This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I was doing some research on Desktop Search engine and came across Doodle ( http://gnunet.org/doodle/) which is not include. Maybe a suggestion to include this ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.66.120.91 ( talk) 15:53, 18 March 2007 (UTC).
Should links to websites be added next to wikis, something like
or
207.229.174.119 03:13, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
http://www.mugle.co.uk - UK based music search engine for concert tickets, gigs etc. Indexes major ticket vendors. Also wiki'd at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mugle —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Th3one23 ( talk • contribs) 21:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC). -- Th3one23 21:17, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Please add Shopwiki. Funtick 17:47, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
In order to keep this list under some semblance of control, I've been removing redirects from the list. For example, Google Blog Search does not have its own article, so it's not on the list. However, several redirects I recently removed were quickly re-added without comment. It would be nice if we could reach consensus on this issue. Does anybody else have thoughts on the subject? - EurekaLott 06:48, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Could someone add those two search engines? http://www.mindbreeze.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.117.100.93 ( talk) 20:21, August 22, 2007 (UTC)
Do you think it's legitimate that Wikia Search has a link on the Open Source Search Engines section? It's a development project without any actual search engine. I understand that Jimmy is the founder of Wikia and all but I don't think we'd do the same for competitors like Powerset. Edits involving powerset seem to get quickly reverted (and rightfully so because the public hasn't actually seen the product yet!). -- Searchmaven 18:55, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
This is such a partial list because times have moved on since it was started that it really has no encyclopedic value and should be merged into search engine. Examples of missing entries are whois entries (domain name search), wikipedia search and hundreds more. This article was valid a few years but is now not. What do others think. Thanks, SqueakBox 19:35, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
I am adding this to the top of the article to relace the "this is a list of search engines"
I think this more accurately describes the current state of this page, but feel free to edit/add to cover anything I missed. I note that the need for a definition has been raised before, and also note that the list is specifically for items that have a Wikipedia entry rather than be a true list of available search engines. As a programmer maybe I am biased but this is the definition that I understand to be true:
Note that it refers to a PROGRAM not an application that uses a search engine. It seems to me the loose usage here of 'engine' is similar to the widespread use of the word 'database' to mean a DBMS (like SQL server). I would like to see a 'list of search engines'(as defined by the OED) but then this list will need to be split up into more specific lists. Ray3055 ( talk) 13:30, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Magellan was one of the earliest. Where is it? -- Scottandrewhutchins ( talk) 20:52, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Seems to me the contents list could do with putting in alphabetical order and also having sub-categories. Any objections to major categories WWW and non-Web/other for example and then putting all the vertical search and 'general search engines' under WWW; and Open source, Enterprise Search and Desktop search etc under non-Web/other? These are just initial thoughts - other suggestions welcome. Seems also that the Vendor list (or simplified version) on Enterprise search could be moved to here also, so that article can be expanded properly and not be just a list. Ray3055 ( talk) 11:15, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
I have added some 7-10 new search engine names under medical search engines.
Seriously some of the things that people think are search engines are ridiculous. For example, the specialist 'search engines' that are listed. I use some of them all the time, but they are not search engines. They USE a search engine, but they themselves are NOT search engines.
Maybe this analogy will help people to understand...
The Honda V-Tec 2.2 engine is used in several models of Honda motor vehicles (e.g. Prelude, Integra, Accord). Each of these models of cars are different from each other, but what drives them is not the 'Prelude' engine, or the 'Integra' engine. No what drives them is the Honda V-Tec engine.
Websites are the same. They might store different information but their search functions are driven by a search engine. This might have been especially developed for the website, but the much more likely scenario is that the website owner purchased and adapted a commercial website engine. This might be Google's service, or it might be the purchase of a product like the Zoom Search Engine (Wrensoft) that is then implemented and adapted to their website.
So lets re-examine all these supposed search engines listed here and identify those that are truly a 'search engine' as opposed to those that use a search engine.
