![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Talk:List of musical instruments, List of musical instruments see also Hornbostel-Sachs, Musical instrument classification
Where or by whom is this "hydrophone" class "under consideration"? -- Camembert
I have added several types of bagpipe to the list. Although I could think of more, I suspect there are simply too many distinctly different types to list. A more urgent problem occurred to me, though. As of now, the bagpipes are categorised by the type of reed (single or double). However, most bagpipes have at least two pipes, occasionally fitting into both of these categories. The Great Highland Bagpipe, Uilleann Pipe, and probably many other types have a double-reed chanter and single-reed drones, and the opposite might exist (although it probably doesn't, for technical reasons). For now, I'm certain that they're all categorised by the reed of the chanter, but there might be a better way to deal with it. Does anyone know if the Hornbostel-Sachs system has its own way of dealing with this? -- EldKatt 13:39, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Surely a Fender Rhodes is an Ideophone not an Electrophone as the electro-magnetic pick-up only amplifies and does not actually produce the sound. As the tine produces the sound and each one is specifically tuned to resonante at a difeerent pitch, should it not be a 'Struck Ideophone' just as an electric guitar is a 'Plucked Chordophone'? -- Beliefspace 16:11, 3 Feb 2007 (UTC)
What kind of idiophone would this be, although it's shaken it's not indirectly struck. -- Regregex ( talk) 17:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
header 1 | header 2 | header 3 |
---|---|---|
row 1, cell 1 | row 1, cell 2 | row 1, cell 3 |
row 2, cell 1 | row 2, cell 2 | row 2, cell 3 |
header 1 | header 2 | header 3 |
---|---|---|
row 1, cell 1 | row 1, cell 2 | row 1, cell 3 |
row 2, cell 1 | row 2, cell 2 | row 2, cell 3 |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on List of musical instruments by Hornbostel-Sachs number. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.â InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:53, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved all. Closing early as it doesn't look controversial, and main article is already at HornbostelâSachs.  â Amakuru ( talk) 21:50, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
â Per MOS:ENDASH; this is two people. HandsomeFella ( talk) 19:31, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Talk:List of musical instruments, List of musical instruments see also Hornbostel-Sachs, Musical instrument classification
Where or by whom is this "hydrophone" class "under consideration"? -- Camembert
I have added several types of bagpipe to the list. Although I could think of more, I suspect there are simply too many distinctly different types to list. A more urgent problem occurred to me, though. As of now, the bagpipes are categorised by the type of reed (single or double). However, most bagpipes have at least two pipes, occasionally fitting into both of these categories. The Great Highland Bagpipe, Uilleann Pipe, and probably many other types have a double-reed chanter and single-reed drones, and the opposite might exist (although it probably doesn't, for technical reasons). For now, I'm certain that they're all categorised by the reed of the chanter, but there might be a better way to deal with it. Does anyone know if the Hornbostel-Sachs system has its own way of dealing with this? -- EldKatt 13:39, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Surely a Fender Rhodes is an Ideophone not an Electrophone as the electro-magnetic pick-up only amplifies and does not actually produce the sound. As the tine produces the sound and each one is specifically tuned to resonante at a difeerent pitch, should it not be a 'Struck Ideophone' just as an electric guitar is a 'Plucked Chordophone'? -- Beliefspace 16:11, 3 Feb 2007 (UTC)
What kind of idiophone would this be, although it's shaken it's not indirectly struck. -- Regregex ( talk) 17:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
header 1 | header 2 | header 3 |
---|---|---|
row 1, cell 1 | row 1, cell 2 | row 1, cell 3 |
row 2, cell 1 | row 2, cell 2 | row 2, cell 3 |
header 1 | header 2 | header 3 |
---|---|---|
row 1, cell 1 | row 1, cell 2 | row 1, cell 3 |
row 2, cell 1 | row 2, cell 2 | row 2, cell 3 |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on List of musical instruments by Hornbostel-Sachs number. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.â InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:53, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved all. Closing early as it doesn't look controversial, and main article is already at HornbostelâSachs.  â Amakuru ( talk) 21:50, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
â Per MOS:ENDASH; this is two people. HandsomeFella ( talk) 19:31, 10 September 2018 (UTC)