![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Whoever wrote this needs to rewrite it before it gets put back in. It looked absolutely horrible, with bad numbering, bad formatting, formatting language just strewn out all over the place, and no understanding of the word 'death zone', which was twenty times the 'guesstimate' that the author wrote down. It was a bad thing to have on the page, unless someone does it right. So if you want to take the time to put it back, look up the building you're looking for, add its height in meters to the height (above sea level) of the land on which it was built. THEN, if it's above 8000 meters, put it down! OGatsby ( talk) 01:00, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
I am currently working on a combined list of tallest buildings, to replace the one currently in the article, which will include all three CTBUH height criteria in a sortable table. I'll probably limit it to 200 entries because it is difficult enough to do that many, what with all the checking against other Wikipedia articles, and multiple other sources. My primary reference will be these lists.
Comments, ideas, objections would be welcome. Astronaut ( talk) 22:50, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Really dont want to start an argument but I think it looks much better, however would support u in putting different ranks, but might be hard. Guyb123321 ( talk) 20:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
It doesn't fit into any of the categories since it isn't under construction, on hold, or built. It's just 'approved', but it's the tallest planned building in the world at ~1000m. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OGatsby ( talk • contribs) 02:32, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Istanbulsapphiretower.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 05:29, 12 January 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Hanoi Keangnam Landmark Tower August 2011.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 18:34, 17 January 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Abraj al Bait.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 20:42, 9 February 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Ryugyeong Hotel in Pyeongyang, North Korea on 12th October 2011.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 00:08, 10 February 2012 (UTC) |
Are there really two of these (131 and 179 in the current list)? According to this page
-- JohnBlackburne words deeds 20:02, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
U/C - Diamond Tower CD is 2014 Guyb123321 ( talk) 10:38, 19 February 2012 (UTC) Princess Tower 414 m (1,358 ft) 414 m (1,358 ft) 101 2012 UAE Dubai - Now Completed Guyb123321 ( talk) 10:36, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
The Map is a useful feature I admit but it needs updating and I dont mean to make it a top 250 map, I mean just top 200, I posted some stuff that needs doing ages ago and it never got done, so if no one is going to do it I think we will have to delete the map. Guyb123321 ( talk) 07:07, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Just found this http://skyscrapercenter.com/create.php?search=yes&status_COM=on&type_building=on site from the CTBUH that could help with editing this page, tell me what you think Guyb123321 ( talk) 21:31, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
As promised, I have been working on a new list based on data available from the CTBUH tall building database. So far, I have mocked up some example rows on this page: User:Astronaut/Sandbox1. Don't worry about the ranking of equal height buildings or the lack of country/city linking, that is something I'll fix up later, and the final list will run to 250 entries.
Comments are welcome, here or at the bottom of the sandbox page. I'm a little worried it could be too wide or with too many columns - for example, would it be better without the "building function" and "floor area" columns? Astronaut ( talk) 01:57, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU, the list looks really good and am really glad it is going to run to 250 entries :-), A few thoughts though,
Cool sounds good, thanks again for keeping the list at 250 entries, also do you think that the "under construction" and "on hold" tabs should be changed in any way??? Guyb123321 ( talk) 12:48, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
The list as it stands shows 40 Wall Street and The Trump Building in a tie for 100th place. However, their links go to the same article, which explains that "The Trump Building" is the present official name for the building better known as 40 Wall Street. That is, the two names refer to a single building. I would merge the entries on the table, but it would be a lot of work to manually renumber everything lower, and (more importantly) the vital statistics listed in the entries don't match. How can this be resolved? 99.157.206.199 ( talk) 04:58, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
This is getting heated and a bit ridiculous. I've raised the issue on Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard and requested protection. Unfortunately User talk:114.229.251.187 does not appear to want to talk in any way other than the edit summary as he reverts. Der yck C. 21:56, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Hong Kong is NOT a country by itself, the category in this article specifically states country, so any buildings in Hong Kong should be labeled under their parent country of China or Hong Kong, China. Please read the article about Hong Kong so that you know that it is a Special Administrative Region of China and not a country by itself. Thanks! 114.229.251.187 ( talk) 22:14, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Administrator note I have blocked
114.229.251.187 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
filter log ·
WHOIS ·
RDNS ·
RBLs ·
http ·
block user ·
block log) 48 hours for edit warring related to this dispute.
