I added the film, because it was a lack of continuity of the MGM shorts.-- 99.14.105.150 ( talk) 23:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
I do not see either of the Baby Geniuses films here, and those have been very widely panned by critics. It's quite likely that at least the sequel has been called the "worst" movie ever. -- Raddaluigi ( talk) 06:36, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
The current discussion to use a standard other than specific "the worst" wording, started by Burpelson AFB, is above. Please make any comments regarding this suggestion there. Thanks. - SummerPhD ( talk) 14:58, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Now, I am not sure if it can be added because of how recent it is but this film has received massive negative reviews and reception. Film critic Roger Ebert gave the film only half a stare (which is rare for him) and called the movie a visual and actual bore. The ratings for this movie on websites like Amazon and eBay are also very negative with a majority of hundreds of reviews being in the one star area. Entertainment Weekly panned the movie asking "Who is to blame for the last airbender?" Charlie Jane Anders said the plot made little sense and the main character had no personality and acted horribly. It was nominated for 9 Golden Raspberry Awards and won 5 of them. I know it's a stretch but this film should be added in my opinion. I didn't see it and now I'm sure I don't want to. --Wassup!!- D33DeeD33Guy...R.I.P. Dad 06:57, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Time.com called it the worsr epic movie ever. Ivillage talks of it as one of the worst ever/. Additionally, Cole Smithy said in his review ""Battlefield Earth" has a new rival for the title of "worst-film-of-the-last-20-years And stating the obvious it did sweep last years Razzie awards. IamTorgo ( talk) 16:33, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
This movie was added together with Jaws 4 due to 0% on RT. The movie wasn't also a box office failure according with the page of the film. In Italy also grossed more that 5 milion. Also I can't find a source that said "worst movie ever", this movie is bad but can't be stay here; is also still present in the removed films list. Anyone else have any thoughts? This movie can be removed? -- Kekkomereq4 ( talk) 06:58, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Highlander II: The Quickening is #84 at the worst movies ever list at everyones a critc
Time magazine says it hasone of the Worst Movie Sequel Titles ever
Roger Ebert named it one of the worst films of the year in 1991
an article on examiner.com named it hte 5th worst sequal of all time
of course there is the resurrection of Ramirez who died in the first Highlander
msnmovies named Highlander II: The Quickening one of the Worst Movie Sequels of all time
the avclub named it the worst movie sequels that is tenuously related to their predecessors IamTorgo ( talk) 19:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
To be fair, many films on the list now aren't here because they are the worst, they're here because they're the worst of a given genre. Catwoman seems to nominally be riding the dubious honor being the worst superhero movie; ditto for From Justin to Kelly in the musical category. 209.34.51.198 ( talk) 20:56, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
I think that's enough to put it back on the page IamTorgo ( talk) 01:22, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Why does this keep getting removed from the page under the claim of nothing calling it the worst when the above up from Ebert's review has been in it? IamTorgo ( talk) 21:00, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Kekkomereq4, while others have worked to improve the support for this entry, you simply keep removing it. By my count you've done three reverts in the last ~28 hours, so you're coming dangerously close to getting yourself blocked. Please accept the general "consensus minus one" on this issue and move on. This is a highly subjective article, and there's really no changing that at this point. Prebys ( talk) 16:09, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Okay...so I added a discussion here about adding Birdemic: Shock and Terror to this list, which is archived here. Granted, I only got one person to weigh in, but it was a support vote, and I left it up for the month before it was archived. So I added it to the list, since the discussion was apparently now over. Now it's been removed from the list. Did I do something wrong? Do I need to get more votes in support? I'm patient, I'm willing to make a case and do what it takes to get this film on the list... PerryPlanet ( talk) 00:30, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
This movie didn't reach consensus. -- Kekkomereq4 ( talk) 11:42, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breakin%27_2:_Electric_Boogaloo
