This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of programs broadcast by Toonami article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If I remember correctly it aired back in 03/04 alongside Cowboy Bebop and Case Closed. Thankx
It was originally aired on Adult Swim alongside Case Closed and Bebop, yes, but it was only aired on Toonami during the April Fool's Day airing. -- Toonipedia ( talk) 19:45, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Please be advised: This section was edited by Knighthammer to maintain consistent format throughout this discussion page. The original conversation can be viewed at 2007-08-03T12:30:19 when the last admin, Bobblehead commented on this discussion page. This information can be compared and collaborated for authenticity.
History | User | Description |
---|---|---|
68.202.26.33 | Deleted Page | |
71.235.175.147 | Added TV-MA Shows that never aired | |
2007-08-02T17:43:21 | 128.107.28.142 | Added bias information in Trivia Section that was unrelated to article. |
2007-08-02T17:32:54 | 69.138.203.159 | Changed Titles without Discussion, Discussion Page explicitly requests discussion before such changes |
2007-08-02T16:50:06 | BlackJexus | Added non-animated content Bewitched and ridiculed content on page |
2007-08-02T22:45:04 | 76.17.234.168 | Changed Toonami Schedule |
2007-08-02T22:45:27 | 71.243.50.208 | Changed Toonami Schedule |
2007-08-02T22:42:23 | 76.17.234.168 | Changed Toonami Schedule |
2007-08-02T22:57:35 | 69.138.203.159 | Removed Sections |
2007-08-02T23:06:32 | 71.243.50.208 | Undoing work by other users. |
2007-08-02T23:07:49 | BlackJexus | COMPLETE Vandalization of Page! |
2007-08-04T23:41:39 | Silverbladesting | Vandalization of page adding inappropriate images on entire page. |
2007-08-04T23:43:20 | Andolivera4 | Added intentionally derogatory information Toonami |
2007-08-04T23:48:29 | Silverbladesting | Vandalized Classic Carton Section |
2007-08-04T23:50:52 | Andolivera4 | Vandalized Info Box |
2007-08-04T23:52:12 | Silverbladesting | Destroyed tables and added "You Suck" in tables. |
2007-08-04T23:55:03 | Andolivera4 | Added "Joey" in Toonami DCAU section along with other vandalism |
Okay, if y'all come under this level of attack again, just skip going to WP:RFP and go directly to WP:AIV and ask for someone to semi-protect the page. Also, y'all have been under attack for 2 hours, why didn't you put some warning templates on the vandals' talk pages? Take a look at WP:VANDAL. Any time that a vandal hits the page and you revert, you should be throwing a warning template on their talk page. It only takes a minute or so and if you get enough warnings on their talk page, you can report them to WP:AIV and get the account blocked after at most 4 vandalisms. All you have to do is after you revert them, go to their talk page and take a look at what is currently on their page. If it is clean, start at {{ uw-vandal1}} and work your way up one at a time. Every time they vandalize, roll up to the next vandalism template until you reach vandal4, if they vandalize again, report them to WP:AIV immediately. On the other hand, if they have a lot of warning templates on their talk page, skip directly to {{ uw-vandal4}}. Bobblehead (rants) 04:49, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Look out for Captain Zechs once he becomes an "established" user. 71.126.192.8 13:15, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Not that there is anything technically wrong with the edit method y'all are using, but you may wish to consider using the preview button. It allows you to see how your edits will display without actually saving the change to the database. One reason for this is that Wikipedia has a cadre of users that patrol the recent changes log and keep an eye out for vandalism. Having a lot of little edits on a single page makes it difficult for someone to wade through and try and figure out if there has been vandalism or not on the page. Bobblehead (rants) 17:30, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Ok, I have two topics I wanna flesh out on the page.
For each of the columns, I picked things that I felt this community in particular would be most interested in. However, many of the columns are spilling over to not only 2 lines but in some cases 5 or 6 lines. As far as overall presentation, it's probably bulking the page up more so then needed.
There are four solutions we could do.
I'm thinking that the Misc information should be simply combined into the respective section it effects.
I think having all the mini headers is making the TOC bigger then it needs to be (all be it easy to update) but it also feels "disorganized".
Thoughts? Knighthammer 05:52, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
I'm going to start setting up the new tables. The new setup utilizes hidden fields to state what is being looked for for each field as well as to (hopefully) quickly find the section you wish to update.