Ks0stm (
T•
C•
G•
E)
22:39, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Doing a semi-protect rather than a full-protect on the article should do the trick. OhanaUnited Talk page 15:22, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
I agree with the above editor, Hong Kong is not a country by any means. The country should be listed as China in the article. 117.90.75.14 ( talk) 11:06, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
I'm in favor of keeping Hong Kong as just "Hong Kong," with the ", China". I don't know if this is going to help, but these are the reasons why:
I'm not sure if that will make much of a difference to the "Hong Kong, China" crowd, but if you guys could respond to these reasons one-by-one as to why I'm wrong, then I'd be happy to support "Hong Kong, China." Until then, consider me on the side of just "Hong Kong." -- Nick2253 ( talk) 20:10, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
It is true that Hong Kong is just a city of China, so I'm in favor of changing the country listing to China, by changing we would be simply following the same format as all the other countries listed on this article. Such United States and others. 222.186.101.77 ( talk) 23:28, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
This is a Wikipedia page. And therefore, we should use Wikipedia as a source of information. This is not a page on Honk Kong, but a page on buildings. It is true that a country is different from a sovereign state. But list of countries redirects to list of sovereign states, and HK is not there. If you want to disagree with that, please discuss on the proper pages, not this one. Whether John Blackburne is right or not about the English language (I have been in the UK for more than a decade and never heard about Hong Kong as a "country" by the way. Including by students from HK), replacing China by Hong Kong here is vandalism. Nicolas Le Novere ( talk) 14:51, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
The list of the worlds tallest buildings is being vandalized making this article both untrustworthy and incomplete. For a start has Taipei 101 suddenly being demolished or something?
Unusable information! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.27.228.178 ( talk) 04:24, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
http://wikimapia.org/3849246/Russia-Tower-Construction-Site
what does this look to you???-- Shokioto22 ( talk) 18:56, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Hey Astronaut, just wondering when you will upload the new list as thinking about making a few changes but dont want to know with this old list, thanks, GuyB Guyb123321 ( talk) 13:54, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Sorry for bothering you again Astronaut, just wondering when roughly the new list will be up, Guyb123321 ( talk) 11:53, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the skytower in Auckland New Zealand to the list.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sky_Tower
116.199.213.66 ( talk) 04:51, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Shouldn't the Pearl River Tower make the "Height to roof" list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.187.97.19 ( talk) 13:41, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
As of a couple of weeks ago, the new WTC building took the top spot away from the ESB. 84.155.183.125 ( talk) 22:03, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
its pretty much done
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SkVrIaQy6Y http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cOsbvXnqfc -- Shokioto22 ( talk) 21:18, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
The U/C section is a mess. The world as of 2012, according to CTBUH, has about 170 +250m buildings and China alone has 89 +250m buildings U/C. So if I add everything the list will be too long. I propose to rise the cutoff to some where between 300m or 350m then if I add everything there will be about 94 or 35 buildings to put on the list respectively. Steve chiu ( talk) 02:00, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Pearl of the Pacific is proposed and it don't exists. I should remove this content.
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearl of the Pacific
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lee, Eungki C. ( talk • contribs) 12:13, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
If it is not finished why do you include it in the list? Please check this 100 tallest list does not include it yet. The list is misleading. 130.206.68.4 ( talk) 10:26, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Why the Eiffel Tower has been omitted of these lists ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThomasSpectre ( talk • contribs) 12:37, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
I think we have (you have, because the page is locked) to include some important buildings, at least those which have been the tallest buildings in the world (such as Eiffel Tower or the Great Pyramid of Giza which has been during thousand years the tallest building in the world). Considering just XX and XXI century buildings is absurd! -- AlexanderFreud ( talk) 10:02, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
I do not see the shard in the list of the tallest skyscrapers in the world, and it should be added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.240.233.161 ( talk) 22:09, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Under the remarks of One World Trade Center in the Under Construction section it says it will become the third tallest in the U.S.A when in fact it will be the tallest in the U.S.A., whoever put that is not counting the spire. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Informed Person ( talk • contribs) 01:35, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, as per this title can we make sure when we update the buildings in the list we also update the numbers preferably at the same time, because just going through the list, all buildings after 122 need to go up 1 because someone didn't update the numbers after deleting the trump tower toronot, the 4 buildings on 149 actually should have been on 148(so they are know on 147 as all buildings after 122 have gone up 1), and all buildings after 243 had to go up by 2 because of another editor not updating the numbers, so if we could all update the numbering as soon as we update the list, that would be great thanks. Guyb123321 ( talk) 22:42, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
This page needs a picture of the tallest building in the world! Immediately. Gabriel arisi ( talk) 03:48, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Burj_Khalifa_building.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabriel arisi ( talk • contribs) 03:47, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakhta_Center
ad Lakhta Center to under contraction list its 463m tall.
http://gulfnews.com/business/construction/arabtec-to-build-europe-s-tallest-office-tower-1.1083493 http://www.thenational.ae/thenationalconversation/industry-insights/property/arabtec-wins-contract-to-build-gazprom-headquarters-in-russia -- Shokioto22 ( talk) 03:37, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/9648603/Moscow-reclaims-Europes-tallest-building-title-from-Londons-Shard.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guyb123321 ( talk • contribs) 15:45, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
according to CTBUH we are stil missing quite a few buildings in the completed list.
http://skyscrapercenter.com/create.php?search=yes&status_COM=on&type_building=on
Steve chiu ( talk) 22:10, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Sri-Lanka Colombo Lotus Tower-350 meters.