Cheers, Sim —Preceding unsigned comment added by SimParadox ( talk • contribs) 03:14, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Edit: P.S. An example of what I am talking about is seen in the first post in this discussion. The author even states that it is a google-based search engine. Please see the difference: The search engine is Google, mozbot.com is a search site not a search engine. Start up a list of 'Search Sites' if you like, but please lets keep 'Search Engines' restricted to only those things that are actually search engines. Thanks. SimParadox ( talk) 03:25, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
I understand that this is the proper way to ask for one of my company's websites to be included in a wikipedia page. My company owns and operates several vertical search engines. Would it be possible to add a category for vertical search engines and add http://search.fivemushrooms.com (Five Mushrooms Food Search Engine) to it? Five mushrooms falls into the category of "portal" as described in the vertical search page of Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.62.161.76 ( talk) 17:45, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
From the article " Web search engine", I selected "What links here", and for each listed page which I selected, I read the beginning of the article and selected "What links here" to see whether List of search engines was included. In the case of candidates for addition to the article " List of search engines", in most cases I copied the first sentence and linked the name of the article. Here are 40 candidates.
-- Wavelength ( talk) 16:22, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
I have found, after closer scrutiny, that six of these are listed on List of search engines.
That leaves thirty-four.
I have edited Multisearch so that the first sentence now is:
Archie is disambiguated to Archie search engine.
-- Wavelength ( talk) 15:33, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Can we add Monster Crawler to the meta-search engine list?
About Monster Crawler combines the power of all the leading search engines together in one search box to deliver the best combined results. This is what we call metasearch. The process is more efficient and yields many more relevant results.
Monster Crawler provides an easy way to search more of the Web by harnessing the collective power of the most popular engines. The Internet is an enormous and constantly changing medium, making it impossible for any single engine to reach the entire Web. Using our algorithmic metasearch technology, Monster Crawler takes results from the leading search engines (Yahoo Search!, Google, MSN, Ask), eliminates the duplicates and delivers you the most comprehensive set of results. You benefit by obtaining a quicker, more accurate set of results to your query.
Monster Crawler's algorithmic metasearch technology blends and ranks the results derived from each of the separate engines based on the specific terms you type. If, for example, you type the words "computer prices", the resulting search will include many commercial Web pages containing information on businesses offering computers for sale. If, on the other hand, you type the words "computer technology", your results will be weighted toward articles, information and other research about computers. Monster Crawler also provides multimedia results including images, audio, video, news, and local information.
History
Metasearch engine Monster Crawler was founded by several Southern Illinois University graduates in 1999. It quickly grew a following among internet users who enjoyed the capability to query multiple search engines with just one click. Monster Crawler grew rapidly among the local college and St. Louis Midwest markets. Monster Crawler now attracts a worldwide market and has one of the highest retention rates in the industry with over 50% of our users visiting 30 or more times per month. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
71.244.254.227 (
talk) 22:27, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Can we add 3dsn.com to Media search engines?
With database of hundreds of thousands 3D and creative graphics item links, 3DSN (3D Search Network) gives user the ability to quickly and easily locate right graphics content at right online resources and for the right price (or for free if any).
The ability to run multiple search sessions within one browser window makes search process more intuitive. Open one more browser window and you will get 10 search sessions (unlike Google standard search which offers one search session per browser window).
There is another cool feature at 3DSN: 'My Searches' catalog. User may run as many searches as he likes and store selected links in 'My Searches' catalog. Once registered, user may save 'My Searches' catalog content for future use.
There is even more. Users now have the ability to rate, comment and report content. Any item you like/dislike could be commented and/or rated. The stuff you feel is distributed illegally could be reported. So do not put your project in jeopardy when you are planning to purchase 3D creative content online, - check at 3DSN.com first, - the content may be reported!
Slozovsk ( talk) 22:30, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Can we add this search engine to the sub-headding (Question and answer) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomas1189 ( talk • contribs) 18:56, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Not unless and until it has its own viable page existing. DMacks ( talk) 19:35, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, can we add ChunkIt! to this list, it would fall under the "Visual Search Engine" title, and also even "Metasearch". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjbyrne ( talk • contribs) 22:26, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
my follow up to a cited need for more listings at "Search Engine".