I'll be using the following template to indicate what section I am working on:
I've backed up the CURRENT version Here and will be looking for a template to indicate which section I am working on so everyone knows NOT to update that section in the duration. Knighthammer 06:42, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Since I got reverted part of the way through, just a quick explanation for the change in date format from MM/DD/YYYY. The main reason is that the MM/DD/YYYY format is primarily understood by North American English speakers, so using that format will cause readers from outside the US to misconstrue dates. 8/4/2007 is August 4, 2007 in the US, but for most other English speakers it is April 8, 2007. If you don't like the spelling out of the months like I did, we could always use ISO 8601 formatting, so 2007-04-08 instead of the other formats. ISO 8601 is a little more accessible and less confusing than MM/DD/YYYY for non-US readers and there isn't the chance of confusion.-- Bobblehead (rants) 19:46, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Ben 10 is going to be on Toonami this saturday 11/24/07 at 7:00 followed by a Ben 10 movie. Do not believe me? Go to the website schedule and look! - User:Mark Alvarez —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.112.15 ( talk) 19:58, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Someone wrecked the List of Toonami Animated movies section! -- User:Mark Alvarez —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.112.15 ( talk) 19:48, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
The upper box sais that its airdate was in 2003 but the lower one sais it started airing in February 23 2002. As I recall, it was picked up by Toonami a couple of months after Codename: Kids Next Door sarted and shortly before Rurouni Kenshin started, which would be about Febuary 23 2003.-- 72.88.108.41 ( talk) 03:52, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
This movie is live action, so why is it on list of Toonami Animated movies? -- User:Mark Alvarez —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.112.15 ( talk) 20:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Is it true that Powerpuff Girls Z (the anime counterpart of The Powerpuff Girls) will become part of the Toonami lineup in 2008. -- User:Mkalv —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.112.15 ( talk) 21:19, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Well, we all know that didn't happen.......-- 173.53.83.234 ( talk) 02:23, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
The fuck? I'm nearly certain this movie NEVER aired on Toonami. J'onn J'onzz ( talk) 15:11, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Just to inform you, no episode of One Piece carried a TV-PG-D or TV-PG-DV rating. The highest it ever went to was TV-PG-V. Bobobo, also, never had a TV-PG-D rating. It did, however, carry a TV-PG-V rating for two episodes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.139.11 ( talk) 03:26, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
No, Bobobo did in fact receive a TV-PG-D on occasion. In fact, it was somewhat common for it to receive this rating at one point in time. If you have actual evidence that it received a TV-PG-V, I will allow it, but do not remove the other rating to make way for it-simply leave it at TV-PG-DV. I also must inform you that One Piece did receive a TV-PG-DV rating at least once during the FUNimation run. -- 173.53.83.234 ( talk) 02:22, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
I have recorded down the ratings information for Bobobo and every episode was rated TV-Y7-FV except for episodes 12-15 which were TV-PG, and episodes 51-52 which were TV-PG-V. Here is the link ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pz0IIgDRnxI). As for One Piece, that was more so based on memory, however I can't think of one occurance during its FUNimation run, where a TV-PG-D or TV-PG-DV rating would even be required. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheKillers23 ( talk • contribs) 13:09, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Alright, it looks like what you said for Bobobo is the truth. You may change it back. As for One Piece, I recall seeing it air with a TV-PG-DV only one time, so if you missed it, it would make sense. However, due to my mistake with Bobobo, I realize it's entirely possible that this could be false as well, so you can leave it at TV-PG-V if you want, at least until evidence is found. Just to let you know, a large amount of this is in fact based on memory, due to the fact that not many records or recordings exist online, and ones that do exist are very difficult to find. Either way, thank you for your helpful contribution. We greatly appreciate it.-- 173.53.83.234 ( talk) 22:26, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Starting October 8, 2005, it was not D.I.C.E. that aired in that slot, but rather Duel Masters, and I have specific proof that this was the case. ( http://www.toonzone.net/forums/toonami-archived-forum/151655-duel-masters-overlook-hotel-talkback-spoilers.html) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.139.11 ( talk) 17:57, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for this. Somebody came in and made numerous false edits to the article quite some time ago, and this has been a problem for a while. You may add it back, if the edits are still intact (somebody edited it recently - I am not entirely certain if they are legitimate, however). -- 173.53.83.234 ( talk) 05:01, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
It does not redirect to its Wikipedia page. -- 70.208.129.36 ( talk) 14:31, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I need to unblock the page from editing. 68.5.246.104 ( talk) 00:16, 18 September 2013 (UTC) 68.5.246.104 ( talk) 22:44, 17 September 2013 (UTC).
Not done Please file a request at
WP:RFPP. --
Jakob (
Scream about
the things I've broken)
22:46, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Ghost in the Shell is possibly on hiatus it will return. 68.5.246.104 ( talk) 19:25, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
The programming listings need to be shortened severely or cut, as it violates WP:NOTTVGUIDE. To have 200 main sections makes it unreadable. It's only after I page through the huge list that I get to the list of programs that actually broadcast and have information I can actually make sense of.
If you really need to archive the names of the Toonami blocks, create a separate lineup article as: name of block, start date, end date, time of block (e.g. 3-5PM, 11:30PM-2AM), programs, comments, references to a timeline archive.
Special marathons and minor lineup changes to accommodate for movies should not be listed. The movie section is already there at the bottom. They are probably listed in the main article's history anyway.