Krrish Square Tower 1-95 floors
Krrish Square tower 2-91 floors
Krrish Square Tower 3-65 Floors
Krrish Square Tower 4-65 Floors
Altair Building-65 Floors — Preceding unsigned comment added by Popthepuff ( talk • contribs) 11:38, 22 December 2012
Sources for all 3 projects were listed on this page : [ [5]]. I believe that the website may be a little outdated, given that it lists the Diamond Tower which is a formerly U/C project now on hold as a vision. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Popthepuff ( talk • contribs) 07:44, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Project was cancelled. Should be removed from "on hold" list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Popthepuff ( talk • contribs) 11:41, 22 December 2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milad_Tower
East Pacific Business Center & Grand International Mansion have now finished (they actually finished back in 2012) Guyb123321 ( talk) 20:04, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Based on this information as well as this video from Century Properties (developer of the building, the Gramercy Residences is only 250m tall and not 302m, hence it is not the tallest building in the Philippines and will move down the list to at least no. 228. Can someone please rectify the list to include such changes? GrayFullbuster ( talk) 01:30, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hi you don't have to allow me to edit if you don't want, but the second tallest building in the world is currently the Tokyo Skytree in Japan standing at 634 meters, and is a radio/tv/broadcasting tower. Peace out. Bluemagick808 ( talk) 06:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Tokyo Sky Tree is the tallest free standing structure in the world, its not the tallest building in the world, and also it doesn't meet the criteria of the tallest building / skyscraper.
Nabil rais2008 ( talk) 17:01, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
The Damac Heights, a supertall skyscraper under construction in Dubai Marina, Dubai, has now been replaced by a new shorter building with a height of 335 metres tall, i saw this, when i tried to open the database of Damac Heights on CTBUH, but that was either deleted or moved:here Damac Heights , and the new page has been created by the name of Damach Residenze, here DAMAC Residenze.
But i am unable to find any other reliable source that says the tower's height has been reduced, if any one of you have such source then please share here, as we have to change the rank of tower in this article.
Nabil rais2008 ( talk) 12:21, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
We do not count antennas, yet on 1WTC it's counted. Elk Salmon ( talk) 13:46, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
The Stratosphere Las Vegas is missing. -- XXLVenom999 ( talk) 20:01, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
In the list, the second tallest building is entered as something in Shanghai with a completion date of 2014. I can provide almost seven witnesses to testify that this year hasnt showed up yet... The biggest and second tallest land structure ever built is the Makkah Royal Hotel Clock Tower cluster. Thus it should be second on the list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.187.251.113 ( talk) 16:02, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
When I clicked to sort by height in metres, it sorted the values alphanumerically!! It starts at 1001, 1002 .... 2073, 2717, 790 .... 995, 997 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Byron3 60 ( talk • contribs) 15:32, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Marcos: Central America is not considered a continent, by any of the common definitions, rather it is considered a subcontinent, though I note that our article does not actually list the various subcontinents. Is it possible that because Latin Americans are taught that "America" is one continent, the division of "America" into North, Central, and South American seems no odder than the division into only North and South America? Certainly to English speakers, the idea of Central America as a continent seems rather odd.
Regardless, I don't really care, since I personally think that treating "Europe" and "Asia" as two continents is pretty silly, however I would ask that you move it after Australia, as Central America is geographically smaller than Oz even if you include Chiapas, Tabasco, and the Yucatan. — Quintucket ( talk) 21:10, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
There is no mention of the tallest building in Oceania - Sky Tower in Auckland, New Zealand - which, at 328m, is 6m taller than the Gold Coast's Q1 Tower. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Motorhussy ( talk • contribs) 21:20, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Why isn't the floor area shown? this is a critical measure of how big a tall building actually is. The list for record floor area buildings is largely populated by flat strutctures or large buildings that are not very tall, so this would be a good place for that information to compare the "largest" skyscrapers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4C28:194:520:5E26:AFF:FEFE:8624 ( talk) 08:31, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Should the communication antenna on the One World Trade Center (OWTC) be considered a spire and therefore an architectural element, or should it be considered a pure antenna? This is a relevant question because antennas are not considered in measuring the height of a building for the purpose of this wiki article.
I am not sure that we should include the antenna/spire in the architectural height of OWTC, judging from these photos: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:OneWorldTradeCenter.jpg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:One_WTC_7.5.13.JPG
What do you think? Fire away please. DonitzLiebt ( talk)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Moshe Aviv tower is not located in Tel Aviv, but in Ramat Gan. 93.172.62.208 ( talk) 09:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Done - thanks for pointing that out
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The CN Tower in Toronto, Ontario is not listed on here at all, it is still very high up there on the list. Although in the Wiki Page for CN Tower it lists as tallest building in Western civilization. This list is inaccurate.
64.56.144.111 ( talk) 00:37, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Yeah I'm not good at editing Wikipedia, plus I have a whole bunch of other stuff going on, but the CN Tower needs to be on this list! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.52.201.39 ( talk) 01:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Not done - if you read the article, it clearly explains it is a list of the tallest buildings, not structures - the criteria is having continuous, occupiable, floors - on which basis, the CN tower is about 5 storeys high.