Seeing the above just gave me more reason to write more of the same (please) for same reasons. I also edited a post on "Search Engines" citing a need to add Gogimon Search Machine in a special catagory, first since it isn't in any catagory, even the simplist. It could also be added as ChunkIt requested to"Metasearch" or "Visual search engine".Gogimon has all the same qualities as ChunkIt, but with the extra "Mind Reader" which learns your search preferences while reading behind the page (and more secrets). Zeeknay Tzfat July 3,2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeeknayTzfat ( talk • contribs) 01:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
I realized that it wasn't included the search engine: http://www.crawler.com I've just added it in order to expand the article, always with trustful information. Thnks. Jllb21 ( talk) 17:43, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
In the meantime, I re-added the comparison shopping engines.
The
search engine page says "A search engine or search service is a document retrieval system designed to help find information stored on a computer system, such as on the World Wide Web, inside a corporate or proprietary network, or in a personal computer. The search engine allows one to ask for content meeting specific criteria"
This is an extremely broad definition, given the extremely broad meaning of "document" in this context. These systems find documents about comparative prices. This is not linkspam--this page is intended to list anything in widespread use of or technical note.
Can those who do not like it please explain the criteria by which these are not search engines but the property or business search engines are?
Personally, I do not particularly like the term "search engine" but, again, what is a good alternative?
DGG 03:32, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Could we re-structure the list of search engines adding a category "Thematic Search Engines"? This could potentially include "News Search Engines", "Property Search Engines", "Charity Search Engines", "Business Search Engines", "Medical Search Engines". Thematic search engines often employ semantic web techniques and thematic entity extraction (e.g. a legal search engine may be able to identify references to laws or definitive legal texts; or a property search engine may be able to identify zip codes), making them a somewhat special category. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 168.202.64.1 ( talk • contribs) 21 Nov 2006.
Could we add Dooblet -- the search service to find alternatives? dooblet -- a search engine to find alternatives 09:39, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
I was wondering if I should add the searchengine Nextbio, I don't see a wikipedia page but I have also seen its been deleted 3 times before. Should I create a wikipedia page and then add the searchengine here? Movado73 ( talk) 18:42, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, can we add ChunkIt! to this list please. I posted a couple weeks ago, no response. Thanks
GlobalFileSearch is a internet search engine that launched in beginning of 2008. Service is allow to search public FTP files over internet. (GlobalFileSearch.com) —Preceding unsigned comment added by EvgS ( talk • contribs) 21:06, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
The ChunkIt! article survived the AfD, so I was hoping it could be placed on this list. As for its type, I'm not quite sure what it would fit under. Possibly "Personal Search Engine", but I guess it could also fit under "Visual" too. Thanks. Mjbyrne ( talk) 17:57, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
[www.doctor-dubai.com] an ok attempt at making a local doctor search engine for dubai, can be under regional i guess. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Junaidq ( talk • contribs) 13:45, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
A new meta search engine has emerged in July 2008. fleeQ.com This should be added, it has some cool functionality never seen before. It uses completely browser based distributed index retrieval. soltrinox August 21st 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Soltrinox ( talk • contribs) 02:50, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
ImQ suggests related searches and gives search results by Google.
Very useful to extend your knowledge on a particular subject, can help discover other sides of a story. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.221.20.225 ( talk) 13:12, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Is it possible to add my open source search engine ? Jaeksoft WebSearch is a full featured crawler and indexer. It is coverred by a GPL3 license. You can check this here: http://www.jaeksoft.com/websearch.html Regards, Emmanuel Keller. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emmanuel.keller ( talk • contribs) 08:59, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Is it possible to add a new Advertising Free Model and list the Ad Free search engine - targ8.com which uses TAB directories to prioritise sites, rather than Google Adsense? You can check this here: http://www.targ8.com/ Regards, Neil Bant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.50.186.5 ( talk) 11:09, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
In the german Wikipedia is not the Article Liste von Suchmaschinen BobaCartman ( talk) 07:16, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, how about adding this biology/bioinformatics search engine? www.Vadlo.com I will leave it upto some good moderators to decide and act! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Described ( talk • contribs) 15:43, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
128.135.170.7 ( talk) 20:56, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
I would like to add http://www.xdccreport.com/ - A IRC/XDCC search engine. I would also like to add http://www.majortorrent.com/ - A bit torrent meta search engine. CaseyPC ( talk) 06:35, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I was doing some research on Desktop Search engine and came across Doodle ( http://gnunet.org/doodle/) which is not include. Maybe a suggestion to include this ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.66.120.91 ( talk) 15:53, 18 March 2007 (UTC).
