![]() | A fact from List of named tropical cyclones appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 1 July 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
+ + Lar: t/ c 17:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
There are a lot of redlinks in this article (and there will be more as I go through it); that will be fixed when the WPTC disambigs get sorted. In addition the list is far from complete, it only covers the Fiji region back to 1984 and naming began earlier back than that. Oh and aside from linking, making the tables consistent sized would be nice, using some percentage tags in the headers maybe?-- Nilfanion ( talk) 18:54, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
In case anyone cares, Nilfanion and I were working on this in my sandbox. Yes, it is a copy and paste of that, and I'll admit, I didn't even think of moving it. Sorry if that's a problem, but there's the previous versions of this article, starting with this version. -- Hurricanehink ( talk) 21:21, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
If we can get sources indicating which names have been retired/replaced in each basin, should we indicate that a name has been retired? Possibly we can bold the name or put (R) or (r) next to it. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 20:52, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
As of yesterday morning, this article was the 295th longest in wikipedia. Just an FYI. Thegreatdr 19:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Regarding "* indicates a named tropical depression" - this should not apply to post-2000 NWPac storms, because the JMA is both the naming and warning centre. A JTWC TD does not count. – Ch acor 11:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
The name was used in the Atlantic. Does this list include all names ever used for tropical cyclones, or just those used or tropical cyclones that remain in the database? It's an interesting question. Thegreatdr ( talk) 06:22, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
First of all, I don't mean listing systems from before they started naming tropical cyclones in their respective basins. I mean unnamed tropical storms that formed after naming began. An example of what I am talking about would be the Unnamed Tropical Storm from the 1996 Pacific hurricane season. It is a perfectly legitimate tropical storm, and in terms of meeting the naming criteria "tropical cyclone with gale-force winds" it should have been named. But since it was considered a tropical depression operationally, it got no name. Others exist in other basins. In this sense they are the opposite of a named tropical depression. If those named depressions were tropical cyclones that shouldn't have been named, but were, these ones are tropical cyclones that should have been named but weren't. Should they be included as a sort of "appendix"? (They don't really belong under any letter, even U). Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 03:50, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Why the hell not?First of all, I don't mean listing systems from before they started naming tropical cyclones in their respective basins
Could somebody make this a little less confusing by separating the male names and the female names? Thanks. 76.124.224.179 ( talk) 19:49, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
I don't have time to fuss with amending the table, here is a cite, p.12 for Freda in 1965. Skookum1 ( talk) 06:21, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
All of the SPAC names starting in 1999-00 are up to date. Jason Rees ( talk) 22:39, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
This article is largely duplicate to List of historic tropical cyclone names, but the latter is much better organized, easier to edit, and properly sourced. Given how difficult it would be for this one to be sourced (ever), I propose this article be "merged" with the other article (even though, in effect, it would just be a redirect). --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 21:49, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() | A fact from List of named tropical cyclones appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 1 July 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
+ + Lar: t/ c 17:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
There are a lot of redlinks in this article (and there will be more as I go through it); that will be fixed when the WPTC disambigs get sorted. In addition the list is far from complete, it only covers the Fiji region back to 1984 and naming began earlier back than that. Oh and aside from linking, making the tables consistent sized would be nice, using some percentage tags in the headers maybe?-- Nilfanion ( talk) 18:54, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
In case anyone cares, Nilfanion and I were working on this in my sandbox. Yes, it is a copy and paste of that, and I'll admit, I didn't even think of moving it. Sorry if that's a problem, but there's the previous versions of this article, starting with this version. -- Hurricanehink ( talk) 21:21, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
If we can get sources indicating which names have been retired/replaced in each basin, should we indicate that a name has been retired? Possibly we can bold the name or put (R) or (r) next to it. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 20:52, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
As of yesterday morning, this article was the 295th longest in wikipedia. Just an FYI. Thegreatdr 19:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Regarding "* indicates a named tropical depression" - this should not apply to post-2000 NWPac storms, because the JMA is both the naming and warning centre. A JTWC TD does not count. – Ch acor 11:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
The name was used in the Atlantic. Does this list include all names ever used for tropical cyclones, or just those used or tropical cyclones that remain in the database? It's an interesting question. Thegreatdr ( talk) 06:22, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
First of all, I don't mean listing systems from before they started naming tropical cyclones in their respective basins. I mean unnamed tropical storms that formed after naming began. An example of what I am talking about would be the Unnamed Tropical Storm from the 1996 Pacific hurricane season. It is a perfectly legitimate tropical storm, and in terms of meeting the naming criteria "tropical cyclone with gale-force winds" it should have been named. But since it was considered a tropical depression operationally, it got no name. Others exist in other basins. In this sense they are the opposite of a named tropical depression. If those named depressions were tropical cyclones that shouldn't have been named, but were, these ones are tropical cyclones that should have been named but weren't. Should they be included as a sort of "appendix"? (They don't really belong under any letter, even U). Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 03:50, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Why the hell not?First of all, I don't mean listing systems from before they started naming tropical cyclones in their respective basins
Could somebody make this a little less confusing by separating the male names and the female names? Thanks. 76.124.224.179 ( talk) 19:49, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
I don't have time to fuss with amending the table, here is a cite, p.12 for Freda in 1965. Skookum1 ( talk) 06:21, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
All of the SPAC names starting in 1999-00 are up to date. Jason Rees ( talk) 22:39, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
This article is largely duplicate to List of historic tropical cyclone names, but the latter is much better organized, easier to edit, and properly sourced. Given how difficult it would be for this one to be sourced (ever), I propose this article be "merged" with the other article (even though, in effect, it would just be a redirect). --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 21:49, 13 August 2014 (UTC)