This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Astronomy: Astronomical objects Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

The contents of the 20 Camelopardalis page were merged into List of stars in Camelopardalis on 6 November 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

The contents of the 19 Camelopardalis page were merged into List of stars in Camelopardalis on 14 March 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

20 Camelopardalis appears to fail when evaluated against Wikipedia:Notability_(astronomical_objects)#Basic_notability, so I've tagged it for merge. Presumably that's also true of other objects which currently do not have articles, so it might be a good idea to de-link them rather than implicitly suggest they should have articles. -- Beland ( talk) 22:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC) reply

  Y  Merger complete. Klbrain ( talk) 08:35, 6 November 2020 (UTC) reply

I propose that 20 Cam be split into a separate page called 20 Camelopardalis. There's been substantial info about star. 400Weir ( talk) 21:56, 23 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Has anything substantial been published about this star in the six months since the article was merged? Perhaps add a few links to the publications that you feel would make it notable? My own searches found nothing. Lithopsian ( talk) 13:05, 24 June 2021 (UTC) reply