Should links to websites be added next to wikis, something like
or
207.229.174.119 03:13, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
http://www.mugle.co.uk - UK based music search engine for concert tickets, gigs etc. Indexes major ticket vendors. Also wiki'd at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mugle —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Th3one23 ( talk • contribs) 21:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC). -- Th3one23 21:17, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Please add Shopwiki. Funtick 17:47, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
In order to keep this list under some semblance of control, I've been removing redirects from the list. For example, Google Blog Search does not have its own article, so it's not on the list. However, several redirects I recently removed were quickly re-added without comment. It would be nice if we could reach consensus on this issue. Does anybody else have thoughts on the subject? - EurekaLott 06:48, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Could someone add those two search engines? http://www.mindbreeze.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.117.100.93 ( talk) 20:21, August 22, 2007 (UTC)
Do you think it's legitimate that Wikia Search has a link on the Open Source Search Engines section? It's a development project without any actual search engine. I understand that Jimmy is the founder of Wikia and all but I don't think we'd do the same for competitors like Powerset. Edits involving powerset seem to get quickly reverted (and rightfully so because the public hasn't actually seen the product yet!). -- Searchmaven 18:55, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
This is such a partial list because times have moved on since it was started that it really has no encyclopedic value and should be merged into search engine. Examples of missing entries are whois entries (domain name search), wikipedia search and hundreds more. This article was valid a few years but is now not. What do others think. Thanks, SqueakBox 19:35, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
I am adding this to the top of the article to relace the "this is a list of search engines"
I think this more accurately describes the current state of this page, but feel free to edit/add to cover anything I missed. I note that the need for a definition has been raised before, and also note that the list is specifically for items that have a Wikipedia entry rather than be a true list of available search engines. As a programmer maybe I am biased but this is the definition that I understand to be true:
Note that it refers to a PROGRAM not an application that uses a search engine. It seems to me the loose usage here of 'engine' is similar to the widespread use of the word 'database' to mean a DBMS (like SQL server). I would like to see a 'list of search engines'(as defined by the OED) but then this list will need to be split up into more specific lists. Ray3055 ( talk) 13:30, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Magellan was one of the earliest. Where is it? -- Scottandrewhutchins ( talk) 20:52, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Seems to me the contents list could do with putting in alphabetical order and also having sub-categories. Any objections to major categories WWW and non-Web/other for example and then putting all the vertical search and 'general search engines' under WWW; and Open source, Enterprise Search and Desktop search etc under non-Web/other? These are just initial thoughts - other suggestions welcome. Seems also that the Vendor list (or simplified version) on Enterprise search could be moved to here also, so that article can be expanded properly and not be just a list. Ray3055 ( talk) 11:15, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
I have added some 7-10 new search engine names under medical search engines.
Seriously some of the things that people think are search engines are ridiculous. For example, the specialist 'search engines' that are listed. I use some of them all the time, but they are not search engines. They USE a search engine, but they themselves are NOT search engines.
Maybe this analogy will help people to understand...
The Honda V-Tec 2.2 engine is used in several models of Honda motor vehicles (e.g. Prelude, Integra, Accord). Each of these models of cars are different from each other, but what drives them is not the 'Prelude' engine, or the 'Integra' engine. No what drives them is the Honda V-Tec engine.
Websites are the same. They might store different information but their search functions are driven by a search engine. This might have been especially developed for the website, but the much more likely scenario is that the website owner purchased and adapted a commercial website engine. This might be Google's service, or it might be the purchase of a product like the Zoom Search Engine (Wrensoft) that is then implemented and adapted to their website.
So lets re-examine all these supposed search engines listed here and identify those that are truly a 'search engine' as opposed to those that use a search engine.