This is also missing all the references to news articles and snapshots to the Cartoon Network schedule. - AngusWOOF ( talk) 22:07, 13 April 2014 (UTC) updated 23:07, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
They are referenced in the view history section if you go far back enough. With some effort, it is recoverable. It was not included due to the difficulty of its inclusion. This current version of the list is extremely complicated and is unsuitable for Wikipedia. -- 70.208.140.156 ( talk) 23:50, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
UPDATE: Not trying to suggest the current style does not need work, but in the way it is being restructured is unsuitable. -- 70.208.140.156 ( talk) 23:52, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
I would suggest putting the schedules into lists by year to reduce the size, and getting more to the point (the program list is the main focus of the article, the schedule list isn't). I would also suggest that the schedule list or any other necessary section be put underneath the program list. -- Toonipedia ( talk) 23:57, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
This is slightly off topic, but I have one suggestion. If were are going to entirely remove the schedule list, the current schedule really isn't neccessary. Maybe it could be moved to the Toonami main page. It would probably be more convinent there, if users are expecting to see a program list on this page. -- Toonipedia ( talk) 14:37, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
OK this article is really complicated, and the old revision is just as complicated as well. For one, i don't think "notes" is necessary. this is just a list article, and we don't really need additional notes. Rating, i'm debating of whether its really necessary at all. I removed it in the proposed table. Remember when you want wikitable to be "sortable" to add the "dts" template for dates so that we see "January 1998" at the top instead of "April 2006" (hypothetically).
Title | Initial Airdate | Last Airdate | Rating |
---|---|---|---|
Series A | January 1, 2000 | April 2, 2000 | TV-Y7-FV |
Series B | January 1, 2000 | June 2, 2000 | TV-Y7-FV |
Series C | April 1, 2000 | April 2, 2000 | TV-Y7-FV |
Series D | October 1, 2002 | May 2, 2000 | TV-Y7-FV |
I highly suggest making a separate list-article for the current revival of the series, and make this article the current version. List of programs broadcast by Toonami (1997-2008) and List of programs broadcast by Toonami (2012-present). Also, separate these lists by main block and "Special blocks" to those that were special events and make sure to include the years its been. for example: Midnight run (1999-2003) and Giant Robot Week (2003). It'll be easier to navigate through it all.
I "probably" oversimplified the list, if you feel we need to add another category, i'm flexible with the list, so long as we don't have "notes" in it discussing various issues. I understand that the notes section was probably there to highlight whether a series aired completely or only aired partially, but thats ok. If theres an alternative that can make it simpler, then that would be great.
So this is my compromise, and i hope you all like it. I think this will make things much simpler. Lucia Black ( talk) 05:44, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
If the TV ratings columns and uncut/edited for content information is to be useful, it needs to have references to programming guides and news articles to confirm these. - AngusWOOF ( talk) 18:57, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding this title and related entries until it is properly announced in the tumblr lineup, or updated on Adult Swim's schedule which should be after June 7, 2014. [1] Right now, It is unclear whether they will still count this as part of Black Lagoon or rename it after its second season. - AngusWOOF ( talk) 18:42, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
I added a source, proving that it is currently airing. Why was it deleted anyway? -- 74.110.141.60 ( talk) 14:21, 24 June 2014 (UTC) UPDATE: Two different shows going by the same name is not proper reasoning for merging them, in my opinion. This should have been brought up at the talk page earlier. -- 74.110.141.60 ( talk) 14:26, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Before merging them, it should have been discussed on the talk page. I just don't think it makes sense for two different shows to be listed under the same section, even if they shared the same name during listings. Sure, that info should be noted in descriptions, but merging them is just not really going to be clear enough for those who are not already familiar with Toonami or Adult Swim programming. -- 74.110.141.34 ( talk) 13:27, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
It's not a requirement, but that's not the point he's trying to make. He also never said it was a requirement in the first place. -- 63.88.70.247 ( talk) 00:24, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Well it's now listed in this article as two different shows, and it has the notes that Toonami grouped it under the same title. The lineups also stay as is as there was no restructuring or renaming on Toonami's part for the second show.- AngusWOOF ( talk) 16:35, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, there's been a lot of activity over the months with regard to the various parental ratings listed in this article. I am revising my previous stance on the ratings above, and now propose cutting the parental ratings from the article for the following reasons: 1) They do not meet WP:V, a core Wikipedia policy. How can we verify that any of this data is accurate? Where is the central list that tells us which episode of One Piece was TV-14 DL? When a vandal changes that information, who fixes it? The regulars here who know in-their-heart-of-hearts that G-Force: Guardians of Space aired with a TV-Y7-FV rating? Even the dates are problematic because there are few sources. 2) WP:PRIMARY We can't use primary sources (i.e. the broadcast that you watched with your own eyes) for vast amounts of information, as we are doing here. 3) MOS:TV#Things to avoid specifically instructs us to avoid indiscriminate parental ratings, which seems to be ignored here. Thoughts? Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 16:37, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
I've seen that TV's emory guy add ratings before they were posted to the schedule, so I don't know what he's talking about. and i'm reporting cyphidbomb for making fun of another user (regular expressions program wtf) O BLOCK ME I DARE YOU -- Solidvaper ( talk) 00:30, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