However, you will find the CN tower on
List of tallest structures in the world -
Arjayay (
talk)
11:07, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
(Moved from the middle of a section further up on a different topic)
CN Tower in toronto is well above 500 M. ?????? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
64.56.144.111 (
talk)
00:35, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Chicago Spire is a skyscraper that is currently on hold in Chicago, IL USA. It's final height will be 2000 feet, or 610 meters. 2601:D:D280:E23:FD77:D84E:B5A3:1DD5 ( talk) 10:14, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Done Added to "Skyscrapers on hold" list - although as work was suspended in 2008, I am not sure when we change "on-hold" to "abandoned" -
Arjayay (
talk)
11:31, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
It hasn't been topped out. So 14th should be Trump Tower and so on. Somebody can check this out? -- Doblecaña ( talk) 15:46, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
It's a list of the world's tallest buildings and the CN Tower isn't even mentioned, yet there are building half its size mentioned on the list? As a proud and fact loving Canadian I would like to see its facts up on this page. 99.235.25.160 ( talk) 15:23, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Not done - please read the explanations above -
Arjayay (
talk)
15:52, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Hong Kong is not a country but a city of China, so under "COUNTRY" you should write CHINA.-- 79.144.102.242 ( talk) 02:19, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
I am from SPAIN, and I have never been in China, but it is OBVIOUS that if you write "TALLEST BUILDINGS BY COUNTRY", then the word used has to be CHINA, not Hong Kong which is just a Chinese city as anybody knows. Whatever people say is not relevant as far as facts are taken into account. Hong Kong is right now a city of CHINA. That is out of discussion.--
88.1.244.26 (
talk)
17:51, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
You can solve the problem easily writing about the tallest buildings in the World just by CITY, not by country. Otherwise it is ridiculous, because then you would have to write NEW YORK....Country: NEW YORK. It is not a question of debate that Hong Kong is part of China as everybody knows it is, and as any serious Encyclopedia says.--
88.1.244.26 (
talk)
17:55, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
You should read an Encyclopedia to know where is Hong Kong...-- 193.152.161.116 ( talk) 04:43, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
But even you agree that there is no discussion about the COUNTRY: CHINA. That is out of discussion.-- 79.146.242.195 ( talk) 03:45, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
The appropriate solution is to change to column heading from "Country" to "Country/Region" (or "Country/Area") then, if editors on this page want to leave the HKG flag up. Because most of the posters to this thread are in fact correct - if the column heading is just "Country", then the flag must China's, by definition (i.e. List of sovereign nations). -- IJBall ( talk) 17:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
You are right, WP is not a dictionary, but that is meant primarily to exclude articles that consist only of definitions of words. WP is an encyclopaedia, with articles on topics, not words. But that does not make it less accurate. Parts of country concerns sovereign states but only parts as you note – that's not the only meaning. As for one country, two systems it's a direct translation of the chengyu 一国两制, a slogan devised by the communist leadership, so is both POV and loses a lot in translation and so certainly not a useful guide as to how to use words in English.-- JohnBlackburne words deeds 01:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The list items are misnumbered. There's four buildings with the rank 91, but they are followed by a #94. Same goes for the 229 ranks, there's three of those followed by a 231. Underyx ( talk) 21:21, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
{{
citation}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help). The specific request is that building order be renumbereItd so as to include natural numbers, excepting that where there is a tie the appropriate number of spaces in the natural ordering is skipped. Other places where there are numbering issues are at *current* positions 14, 94, 108 and 231.
Utunga (
talk)90, 91, 91, 91, 94 and 107, 108, 108, 110 and 229, 229, 231.
90, 91, 91, 91, 91, 94 and 107, 108, 108, 108, 110 and 229, 229, 229, 231.
Done, thanks
Underyx. Sorry
Cannolis, I was working on this before you posted! (Mind-numbing indeed.) Someone may want to double-check my work. Cheers,
Little
Mountain
5
19:50, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
There are still three buildings in the under construction list that said they finished last year, does anybody know anything about these three so as to add them to the main list or push back their completion date? Guyb123321 ( talk) 14:37, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
List of tallest buildings in the world has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
111.119.180.122 ( talk) 22:46, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Karachi Port Trust 117floors
Canton Tower was the world's highest building from 2009 August to 2011. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.18.25.231 ( talk) 11:45, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
since 7.10.2014!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please add it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.102.132.229 ( talk) 09:00, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
It is listed as 828 m in the "Height to roof" section. However, its own article's infobox has "Top floor" with "584.5 m". I thought they should be the same, or possibly height of the floor added to the figure. If it is indeed correct, I suggest "highest floor" list be added to the article. 82.141.73.182 ( talk) 01:16, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
List of tallest buildings in the world has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Could you please add the Warisan Merdeka to the U/C Section of the page. It is a minimum of 600M tall, with 188 floors, located in KL. Construction started this year and is due to be completed in 2019
L.A Regent ( talk) 19:11, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Done - but
Warisan Merdeka is only planned to have 118 floors, not 188, and the information seems slightly vague, so it may be removed or demoted. -
Arjayay (
talk)
07:57, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Whoever wrote this needs to rewrite it before it gets put back in. It looked absolutely horrible, with bad numbering, bad formatting, formatting language just strewn out all over the place, and no understanding of the word 'death zone', which was twenty times the 'guesstimate' that the author wrote down. It was a bad thing to have on the page, unless someone does it right. So if you want to take the time to put it back, look up the building you're looking for, add its height in meters to the height (above sea level) of the land on which it was built. THEN, if it's above 8000 meters, put it down! OGatsby ( talk) 01:00, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
I am currently working on a combined list of tallest buildings, to replace the one currently in the article, which will include all three CTBUH height criteria in a sortable table. I'll probably limit it to 200 entries because it is difficult enough to do that many, what with all the checking against other Wikipedia articles, and multiple other sources. My primary reference will be these lists.