Cheers, Sim —Preceding unsigned comment added by SimParadox ( talk • contribs) 03:14, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Edit: P.S. An example of what I am talking about is seen in the first post in this discussion. The author even states that it is a google-based search engine. Please see the difference: The search engine is Google, mozbot.com is a search site not a search engine. Start up a list of 'Search Sites' if you like, but please lets keep 'Search Engines' restricted to only those things that are actually search engines. Thanks. SimParadox ( talk) 03:25, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
I understand that this is the proper way to ask for one of my company's websites to be included in a wikipedia page. My company owns and operates several vertical search engines. Would it be possible to add a category for vertical search engines and add http://search.fivemushrooms.com (Five Mushrooms Food Search Engine) to it? Five mushrooms falls into the category of "portal" as described in the vertical search page of Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.62.161.76 ( talk) 17:45, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
From the article " Web search engine", I selected "What links here", and for each listed page which I selected, I read the beginning of the article and selected "What links here" to see whether List of search engines was included. In the case of candidates for addition to the article " List of search engines", in most cases I copied the first sentence and linked the name of the article. Here are 40 candidates.
-- Wavelength ( talk) 16:22, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
I have found, after closer scrutiny, that six of these are listed on List of search engines.
That leaves thirty-four.
I have edited Multisearch so that the first sentence now is:
Archie is disambiguated to Archie search engine.
-- Wavelength ( talk) 15:33, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Can we add Monster Crawler to the meta-search engine list?
About Monster Crawler combines the power of all the leading search engines together in one search box to deliver the best combined results. This is what we call metasearch. The process is more efficient and yields many more relevant results.
Monster Crawler provides an easy way to search more of the Web by harnessing the collective power of the most popular engines. The Internet is an enormous and constantly changing medium, making it impossible for any single engine to reach the entire Web. Using our algorithmic metasearch technology, Monster Crawler takes results from the leading search engines (Yahoo Search!, Google, MSN, Ask), eliminates the duplicates and delivers you the most comprehensive set of results. You benefit by obtaining a quicker, more accurate set of results to your query.
Monster Crawler's algorithmic metasearch technology blends and ranks the results derived from each of the separate engines based on the specific terms you type. If, for example, you type the words "computer prices", the resulting search will include many commercial Web pages containing information on businesses offering computers for sale. If, on the other hand, you type the words "computer technology", your results will be weighted toward articles, information and other research about computers. Monster Crawler also provides multimedia results including images, audio, video, news, and local information.
History
Metasearch engine Monster Crawler was founded by several Southern Illinois University graduates in 1999. It quickly grew a following among internet users who enjoyed the capability to query multiple search engines with just one click. Monster Crawler grew rapidly among the local college and St. Louis Midwest markets. Monster Crawler now attracts a worldwide market and has one of the highest retention rates in the industry with over 50% of our users visiting 30 or more times per month. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
71.244.254.227 (
talk) 22:27, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Can we add 3dsn.com to Media search engines?
With database of hundreds of thousands 3D and creative graphics item links, 3DSN (3D Search Network) gives user the ability to quickly and easily locate right graphics content at right online resources and for the right price (or for free if any).
The ability to run multiple search sessions within one browser window makes search process more intuitive. Open one more browser window and you will get 10 search sessions (unlike Google standard search which offers one search session per browser window).
There is another cool feature at 3DSN: 'My Searches' catalog. User may run as many searches as he likes and store selected links in 'My Searches' catalog. Once registered, user may save 'My Searches' catalog content for future use.
There is even more. Users now have the ability to rate, comment and report content. Any item you like/dislike could be commented and/or rated. The stuff you feel is distributed illegally could be reported. So do not put your project in jeopardy when you are planning to purchase 3D creative content online, - check at 3DSN.com first, - the content may be reported!
Slozovsk ( talk) 22:30, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Can we add this search engine to the sub-headding (Question and answer) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomas1189 ( talk • contribs) 18:56, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Not unless and until it has its own viable page existing. DMacks ( talk) 19:35, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, can we add ChunkIt! to this list, it would fall under the "Visual Search Engine" title, and also even "Metasearch". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjbyrne ( talk • contribs) 22:26, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
my follow up to a cited need for more listings at "Search Engine".
