Talk:Table of Japanese kanji radicals
There is no entry #35 - Is it an omission ? 82.226.56.38 ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 23:27, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
The meaning given is "line," but ぼう-bō is certainly the stick one throws to a dog in the many many damn books where one has to throw a stick for a dog. DavidLJ ( talk) 13:58, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
The radical 丨 ぼう is listed as a "line" in Kangxi radicals as well which is where the main table came from, but if there was a radical 棒 ぼう then it would be a stick (or a pole or a rod). I imagine, though, that whoever originally called it a vertical "line" was just describing what it looked like, so surely calling it a rod or a stick [1] does the same thing with the added bonus of a relevant reading. A quick Google seems to come up with "line," [2] [3] but my vote's for it to be stick like you said. Uno b4 ( talk) 06:38, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Is 勿 a radical? i can't find it on this table but according to http://jisho.org/kanji/radicals/ its is. Lucia Black ( talk) 07:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
The radical 勹 is listed under number 20 in this Wikipedia article as well. Edit to add: See also: /info/en/?search=Table_of_Japanese_kanji_radicals#Kanji_radicals_not_recognized_by_Kangxi. Where 勿 appears in the table. Verso.Sciolto ( talk) 08:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
The jouyou frequency as listed does not accurately reflect frequencies when the list of jōyō kanji is ordered by radical. For instance, 一 is here within listed as having a jouyou frequency of 50; whereas the ordered list of jōyō kanji provides a count of only 12. Abclemons ( talk) 16:09, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of kanji radicals by stroke count. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:22, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Table of Japanese kanji radicals
There is no entry #35 - Is it an omission ? 82.226.56.38 ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 23:27, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
The meaning given is "line," but ぼう-bō is certainly the stick one throws to a dog in the many many damn books where one has to throw a stick for a dog. DavidLJ ( talk) 13:58, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
The radical 丨 ぼう is listed as a "line" in Kangxi radicals as well which is where the main table came from, but if there was a radical 棒 ぼう then it would be a stick (or a pole or a rod). I imagine, though, that whoever originally called it a vertical "line" was just describing what it looked like, so surely calling it a rod or a stick [1] does the same thing with the added bonus of a relevant reading. A quick Google seems to come up with "line," [2] [3] but my vote's for it to be stick like you said. Uno b4 ( talk) 06:38, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Is 勿 a radical? i can't find it on this table but according to http://jisho.org/kanji/radicals/ its is. Lucia Black ( talk) 07:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
The radical 勹 is listed under number 20 in this Wikipedia article as well. Edit to add: See also: /info/en/?search=Table_of_Japanese_kanji_radicals#Kanji_radicals_not_recognized_by_Kangxi. Where 勿 appears in the table. Verso.Sciolto ( talk) 08:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
The jouyou frequency as listed does not accurately reflect frequencies when the list of jōyō kanji is ordered by radical. For instance, 一 is here within listed as having a jouyou frequency of 50; whereas the ordered list of jōyō kanji provides a count of only 12. Abclemons ( talk) 16:09, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of kanji radicals by stroke count. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:22, 21 May 2017 (UTC)