This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of monarchs in Britain by length of reign article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 100 days |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Something's just occured to me - although Elizabeth II is now the longest reigning monarch, she's still not the longest serving queen. This title probably goes to her mother, Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother, who became Queen Consort on 11 December 1936, and retained the title of Queen after the death of her husband until her death on 30 March 2002. This equates to a period of 23850 days (65 years, 109 days). Obviously the Queen Mother shouldn't be in the list as she wasn't a monarch in her own right, but maybe something could be added to the article to mention this?
Incidentally, if my maths is right the present Queen will equal this record on 25 May 2017, if spared. — An optimist on the run! (logged on as Pek the Penguin) 12:05, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
@ Thingg: My problem with the inclusion of these possible future scenarios is that they have nothing to do with the subject of the article: namely, monarchs of Britain and the length of their reigns. OK, so a certain amount of European or World context doesn't hurt, but really saying: if one monarch lives for a certain amount of time AND remains on the throne (which is in no way a certainty after recent abdications in Spain and Netherlands) then they will pass another record; is just over the top. It's like on a pop chart saying if so and so has three more number ones they will hold the record for the most number ones or to take the example you gave, if the sun burns for another 50 billion years it will be the longest lived star in the galaxy. I think we should wait until a record is looming rather than projecting out decades into the future. Btljs ( talk) 11:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Should she still be reigning on –
I'll just leave this here just in case it's ever readded. -- Inops ( talk) 23:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
Okay so I have been trying to just include long reigning monarchs within the United Kingdom's history, and Europe as a whole. The 2nd longest ruling of x wouldn't be as noteworthy as the longest ruling of x for example. This being said I don't know where Eleanor would fall into, would she be considered a monarch? I feel that she very narrowly either fits in or misses the scope. Thoughts are welcomed.... - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 13:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
I realize this will not be popular but what is the reason to have the days of reign added to a current Monarch? 1)- Every article using this has to be updated every 24 hours or be outdated. 2)- It is trivial, unimportant, and "only" becomes necessary when two Monarchs, that are deceased, share the same year of reign. The current monarch will likely not be match for years. Otr500 ( talk) 10:21, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 00:38, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Although Louis XIV's reign started in 1643, when he was age 5, his personal reign did not begin until 1651, when he was aged 13 years, the so called 'Regency Years." Since QE2 has had single control throughout her entire reign, should that not be at least noted in this article? Taking those facts into consideration, she actually surpassed Louis XIV some 4 years ago in actual length of personal reign. I just think that is worth a mention Frank042316 ( talk).
I have added some of the Kings of Wessex from Egbert. These kings ruled pretty much all of England and were addressed as such (Bretwalda). I struggle with the aligning, I also added Ælfweard of Wessex and tried as best as I can with aligning.
What are your thoughts on the Kings of Wessex being added to the England section? And can someone fix the aligning with the Anglo Saxons I added. MCMax05 ( talk) 15:53, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
I'd suggest that both entries given are pure un-encyclopaedic WP:CRYSTAL and should be removed. Martinevans123 ( talk) 08:18, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Due to recent news there has been a fair amount of vandalism on this article. Should it be Semi Protected? Bagelpigeon ( talk) 18:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of monarchs in Britain by length of reign article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 100 days |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Something's just occured to me - although Elizabeth II is now the longest reigning monarch, she's still not the longest serving queen. This title probably goes to her mother, Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother, who became Queen Consort on 11 December 1936, and retained the title of Queen after the death of her husband until her death on 30 March 2002. This equates to a period of 23850 days (65 years, 109 days). Obviously the Queen Mother shouldn't be in the list as she wasn't a monarch in her own right, but maybe something could be added to the article to mention this?
Incidentally, if my maths is right the present Queen will equal this record on 25 May 2017, if spared. — An optimist on the run! (logged on as Pek the Penguin) 12:05, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
@ Thingg: My problem with the inclusion of these possible future scenarios is that they have nothing to do with the subject of the article: namely, monarchs of Britain and the length of their reigns. OK, so a certain amount of European or World context doesn't hurt, but really saying: if one monarch lives for a certain amount of time AND remains on the throne (which is in no way a certainty after recent abdications in Spain and Netherlands) then they will pass another record; is just over the top. It's like on a pop chart saying if so and so has three more number ones they will hold the record for the most number ones or to take the example you gave, if the sun burns for another 50 billion years it will be the longest lived star in the galaxy. I think we should wait until a record is looming rather than projecting out decades into the future. Btljs ( talk) 11:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Should she still be reigning on –
I'll just leave this here just in case it's ever readded. -- Inops ( talk) 23:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link)
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)
Okay so I have been trying to just include long reigning monarchs within the United Kingdom's history, and Europe as a whole. The 2nd longest ruling of x wouldn't be as noteworthy as the longest ruling of x for example. This being said I don't know where Eleanor would fall into, would she be considered a monarch? I feel that she very narrowly either fits in or misses the scope. Thoughts are welcomed.... - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 13:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
I realize this will not be popular but what is the reason to have the days of reign added to a current Monarch? 1)- Every article using this has to be updated every 24 hours or be outdated. 2)- It is trivial, unimportant, and "only" becomes necessary when two Monarchs, that are deceased, share the same year of reign. The current monarch will likely not be match for years. Otr500 ( talk) 10:21, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 00:38, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Although Louis XIV's reign started in 1643, when he was age 5, his personal reign did not begin until 1651, when he was aged 13 years, the so called 'Regency Years." Since QE2 has had single control throughout her entire reign, should that not be at least noted in this article? Taking those facts into consideration, she actually surpassed Louis XIV some 4 years ago in actual length of personal reign. I just think that is worth a mention Frank042316 ( talk).
I have added some of the Kings of Wessex from Egbert. These kings ruled pretty much all of England and were addressed as such (Bretwalda). I struggle with the aligning, I also added Ælfweard of Wessex and tried as best as I can with aligning.
What are your thoughts on the Kings of Wessex being added to the England section? And can someone fix the aligning with the Anglo Saxons I added. MCMax05 ( talk) 15:53, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
I'd suggest that both entries given are pure un-encyclopaedic WP:CRYSTAL and should be removed. Martinevans123 ( talk) 08:18, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Due to recent news there has been a fair amount of vandalism on this article. Should it be Semi Protected? Bagelpigeon ( talk) 18:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)