I removed the edition counts for the broadcast history table for Toonami 2012-. There is no source for how the schedule changes are counted, and you can still sort by date to see how the schedule changes over time. I also combined October 4 and 11 because the main difference was the ending of Space Dandy and the beginning of the re-airing of Ghost in the Shell. - AngusWOOF ( talk) 02:05, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello! I notice very little in the way of sourcing with regard to all of the very specific broadcast times. What is the academic purpose of listing these times? What are the sources you are all using to included this information? Specific air times are not typically added to these sorts of List of programs broadcast by X network articles. As previously mentioned, Wikipedia is not TV Guide, so I think it's worth discussing why this content is important, whether it is sourced or not, and whether any of it meets WP:V. I suspect that most of this information comes from various editors' personal observations, which (although we old-timers try to communicate this) is not suitable for inclusion, since it likely constitutes original research. And through my travels, I've also experienced numerous niche fandoms that seem to have difficulty differentiated academic content from cruft. Thoughts? If there is no way to verify any of these times, or to explain why we need this level of content for a programming block that seems to largely rebroadcast existing content, then I would probably propose the removal of the times. Grazie, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 05:27, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
I added a deletion request on the basis that all info is present on List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network and List of programs broadcast by Adult Swim. Also, practically nothing is sourced, and the failure to retrieve these sources after multiple reiterations seems to suggest that the info itself is inaccurate. -- OrangeSniper ( talk) 19:56, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Can you please explain why I need to do this beforehand? I'm very sure I did not violate any rule by posting the deletion request and I believe the reasoning was perfectly valid. -- OrangeSniper ( talk) 18:01, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
No, I read what you told me to read. I was slightly confused why the template I added was not suitable for the article, but I understand now. Thanks. I decided it was best not to request deletion considering the article is still very active, as you said. Sorry for the confusion. -- OrangeSniper ( talk) 20:22, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
A recent edit of mine was reversed with one of the main reasons cited being that mention of broadcasts on other networks aren't relevant and have nothing to do with Toonami's broadcast of a show. I'm sure others who have been here longer know better than I do, I'm not questioning the decision, but I am curious if there is any kind of policy or guideline to take into account if a show has aired elsewhere before? Some show descriptions already mention broadcasts on other networks, others don't, so it seems a little inconsistent. Should such information only be mentioned under certain circumstances?
And while we're at it, what kinds of information is recommended for show notes? Many shows are completely blank. Surely some bit of info could be found to give every program something in the Notes box, however small. WisperGee ( talk) 08:06, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Treat as separate program (Black Lagoon / Second Barrage) or second season (The Big O, Space Dandy)? - AngusWOOF ( talk) 10:48, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Isn't this a given for any show broadcast on Toonami / Cartoon Network / Adult Swim? This isn't HBO or some channel where they don't censor. It should be the inverse case that a show is advertised to be uncut. Otherwise this is very difficult to document.- AngusWOOF ( talk) 01:59, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
List of programs broadcast by Toonami. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 10:36, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of programs broadcast by Toonami. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:05, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of programs broadcast by Toonami. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:45, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
These two links found on the main page describe changes made to the schedule that have not been acknowledged. If they do not, please explain why.
March 24: https://www.facebook.com/Toonami/posts/1881072838850221 - This link indicates that Outlaw Star was removed, Space Dandy moved to a different time, and there were 2 episodes of Cowboy Bebop for just that night.
April 7: https://twitter.com/ToonamiNews/status/982765857603489794 - This link indicates that Black Clover moved from its previous spot at 11:30 PM to 1:00 AM, other shows were shifted as a result, and two smaller programs aired in the 11:30 spot before FLCL took that spot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.80.103.151 ( talk) 20:11, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Under Western animated movies, what order were we exactly putting those Batman movies in? Do colons count as part of the alphabet system? What about ampersands? Is "the" considered part of the alphabet system?
I tried to add the two that will premiere soon, only to be met with confusion. I looked over, and it seems there were too many cooks in the kitchen, so to speak. What order should those movies go in? Matty-chan ( talk) 00:43, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
My vote for the order they should go in:
Batman & Mr. Freeze: SubZero
Batman Beyond: Return of the Joker
Batman: Gotham Knight
Batman: Mask of the Phantasm
Batman: Mystery of the Batwoman
Batman Ninja
Batman: The Dark Knight Returns Part 1
Batman: The Dark Knight Returns Part 2
Batman: Under The Red Hood
Batman: Year One
Matty-chan ( talk) 01:36, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Been a few days, no objections, so I'll go ahead and do that. Matty-chan ( talk) 00:48, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of programs broadcast by Toonami article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If I remember correctly it aired back in 03/04 alongside Cowboy Bebop and Case Closed. Thankx
It was originally aired on Adult Swim alongside Case Closed and Bebop, yes, but it was only aired on Toonami during the April Fool's Day airing. -- Toonipedia ( talk) 19:45, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Please be advised: This section was edited by Knighthammer to maintain consistent format throughout this discussion page. The original conversation can be viewed at 2007-08-03T12:30:19 when the last admin, Bobblehead commented on this discussion page. This information can be compared and collaborated for authenticity.
