in the Free online dictionary of computing. One mention does not make a new definition. Rhadow ( talk) 09:39, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Rhadow, your breed of "editors" is why I always dearly regret trying to contribute to Wikipedia. I am deleting the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BarbarianAtTheGates ( talk • contribs) 12:07, 6 December 2018 (UTC)