Comments, ideas, objections would be welcome. Astronaut ( talk) 22:50, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Really dont want to start an argument but I think it looks much better, however would support u in putting different ranks, but might be hard. Guyb123321 ( talk) 20:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
It doesn't fit into any of the categories since it isn't under construction, on hold, or built. It's just 'approved', but it's the tallest planned building in the world at ~1000m. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OGatsby ( talk • contribs) 02:32, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Istanbulsapphiretower.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 05:29, 12 January 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Hanoi Keangnam Landmark Tower August 2011.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 18:34, 17 January 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Abraj al Bait.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 20:42, 9 February 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Ryugyeong Hotel in Pyeongyang, North Korea on 12th October 2011.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 00:08, 10 February 2012 (UTC) |
Are there really two of these (131 and 179 in the current list)? According to this page
-- JohnBlackburne words deeds 20:02, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
U/C - Diamond Tower CD is 2014 Guyb123321 ( talk) 10:38, 19 February 2012 (UTC) Princess Tower 414 m (1,358 ft) 414 m (1,358 ft) 101 2012 UAE Dubai - Now Completed Guyb123321 ( talk) 10:36, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
The Map is a useful feature I admit but it needs updating and I dont mean to make it a top 250 map, I mean just top 200, I posted some stuff that needs doing ages ago and it never got done, so if no one is going to do it I think we will have to delete the map. Guyb123321 ( talk) 07:07, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Just found this http://skyscrapercenter.com/create.php?search=yes&status_COM=on&type_building=on site from the CTBUH that could help with editing this page, tell me what you think Guyb123321 ( talk) 21:31, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
As promised, I have been working on a new list based on data available from the CTBUH tall building database. So far, I have mocked up some example rows on this page: User:Astronaut/Sandbox1. Don't worry about the ranking of equal height buildings or the lack of country/city linking, that is something I'll fix up later, and the final list will run to 250 entries.
Comments are welcome, here or at the bottom of the sandbox page. I'm a little worried it could be too wide or with too many columns - for example, would it be better without the "building function" and "floor area" columns? Astronaut ( talk) 01:57, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU, the list looks really good and am really glad it is going to run to 250 entries :-), A few thoughts though,
Cool sounds good, thanks again for keeping the list at 250 entries, also do you think that the "under construction" and "on hold" tabs should be changed in any way??? Guyb123321 ( talk) 12:48, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
The list as it stands shows 40 Wall Street and The Trump Building in a tie for 100th place. However, their links go to the same article, which explains that "The Trump Building" is the present official name for the building better known as 40 Wall Street. That is, the two names refer to a single building. I would merge the entries on the table, but it would be a lot of work to manually renumber everything lower, and (more importantly) the vital statistics listed in the entries don't match. How can this be resolved? 99.157.206.199 ( talk) 04:58, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
This is getting heated and a bit ridiculous. I've raised the issue on Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard and requested protection. Unfortunately User talk:114.229.251.187 does not appear to want to talk in any way other than the edit summary as he reverts. Der yck C. 21:56, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Hong Kong is NOT a country by itself, the category in this article specifically states country, so any buildings in Hong Kong should be labeled under their parent country of China or Hong Kong, China. Please read the article about Hong Kong so that you know that it is a Special Administrative Region of China and not a country by itself. Thanks! 114.229.251.187 ( talk) 22:14, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Administrator note I have blocked
114.229.251.187 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
filter log ·
WHOIS ·
RDNS ·
RBLs ·
http ·
block user ·
block log) 48 hours for edit warring related to this dispute.