History | User | Description |
---|---|---|
68.202.26.33 | Deleted Page | |
71.235.175.147 | Added TV-MA Shows that never aired | |
2007-08-02T17:43:21 | 128.107.28.142 | Added bias information in Trivia Section that was unrelated to article. |
2007-08-02T17:32:54 | 69.138.203.159 | Changed Titles without Discussion, Discussion Page explicitly requests discussion before such changes |
2007-08-02T16:50:06 | BlackJexus | Added non-animated content Bewitched and ridiculed content on page |
2007-08-02T22:45:04 | 76.17.234.168 | Changed Toonami Schedule |
2007-08-02T22:45:27 | 71.243.50.208 | Changed Toonami Schedule |
2007-08-02T22:42:23 | 76.17.234.168 | Changed Toonami Schedule |
2007-08-02T22:57:35 | 69.138.203.159 | Removed Sections |
2007-08-02T23:06:32 | 71.243.50.208 | Undoing work by other users. |
2007-08-02T23:07:49 | BlackJexus | COMPLETE Vandalization of Page! |
2007-08-04T23:41:39 | Silverbladesting | Vandalization of page adding inappropriate images on entire page. |
2007-08-04T23:43:20 | Andolivera4 | Added intentionally derogatory information Toonami |
2007-08-04T23:48:29 | Silverbladesting | Vandalized Classic Carton Section |
2007-08-04T23:50:52 | Andolivera4 | Vandalized Info Box |
2007-08-04T23:52:12 | Silverbladesting | Destroyed tables and added "You Suck" in tables. |
2007-08-04T23:55:03 | Andolivera4 | Added "Joey" in Toonami DCAU section along with other vandalism |
Okay, if y'all come under this level of attack again, just skip going to WP:RFP and go directly to WP:AIV and ask for someone to semi-protect the page. Also, y'all have been under attack for 2 hours, why didn't you put some warning templates on the vandals' talk pages? Take a look at WP:VANDAL. Any time that a vandal hits the page and you revert, you should be throwing a warning template on their talk page. It only takes a minute or so and if you get enough warnings on their talk page, you can report them to WP:AIV and get the account blocked after at most 4 vandalisms. All you have to do is after you revert them, go to their talk page and take a look at what is currently on their page. If it is clean, start at {{ uw-vandal1}} and work your way up one at a time. Every time they vandalize, roll up to the next vandalism template until you reach vandal4, if they vandalize again, report them to WP:AIV immediately. On the other hand, if they have a lot of warning templates on their talk page, skip directly to {{ uw-vandal4}}. Bobblehead (rants) 04:49, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Look out for Captain Zechs once he becomes an "established" user. 71.126.192.8 13:15, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Not that there is anything technically wrong with the edit method y'all are using, but you may wish to consider using the preview button. It allows you to see how your edits will display without actually saving the change to the database. One reason for this is that Wikipedia has a cadre of users that patrol the recent changes log and keep an eye out for vandalism. Having a lot of little edits on a single page makes it difficult for someone to wade through and try and figure out if there has been vandalism or not on the page. Bobblehead (rants) 17:30, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Ok, I have two topics I wanna flesh out on the page.
For each of the columns, I picked things that I felt this community in particular would be most interested in. However, many of the columns are spilling over to not only 2 lines but in some cases 5 or 6 lines. As far as overall presentation, it's probably bulking the page up more so then needed.
There are four solutions we could do.
I'm thinking that the Misc information should be simply combined into the respective section it effects.
I think having all the mini headers is making the TOC bigger then it needs to be (all be it easy to update) but it also feels "disorganized".
Thoughts? Knighthammer 05:52, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
I'm going to start setting up the new tables. The new setup utilizes hidden fields to state what is being looked for for each field as well as to (hopefully) quickly find the section you wish to update.