Seeing the above just gave me more reason to write more of the same (please) for same reasons. I also edited a post on "Search Engines" citing a need to add Gogimon Search Machine in a special catagory, first since it isn't in any catagory, even the simplist. It could also be added as ChunkIt requested to"Metasearch" or "Visual search engine".Gogimon has all the same qualities as ChunkIt, but with the extra "Mind Reader" which learns your search preferences while reading behind the page (and more secrets). Zeeknay Tzfat July 3,2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeeknayTzfat ( talk • contribs) 01:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
I realized that it wasn't included the search engine: http://www.crawler.com I've just added it in order to expand the article, always with trustful information. Thnks. Jllb21 ( talk) 17:43, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
In the meantime, I re-added the comparison shopping engines.
The
search engine page says "A search engine or search service is a document retrieval system designed to help find information stored on a computer system, such as on the World Wide Web, inside a corporate or proprietary network, or in a personal computer. The search engine allows one to ask for content meeting specific criteria"
This is an extremely broad definition, given the extremely broad meaning of "document" in this context. These systems find documents about comparative prices. This is not linkspam--this page is intended to list anything in widespread use of or technical note.
Can those who do not like it please explain the criteria by which these are not search engines but the property or business search engines are?
Personally, I do not particularly like the term "search engine" but, again, what is a good alternative?
DGG 03:32, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Could we re-structure the list of search engines adding a category "Thematic Search Engines"? This could potentially include "News Search Engines", "Property Search Engines", "Charity Search Engines", "Business Search Engines", "Medical Search Engines". Thematic search engines often employ semantic web techniques and thematic entity extraction (e.g. a legal search engine may be able to identify references to laws or definitive legal texts; or a property search engine may be able to identify zip codes), making them a somewhat special category. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 168.202.64.1 ( talk • contribs) 21 Nov 2006.
Could we add Dooblet -- the search service to find alternatives? dooblet -- a search engine to find alternatives 09:39, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
I was wondering if I should add the searchengine Nextbio, I don't see a wikipedia page but I have also seen its been deleted 3 times before. Should I create a wikipedia page and then add the searchengine here? Movado73 ( talk) 18:42, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, can we add ChunkIt! to this list please. I posted a couple weeks ago, no response. Thanks
GlobalFileSearch is a internet search engine that launched in beginning of 2008. Service is allow to search public FTP files over internet. (GlobalFileSearch.com) —Preceding unsigned comment added by EvgS ( talk • contribs) 21:06, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
The ChunkIt! article survived the AfD, so I was hoping it could be placed on this list. As for its type, I'm not quite sure what it would fit under. Possibly "Personal Search Engine", but I guess it could also fit under "Visual" too. Thanks. Mjbyrne ( talk) 17:57, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
[www.doctor-dubai.com] an ok attempt at making a local doctor search engine for dubai, can be under regional i guess. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Junaidq ( talk • contribs) 13:45, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
A new meta search engine has emerged in July 2008. fleeQ.com This should be added, it has some cool functionality never seen before. It uses completely browser based distributed index retrieval. soltrinox August 21st 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Soltrinox ( talk • contribs) 02:50, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
ImQ suggests related searches and gives search results by Google.
Very useful to extend your knowledge on a particular subject, can help discover other sides of a story. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.221.20.225 ( talk) 13:12, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Is it possible to add my open source search engine ? Jaeksoft WebSearch is a full featured crawler and indexer. It is coverred by a GPL3 license. You can check this here: http://www.jaeksoft.com/websearch.html Regards, Emmanuel Keller. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emmanuel.keller ( talk • contribs) 08:59, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Is it possible to add a new Advertising Free Model and list the Ad Free search engine - targ8.com which uses TAB directories to prioritise sites, rather than Google Adsense? You can check this here: http://www.targ8.com/ Regards, Neil Bant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.50.186.5 ( talk) 11:09, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
In the german Wikipedia is not the Article Liste von Suchmaschinen BobaCartman ( talk) 07:16, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, how about adding this biology/bioinformatics search engine? www.Vadlo.com I will leave it upto some good moderators to decide and act! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Described ( talk • contribs) 15:43, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
128.135.170.7 ( talk) 20:56, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
I would like to add http://www.xdccreport.com/ - A IRC/XDCC search engine. I would also like to add http://www.majortorrent.com/ - A bit torrent meta search engine. CaseyPC ( talk) 06:35, 4 November 2008 (UTC)