Ks0stm (
T•
C•
G•
E)
22:39, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Doing a semi-protect rather than a full-protect on the article should do the trick. OhanaUnited Talk page 15:22, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
I agree with the above editor, Hong Kong is not a country by any means. The country should be listed as China in the article. 117.90.75.14 ( talk) 11:06, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
I'm in favor of keeping Hong Kong as just "Hong Kong," with the ", China". I don't know if this is going to help, but these are the reasons why:
I'm not sure if that will make much of a difference to the "Hong Kong, China" crowd, but if you guys could respond to these reasons one-by-one as to why I'm wrong, then I'd be happy to support "Hong Kong, China." Until then, consider me on the side of just "Hong Kong." -- Nick2253 ( talk) 20:10, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
It is true that Hong Kong is just a city of China, so I'm in favor of changing the country listing to China, by changing we would be simply following the same format as all the other countries listed on this article. Such United States and others. 222.186.101.77 ( talk) 23:28, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
This is a Wikipedia page. And therefore, we should use Wikipedia as a source of information. This is not a page on Honk Kong, but a page on buildings. It is true that a country is different from a sovereign state. But list of countries redirects to list of sovereign states, and HK is not there. If you want to disagree with that, please discuss on the proper pages, not this one. Whether John Blackburne is right or not about the English language (I have been in the UK for more than a decade and never heard about Hong Kong as a "country" by the way. Including by students from HK), replacing China by Hong Kong here is vandalism. Nicolas Le Novere ( talk) 14:51, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
The list of the worlds tallest buildings is being vandalized making this article both untrustworthy and incomplete. For a start has Taipei 101 suddenly being demolished or something?
Unusable information! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.27.228.178 ( talk) 04:24, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
http://wikimapia.org/3849246/Russia-Tower-Construction-Site
what does this look to you???-- Shokioto22 ( talk) 18:56, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Hey Astronaut, just wondering when you will upload the new list as thinking about making a few changes but dont want to know with this old list, thanks, GuyB Guyb123321 ( talk) 13:54, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Sorry for bothering you again Astronaut, just wondering when roughly the new list will be up, Guyb123321 ( talk) 11:53, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the skytower in Auckland New Zealand to the list.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sky_Tower
116.199.213.66 ( talk) 04:51, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Shouldn't the Pearl River Tower make the "Height to roof" list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.187.97.19 ( talk) 13:41, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
As of a couple of weeks ago, the new WTC building took the top spot away from the ESB. 84.155.183.125 ( talk) 22:03, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
its pretty much done
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SkVrIaQy6Y http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cOsbvXnqfc -- Shokioto22 ( talk) 21:18, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
The U/C section is a mess. The world as of 2012, according to CTBUH, has about 170 +250m buildings and China alone has 89 +250m buildings U/C. So if I add everything the list will be too long. I propose to rise the cutoff to some where between 300m or 350m then if I add everything there will be about 94 or 35 buildings to put on the list respectively. Steve chiu ( talk) 02:00, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Pearl of the Pacific is proposed and it don't exists. I should remove this content.
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearl of the Pacific
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lee, Eungki C. ( talk • contribs) 12:13, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
If it is not finished why do you include it in the list? Please check this 100 tallest list does not include it yet. The list is misleading. 130.206.68.4 ( talk) 10:26, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Why the Eiffel Tower has been omitted of these lists ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThomasSpectre ( talk • contribs) 12:37, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
I think we have (you have, because the page is locked) to include some important buildings, at least those which have been the tallest buildings in the world (such as Eiffel Tower or the Great Pyramid of Giza which has been during thousand years the tallest building in the world). Considering just XX and XXI century buildings is absurd! -- AlexanderFreud ( talk) 10:02, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
I do not see the shard in the list of the tallest skyscrapers in the world, and it should be added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.240.233.161 ( talk) 22:09, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Under the remarks of One World Trade Center in the Under Construction section it says it will become the third tallest in the U.S.A when in fact it will be the tallest in the U.S.A., whoever put that is not counting the spire. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Informed Person ( talk • contribs) 01:35, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, as per this title can we make sure when we update the buildings in the list we also update the numbers preferably at the same time, because just going through the list, all buildings after 122 need to go up 1 because someone didn't update the numbers after deleting the trump tower toronot, the 4 buildings on 149 actually should have been on 148(so they are know on 147 as all buildings after 122 have gone up 1), and all buildings after 243 had to go up by 2 because of another editor not updating the numbers, so if we could all update the numbering as soon as we update the list, that would be great thanks. Guyb123321 ( talk) 22:42, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
This page needs a picture of the tallest building in the world! Immediately. Gabriel arisi ( talk) 03:48, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Burj_Khalifa_building.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabriel arisi ( talk • contribs) 03:47, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakhta_Center
ad Lakhta Center to under contraction list its 463m tall.
http://gulfnews.com/business/construction/arabtec-to-build-europe-s-tallest-office-tower-1.1083493 http://www.thenational.ae/thenationalconversation/industry-insights/property/arabtec-wins-contract-to-build-gazprom-headquarters-in-russia -- Shokioto22 ( talk) 03:37, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/9648603/Moscow-reclaims-Europes-tallest-building-title-from-Londons-Shard.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guyb123321 ( talk • contribs) 15:45, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
according to CTBUH we are stil missing quite a few buildings in the completed list.
http://skyscrapercenter.com/create.php?search=yes&status_COM=on&type_building=on
Steve chiu ( talk) 22:10, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Sri-Lanka Colombo Lotus Tower-350 meters.