I'll be using the following template to indicate what section I am working on:
I've backed up the CURRENT version Here and will be looking for a template to indicate which section I am working on so everyone knows NOT to update that section in the duration. Knighthammer 06:42, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Since I got reverted part of the way through, just a quick explanation for the change in date format from MM/DD/YYYY. The main reason is that the MM/DD/YYYY format is primarily understood by North American English speakers, so using that format will cause readers from outside the US to misconstrue dates. 8/4/2007 is August 4, 2007 in the US, but for most other English speakers it is April 8, 2007. If you don't like the spelling out of the months like I did, we could always use ISO 8601 formatting, so 2007-04-08 instead of the other formats. ISO 8601 is a little more accessible and less confusing than MM/DD/YYYY for non-US readers and there isn't the chance of confusion.-- Bobblehead (rants) 19:46, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Ben 10 is going to be on Toonami this saturday 11/24/07 at 7:00 followed by a Ben 10 movie. Do not believe me? Go to the website schedule and look! - User:Mark Alvarez —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.112.15 ( talk) 19:58, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Someone wrecked the List of Toonami Animated movies section! -- User:Mark Alvarez —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.112.15 ( talk) 19:48, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
The upper box sais that its airdate was in 2003 but the lower one sais it started airing in February 23 2002. As I recall, it was picked up by Toonami a couple of months after Codename: Kids Next Door sarted and shortly before Rurouni Kenshin started, which would be about Febuary 23 2003.-- 72.88.108.41 ( talk) 03:52, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
This movie is live action, so why is it on list of Toonami Animated movies? -- User:Mark Alvarez —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.112.15 ( talk) 20:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Is it true that Powerpuff Girls Z (the anime counterpart of The Powerpuff Girls) will become part of the Toonami lineup in 2008. -- User:Mkalv —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.112.15 ( talk) 21:19, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Well, we all know that didn't happen.......-- 173.53.83.234 ( talk) 02:23, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
The fuck? I'm nearly certain this movie NEVER aired on Toonami. J'onn J'onzz ( talk) 15:11, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Just to inform you, no episode of One Piece carried a TV-PG-D or TV-PG-DV rating. The highest it ever went to was TV-PG-V. Bobobo, also, never had a TV-PG-D rating. It did, however, carry a TV-PG-V rating for two episodes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.139.11 ( talk) 03:26, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
No, Bobobo did in fact receive a TV-PG-D on occasion. In fact, it was somewhat common for it to receive this rating at one point in time. If you have actual evidence that it received a TV-PG-V, I will allow it, but do not remove the other rating to make way for it-simply leave it at TV-PG-DV. I also must inform you that One Piece did receive a TV-PG-DV rating at least once during the FUNimation run. -- 173.53.83.234 ( talk) 02:22, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
I have recorded down the ratings information for Bobobo and every episode was rated TV-Y7-FV except for episodes 12-15 which were TV-PG, and episodes 51-52 which were TV-PG-V. Here is the link ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pz0IIgDRnxI). As for One Piece, that was more so based on memory, however I can't think of one occurance during its FUNimation run, where a TV-PG-D or TV-PG-DV rating would even be required. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheKillers23 ( talk • contribs) 13:09, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Alright, it looks like what you said for Bobobo is the truth. You may change it back. As for One Piece, I recall seeing it air with a TV-PG-DV only one time, so if you missed it, it would make sense. However, due to my mistake with Bobobo, I realize it's entirely possible that this could be false as well, so you can leave it at TV-PG-V if you want, at least until evidence is found. Just to let you know, a large amount of this is in fact based on memory, due to the fact that not many records or recordings exist online, and ones that do exist are very difficult to find. Either way, thank you for your helpful contribution. We greatly appreciate it.-- 173.53.83.234 ( talk) 22:26, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Starting October 8, 2005, it was not D.I.C.E. that aired in that slot, but rather Duel Masters, and I have specific proof that this was the case. ( http://www.toonzone.net/forums/toonami-archived-forum/151655-duel-masters-overlook-hotel-talkback-spoilers.html) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.139.11 ( talk) 17:57, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for this. Somebody came in and made numerous false edits to the article quite some time ago, and this has been a problem for a while. You may add it back, if the edits are still intact (somebody edited it recently - I am not entirely certain if they are legitimate, however). -- 173.53.83.234 ( talk) 05:01, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
It does not redirect to its Wikipedia page. -- 70.208.129.36 ( talk) 14:31, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I need to unblock the page from editing. 68.5.246.104 ( talk) 00:16, 18 September 2013 (UTC) 68.5.246.104 ( talk) 22:44, 17 September 2013 (UTC).
Not done Please file a request at
WP:RFPP. --
Jakob (
Scream about
the things I've broken)
22:46, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Ghost in the Shell is possibly on hiatus it will return. 68.5.246.104 ( talk) 19:25, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
The programming listings need to be shortened severely or cut, as it violates WP:NOTTVGUIDE. To have 200 main sections makes it unreadable. It's only after I page through the huge list that I get to the list of programs that actually broadcast and have information I can actually make sense of.
If you really need to archive the names of the Toonami blocks, create a separate lineup article as: name of block, start date, end date, time of block (e.g. 3-5PM, 11:30PM-2AM), programs, comments, references to a timeline archive.
Special marathons and minor lineup changes to accommodate for movies should not be listed. The movie section is already there at the bottom. They are probably listed in the main article's history anyway.
