![]() | A fact from Lockheed NF-104A appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 1 November 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is intended that this article be edited using American English grammar and spellings (even though I am English!!) as per WP:MOS and WP:AIR.
The article needs a three view drawing of the type if anyone has a 'free' one. many thanks Nimbus227 19:03, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, will wait a bit till everyone else has had a chance to correct things. I did think this type was worth an article of its own. The fourth airframe info is interesting, I did have something on that but chose not to put it in but it is better with it, hope editing this is taking your mind off of other matters. Cheers Nimbus227 19:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
On the page about Rocketplane_XP it says "The XP is seeking challenges Lockheed did not attempt with the NF-104" and NF-104 is a link to the page 'NF-104' which is a redirect to the page 'F-104 Starfighter'.
I have changed the NF-104 to be a link to the page 'Lockheed NF-104A' (this article) which I think is what is meant.
If that is correct then I think that page 'NF-104' s/b removed. However I am new around here and I don't want to be too bold and also I don't know how to edit redirect pages.
FerdinandFrog ( talk) 16:39, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
This article states: "It was realized that normal aircraft control surfaces had little or no effect in the thin atmosphere of the stratosphere..." Many aircraft (civilian airliners for example) operate quite nicely in the lower stratosphere with "normal aircraft control surfaces" so perhaps someone might wish to revise this statement to read "upper stratosphere."
![]() | A fact from Lockheed NF-104A appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 1 November 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is intended that this article be edited using American English grammar and spellings (even though I am English!!) as per WP:MOS and WP:AIR.
The article needs a three view drawing of the type if anyone has a 'free' one. many thanks Nimbus227 19:03, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, will wait a bit till everyone else has had a chance to correct things. I did think this type was worth an article of its own. The fourth airframe info is interesting, I did have something on that but chose not to put it in but it is better with it, hope editing this is taking your mind off of other matters. Cheers Nimbus227 19:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
On the page about Rocketplane_XP it says "The XP is seeking challenges Lockheed did not attempt with the NF-104" and NF-104 is a link to the page 'NF-104' which is a redirect to the page 'F-104 Starfighter'.
I have changed the NF-104 to be a link to the page 'Lockheed NF-104A' (this article) which I think is what is meant.
If that is correct then I think that page 'NF-104' s/b removed. However I am new around here and I don't want to be too bold and also I don't know how to edit redirect pages.
FerdinandFrog ( talk) 16:39, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
This article states: "It was realized that normal aircraft control surfaces had little or no effect in the thin atmosphere of the stratosphere..." Many aircraft (civilian airliners for example) operate quite nicely in the lower stratosphere with "normal aircraft control surfaces" so perhaps someone might wish to revise this statement to read "upper stratosphere."