Krrish Square Tower 1-95 floors
Krrish Square tower 2-91 floors
Krrish Square Tower 3-65 Floors
Krrish Square Tower 4-65 Floors
Altair Building-65 Floors — Preceding unsigned comment added by Popthepuff ( talk • contribs) 11:38, 22 December 2012
Sources for all 3 projects were listed on this page : [ [5]]. I believe that the website may be a little outdated, given that it lists the Diamond Tower which is a formerly U/C project now on hold as a vision. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Popthepuff ( talk • contribs) 07:44, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Project was cancelled. Should be removed from "on hold" list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Popthepuff ( talk • contribs) 11:41, 22 December 2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milad_Tower
East Pacific Business Center & Grand International Mansion have now finished (they actually finished back in 2012) Guyb123321 ( talk) 20:04, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Based on this information as well as this video from Century Properties (developer of the building, the Gramercy Residences is only 250m tall and not 302m, hence it is not the tallest building in the Philippines and will move down the list to at least no. 228. Can someone please rectify the list to include such changes? GrayFullbuster ( talk) 01:30, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hi you don't have to allow me to edit if you don't want, but the second tallest building in the world is currently the Tokyo Skytree in Japan standing at 634 meters, and is a radio/tv/broadcasting tower. Peace out. Bluemagick808 ( talk) 06:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Tokyo Sky Tree is the tallest free standing structure in the world, its not the tallest building in the world, and also it doesn't meet the criteria of the tallest building / skyscraper.
Nabil rais2008 ( talk) 17:01, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
The Damac Heights, a supertall skyscraper under construction in Dubai Marina, Dubai, has now been replaced by a new shorter building with a height of 335 metres tall, i saw this, when i tried to open the database of Damac Heights on CTBUH, but that was either deleted or moved:here Damac Heights , and the new page has been created by the name of Damach Residenze, here DAMAC Residenze.
But i am unable to find any other reliable source that says the tower's height has been reduced, if any one of you have such source then please share here, as we have to change the rank of tower in this article.
Nabil rais2008 ( talk) 12:21, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
We do not count antennas, yet on 1WTC it's counted. Elk Salmon ( talk) 13:46, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
The Stratosphere Las Vegas is missing. -- XXLVenom999 ( talk) 20:01, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
In the list, the second tallest building is entered as something in Shanghai with a completion date of 2014. I can provide almost seven witnesses to testify that this year hasnt showed up yet... The biggest and second tallest land structure ever built is the Makkah Royal Hotel Clock Tower cluster. Thus it should be second on the list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.187.251.113 ( talk) 16:02, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
When I clicked to sort by height in metres, it sorted the values alphanumerically!! It starts at 1001, 1002 .... 2073, 2717, 790 .... 995, 997 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Byron3 60 ( talk • contribs) 15:32, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Marcos: Central America is not considered a continent, by any of the common definitions, rather it is considered a subcontinent, though I note that our article does not actually list the various subcontinents. Is it possible that because Latin Americans are taught that "America" is one continent, the division of "America" into North, Central, and South American seems no odder than the division into only North and South America? Certainly to English speakers, the idea of Central America as a continent seems rather odd.
Regardless, I don't really care, since I personally think that treating "Europe" and "Asia" as two continents is pretty silly, however I would ask that you move it after Australia, as Central America is geographically smaller than Oz even if you include Chiapas, Tabasco, and the Yucatan. — Quintucket ( talk) 21:10, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
There is no mention of the tallest building in Oceania - Sky Tower in Auckland, New Zealand - which, at 328m, is 6m taller than the Gold Coast's Q1 Tower. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Motorhussy ( talk • contribs) 21:20, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Why isn't the floor area shown? this is a critical measure of how big a tall building actually is. The list for record floor area buildings is largely populated by flat strutctures or large buildings that are not very tall, so this would be a good place for that information to compare the "largest" skyscrapers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4C28:194:520:5E26:AFF:FEFE:8624 ( talk) 08:31, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Should the communication antenna on the One World Trade Center (OWTC) be considered a spire and therefore an architectural element, or should it be considered a pure antenna? This is a relevant question because antennas are not considered in measuring the height of a building for the purpose of this wiki article.
I am not sure that we should include the antenna/spire in the architectural height of OWTC, judging from these photos: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:OneWorldTradeCenter.jpg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:One_WTC_7.5.13.JPG
What do you think? Fire away please. DonitzLiebt ( talk)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Moshe Aviv tower is not located in Tel Aviv, but in Ramat Gan. 93.172.62.208 ( talk) 09:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Done - thanks for pointing that out
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The CN Tower in Toronto, Ontario is not listed on here at all, it is still very high up there on the list. Although in the Wiki Page for CN Tower it lists as tallest building in Western civilization. This list is inaccurate.
64.56.144.111 ( talk) 00:37, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Yeah I'm not good at editing Wikipedia, plus I have a whole bunch of other stuff going on, but the CN Tower needs to be on this list! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.52.201.39 ( talk) 01:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Not done - if you read the article, it clearly explains it is a list of the tallest buildings, not structures - the criteria is having continuous, occupiable, floors - on which basis, the CN tower is about 5 storeys high.