This is also missing all the references to news articles and snapshots to the Cartoon Network schedule. - AngusWOOF ( talk) 22:07, 13 April 2014 (UTC) updated 23:07, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
They are referenced in the view history section if you go far back enough. With some effort, it is recoverable. It was not included due to the difficulty of its inclusion. This current version of the list is extremely complicated and is unsuitable for Wikipedia. -- 70.208.140.156 ( talk) 23:50, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
UPDATE: Not trying to suggest the current style does not need work, but in the way it is being restructured is unsuitable. -- 70.208.140.156 ( talk) 23:52, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
I would suggest putting the schedules into lists by year to reduce the size, and getting more to the point (the program list is the main focus of the article, the schedule list isn't). I would also suggest that the schedule list or any other necessary section be put underneath the program list. -- Toonipedia ( talk) 23:57, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
This is slightly off topic, but I have one suggestion. If were are going to entirely remove the schedule list, the current schedule really isn't neccessary. Maybe it could be moved to the Toonami main page. It would probably be more convinent there, if users are expecting to see a program list on this page. -- Toonipedia ( talk) 14:37, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
OK this article is really complicated, and the old revision is just as complicated as well. For one, i don't think "notes" is necessary. this is just a list article, and we don't really need additional notes. Rating, i'm debating of whether its really necessary at all. I removed it in the proposed table. Remember when you want wikitable to be "sortable" to add the "dts" template for dates so that we see "January 1998" at the top instead of "April 2006" (hypothetically).
Title | Initial Airdate | Last Airdate | Rating |
---|---|---|---|
Series A | January 1, 2000 | April 2, 2000 | TV-Y7-FV |
Series B | January 1, 2000 | June 2, 2000 | TV-Y7-FV |
Series C | April 1, 2000 | April 2, 2000 | TV-Y7-FV |
Series D | October 1, 2002 | May 2, 2000 | TV-Y7-FV |
I highly suggest making a separate list-article for the current revival of the series, and make this article the current version. List of programs broadcast by Toonami (1997-2008) and List of programs broadcast by Toonami (2012-present). Also, separate these lists by main block and "Special blocks" to those that were special events and make sure to include the years its been. for example: Midnight run (1999-2003) and Giant Robot Week (2003). It'll be easier to navigate through it all.
I "probably" oversimplified the list, if you feel we need to add another category, i'm flexible with the list, so long as we don't have "notes" in it discussing various issues. I understand that the notes section was probably there to highlight whether a series aired completely or only aired partially, but thats ok. If theres an alternative that can make it simpler, then that would be great.
So this is my compromise, and i hope you all like it. I think this will make things much simpler. Lucia Black ( talk) 05:44, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
If the TV ratings columns and uncut/edited for content information is to be useful, it needs to have references to programming guides and news articles to confirm these. - AngusWOOF ( talk) 18:57, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding this title and related entries until it is properly announced in the tumblr lineup, or updated on Adult Swim's schedule which should be after June 7, 2014. [1] Right now, It is unclear whether they will still count this as part of Black Lagoon or rename it after its second season. - AngusWOOF ( talk) 18:42, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
I added a source, proving that it is currently airing. Why was it deleted anyway? -- 74.110.141.60 ( talk) 14:21, 24 June 2014 (UTC) UPDATE: Two different shows going by the same name is not proper reasoning for merging them, in my opinion. This should have been brought up at the talk page earlier. -- 74.110.141.60 ( talk) 14:26, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Before merging them, it should have been discussed on the talk page. I just don't think it makes sense for two different shows to be listed under the same section, even if they shared the same name during listings. Sure, that info should be noted in descriptions, but merging them is just not really going to be clear enough for those who are not already familiar with Toonami or Adult Swim programming. -- 74.110.141.34 ( talk) 13:27, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
It's not a requirement, but that's not the point he's trying to make. He also never said it was a requirement in the first place. -- 63.88.70.247 ( talk) 00:24, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Well it's now listed in this article as two different shows, and it has the notes that Toonami grouped it under the same title. The lineups also stay as is as there was no restructuring or renaming on Toonami's part for the second show.- AngusWOOF ( talk) 16:35, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, there's been a lot of activity over the months with regard to the various parental ratings listed in this article. I am revising my previous stance on the ratings above, and now propose cutting the parental ratings from the article for the following reasons: 1) They do not meet WP:V, a core Wikipedia policy. How can we verify that any of this data is accurate? Where is the central list that tells us which episode of One Piece was TV-14 DL? When a vandal changes that information, who fixes it? The regulars here who know in-their-heart-of-hearts that G-Force: Guardians of Space aired with a TV-Y7-FV rating? Even the dates are problematic because there are few sources. 2) WP:PRIMARY We can't use primary sources (i.e. the broadcast that you watched with your own eyes) for vast amounts of information, as we are doing here. 3) MOS:TV#Things to avoid specifically instructs us to avoid indiscriminate parental ratings, which seems to be ignored here. Thoughts? Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 16:37, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