However, you will find the CN tower on
List of tallest structures in the world -
Arjayay (
talk)
11:07, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
(Moved from the middle of a section further up on a different topic)
CN Tower in toronto is well above 500 M. ?????? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
64.56.144.111 (
talk)
00:35, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Chicago Spire is a skyscraper that is currently on hold in Chicago, IL USA. It's final height will be 2000 feet, or 610 meters. 2601:D:D280:E23:FD77:D84E:B5A3:1DD5 ( talk) 10:14, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Done Added to "Skyscrapers on hold" list - although as work was suspended in 2008, I am not sure when we change "on-hold" to "abandoned" -
Arjayay (
talk)
11:31, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
It hasn't been topped out. So 14th should be Trump Tower and so on. Somebody can check this out? -- Doblecaña ( talk) 15:46, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
It's a list of the world's tallest buildings and the CN Tower isn't even mentioned, yet there are building half its size mentioned on the list? As a proud and fact loving Canadian I would like to see its facts up on this page. 99.235.25.160 ( talk) 15:23, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Not done - please read the explanations above -
Arjayay (
talk)
15:52, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Hong Kong is not a country but a city of China, so under "COUNTRY" you should write CHINA.-- 79.144.102.242 ( talk) 02:19, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
I am from SPAIN, and I have never been in China, but it is OBVIOUS that if you write "TALLEST BUILDINGS BY COUNTRY", then the word used has to be CHINA, not Hong Kong which is just a Chinese city as anybody knows. Whatever people say is not relevant as far as facts are taken into account. Hong Kong is right now a city of CHINA. That is out of discussion.--
88.1.244.26 (
talk)
17:51, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
You can solve the problem easily writing about the tallest buildings in the World just by CITY, not by country. Otherwise it is ridiculous, because then you would have to write NEW YORK....Country: NEW YORK. It is not a question of debate that Hong Kong is part of China as everybody knows it is, and as any serious Encyclopedia says.--
88.1.244.26 (
talk)
17:55, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
You should read an Encyclopedia to know where is Hong Kong...-- 193.152.161.116 ( talk) 04:43, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
But even you agree that there is no discussion about the COUNTRY: CHINA. That is out of discussion.-- 79.146.242.195 ( talk) 03:45, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
The appropriate solution is to change to column heading from "Country" to "Country/Region" (or "Country/Area") then, if editors on this page want to leave the HKG flag up. Because most of the posters to this thread are in fact correct - if the column heading is just "Country", then the flag must China's, by definition (i.e. List of sovereign nations). -- IJBall ( talk) 17:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
You are right, WP is not a dictionary, but that is meant primarily to exclude articles that consist only of definitions of words. WP is an encyclopaedia, with articles on topics, not words. But that does not make it less accurate. Parts of country concerns sovereign states but only parts as you note – that's not the only meaning. As for one country, two systems it's a direct translation of the chengyu 一国两制, a slogan devised by the communist leadership, so is both POV and loses a lot in translation and so certainly not a useful guide as to how to use words in English.-- JohnBlackburne words deeds 01:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The list items are misnumbered. There's four buildings with the rank 91, but they are followed by a #94. Same goes for the 229 ranks, there's three of those followed by a 231. Underyx ( talk) 21:21, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
{{
citation}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help). The specific request is that building order be renumbereItd so as to include natural numbers, excepting that where there is a tie the appropriate number of spaces in the natural ordering is skipped. Other places where there are numbering issues are at *current* positions 14, 94, 108 and 231.
Utunga (
talk)90, 91, 91, 91, 94 and 107, 108, 108, 110 and 229, 229, 231.
90, 91, 91, 91, 91, 94 and 107, 108, 108, 108, 110 and 229, 229, 229, 231.
Done, thanks
Underyx. Sorry
Cannolis, I was working on this before you posted! (Mind-numbing indeed.) Someone may want to double-check my work. Cheers,
Little
Mountain
5
19:50, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
There are still three buildings in the under construction list that said they finished last year, does anybody know anything about these three so as to add them to the main list or push back their completion date? Guyb123321 ( talk) 14:37, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
List of tallest buildings in the world has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
111.119.180.122 ( talk) 22:46, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Karachi Port Trust 117floors
Canton Tower was the world's highest building from 2009 August to 2011. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.18.25.231 ( talk) 11:45, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
since 7.10.2014!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please add it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.102.132.229 ( talk) 09:00, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
It is listed as 828 m in the "Height to roof" section. However, its own article's infobox has "Top floor" with "584.5 m". I thought they should be the same, or possibly height of the floor added to the figure. If it is indeed correct, I suggest "highest floor" list be added to the article. 82.141.73.182 ( talk) 01:16, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
List of tallest buildings in the world has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Could you please add the Warisan Merdeka to the U/C Section of the page. It is a minimum of 600M tall, with 188 floors, located in KL. Construction started this year and is due to be completed in 2019
L.A Regent ( talk) 19:11, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Done - but
Warisan Merdeka is only planned to have 118 floors, not 188, and the information seems slightly vague, so it may be removed or demoted. -
Arjayay (
talk)
07:57, 22 August 2014 (UTC)