I've seen that TV's emory guy add ratings before they were posted to the schedule, so I don't know what he's talking about. and i'm reporting cyphidbomb for making fun of another user (regular expressions program wtf) O BLOCK ME I DARE YOU -- Solidvaper ( talk) 00:30, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
I removed the edition counts for the broadcast history table for Toonami 2012-. There is no source for how the schedule changes are counted, and you can still sort by date to see how the schedule changes over time. I also combined October 4 and 11 because the main difference was the ending of Space Dandy and the beginning of the re-airing of Ghost in the Shell. - AngusWOOF ( talk) 02:05, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello! I notice very little in the way of sourcing with regard to all of the very specific broadcast times. What is the academic purpose of listing these times? What are the sources you are all using to included this information? Specific air times are not typically added to these sorts of List of programs broadcast by X network articles. As previously mentioned, Wikipedia is not TV Guide, so I think it's worth discussing why this content is important, whether it is sourced or not, and whether any of it meets WP:V. I suspect that most of this information comes from various editors' personal observations, which (although we old-timers try to communicate this) is not suitable for inclusion, since it likely constitutes original research. And through my travels, I've also experienced numerous niche fandoms that seem to have difficulty differentiated academic content from cruft. Thoughts? If there is no way to verify any of these times, or to explain why we need this level of content for a programming block that seems to largely rebroadcast existing content, then I would probably propose the removal of the times. Grazie, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 05:27, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
I added a deletion request on the basis that all info is present on List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network and List of programs broadcast by Adult Swim. Also, practically nothing is sourced, and the failure to retrieve these sources after multiple reiterations seems to suggest that the info itself is inaccurate. -- OrangeSniper ( talk) 19:56, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Can you please explain why I need to do this beforehand? I'm very sure I did not violate any rule by posting the deletion request and I believe the reasoning was perfectly valid. -- OrangeSniper ( talk) 18:01, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
No, I read what you told me to read. I was slightly confused why the template I added was not suitable for the article, but I understand now. Thanks. I decided it was best not to request deletion considering the article is still very active, as you said. Sorry for the confusion. -- OrangeSniper ( talk) 20:22, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
A recent edit of mine was reversed with one of the main reasons cited being that mention of broadcasts on other networks aren't relevant and have nothing to do with Toonami's broadcast of a show. I'm sure others who have been here longer know better than I do, I'm not questioning the decision, but I am curious if there is any kind of policy or guideline to take into account if a show has aired elsewhere before? Some show descriptions already mention broadcasts on other networks, others don't, so it seems a little inconsistent. Should such information only be mentioned under certain circumstances?
And while we're at it, what kinds of information is recommended for show notes? Many shows are completely blank. Surely some bit of info could be found to give every program something in the Notes box, however small. WisperGee ( talk) 08:06, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Treat as separate program (Black Lagoon / Second Barrage) or second season (The Big O, Space Dandy)? - AngusWOOF ( talk) 10:48, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Isn't this a given for any show broadcast on Toonami / Cartoon Network / Adult Swim? This isn't HBO or some channel where they don't censor. It should be the inverse case that a show is advertised to be uncut. Otherwise this is very difficult to document.- AngusWOOF ( talk) 01:59, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
List of programs broadcast by Toonami. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 10:36, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of programs broadcast by Toonami. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:05, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of programs broadcast by Toonami. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:45, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
These two links found on the main page describe changes made to the schedule that have not been acknowledged. If they do not, please explain why.
March 24: https://www.facebook.com/Toonami/posts/1881072838850221 - This link indicates that Outlaw Star was removed, Space Dandy moved to a different time, and there were 2 episodes of Cowboy Bebop for just that night.
April 7: https://twitter.com/ToonamiNews/status/982765857603489794 - This link indicates that Black Clover moved from its previous spot at 11:30 PM to 1:00 AM, other shows were shifted as a result, and two smaller programs aired in the 11:30 spot before FLCL took that spot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.80.103.151 ( talk) 20:11, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Under Western animated movies, what order were we exactly putting those Batman movies in? Do colons count as part of the alphabet system? What about ampersands? Is "the" considered part of the alphabet system?
I tried to add the two that will premiere soon, only to be met with confusion. I looked over, and it seems there were too many cooks in the kitchen, so to speak. What order should those movies go in? Matty-chan ( talk) 00:43, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
My vote for the order they should go in:
Batman & Mr. Freeze: SubZero
Batman Beyond: Return of the Joker
Batman: Gotham Knight
Batman: Mask of the Phantasm
Batman: Mystery of the Batwoman
Batman Ninja
Batman: The Dark Knight Returns Part 1
Batman: The Dark Knight Returns Part 2
Batman: Under The Red Hood
Batman: Year One
Matty-chan ( talk) 01:36, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Been a few days, no objections, so I'll go ahead and do that. Matty-chan ( talk) 00:48, 3 October 2021 (UTC)