I feel that this could be included in this listed because it is referenced numerous times when talking about unnecessary and pointless sequels (especially w.r.t. memes) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.212.225.1 ( talk) 14:03, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Now, I am not sure if it can be added because of how recent it is but this film has received massive negative reviews and reception. Film critic Roger Ebert gave the film only half a stare (which is rare for him) and called the movie a visual and actual bore. The ratings for this movie on websites like Amazon and eBay are also very negative with a majority of hundreds of reviews being in the one star area. Entertainment Weekly panned the movie asking "Who is to blame for the last airbender?" Charlie Jane Anders said the plot made little sense and the main character had no personality and acted horribly. It was nominated for 9 Golden Raspberry Awards and won 5 of them. I know it's a stretch but this film should be added in my opinion. I didn't see it and now I'm sure I don't want to. --Wassup!!- D33DeeD33Guy...R.I.P. Dad 06:57, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Time.com called it the worsr epic movie ever. Ivillage talks of it as one of the worst ever/. Additionally, Cole Smithy said in his review ""Battlefield Earth" has a new rival for the title of "worst-film-of-the-last-20-years And stating the obvious it did sweep last years Razzie awards. IamTorgo ( talk) 16:33, 24 April 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.38.128.48 ( talk)
I think Barney's Great Adventure should be included, because it was considered the worst film ever made-- 99.73.188.241 ( talk) 13:59, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Sorry but that films not notable enough for this list, if it is been called one of the worst films ever made you must provide some reliable sources in order to prove so.
Your kidding, right? The film is notable enough because it was based on the uneducational, unpopular show of Barney & Friends. I think Barney should be mention here.-- 99.14.103.55 ( talk) 14:51, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
I belive they should both be re-added. If MST3K films can be, than they should be too. -- 75.74.62.224 ( talk) 17:51, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
Yes, I agree. I belive they should be re-added too. I would also reccomend Mixed Up Zombies and Turkish Star Wars to be on it too. -- MaxRebo120 ( talk) 01:19, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Well, I still say the the current qualifications for the list, that "somebody" has to have called it the worst movie to put it on, are a joke (as many critics as not don't even bother picking a "worst" movie, and movies like Catwoman are making the list for being called "possibly the worst superhero movie" while several movies with undeniably worse overall reception, the very lowest of which wouldn't be hard to determine at all, are left off). However, I do believe that Disaster Movie qualifies, even under the new requirements. Critic Adam Tobias called it "one of the worst films of all time" and added "I just don't see how anyone could not find 'Disaster Movie' one of the worst films of all time" [1]. Dustin Putman called it possibly the worst of the decade (and the year, of corse) [2], and at least twice, [3] [4], critics stated that they were considering creating a new "lowest score" option for the first time to use on this movie. (And I really hope nobody will try to say "they didn't say 'the worst'!" for that last one. They're singling it out as the movie they would score lowest of all. That means it's the worst movie to them.) And of course, it's still a standout for reasons that no longer count in this article, including the fact that it once ranked #1 on internet movie database's bottom 100 list (making it an all time worst for audiences) and is one of the lowest scoring movies on rotten tomatoes (even more so than it was on the "all time worst" list, as movies that ranked ahead of it have recieved a couple positive reviews since then).
I don't intend to look into Alone in the Dark much, especially since more people already seem to be on it, and since it's considered possibly the worst movie from the guy often considered the worst director right now, they probably don't need my help. But it didn't take much to find people at least calling it probably the worst movie of the year, such as critic Betty Jo Tucker [5]. (It was released at the beginning of the year, which is why "probably" was said so much.) 74.111.127.30 ( talk) 23:54, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Does anyone feel that this movie should be mentioned on this list? It was a box-office flop, most critics trashed it upon its release, it has a 10% rank on Rotten Tomatoes, and was profiled in The Fifty Worst Films of All Time book. Not to mention that there is only one film in the 1970s section.
Or, are there any legendary bad films released in the 1970s that we could place in that section? Myra Breckinridge seems all alone. Freshh ( talk) 05:29, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
How about I Spit On Your Grave (1978)? I do believe Siskel, Ebert, and quite a few others were all over it for being an all time worst. 74.111.127.30 ( talk) 20:14, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
i tryed to add son of the mask to the list but it got deleted the next time i checked, that movie has widely been panned by critics and fans and its even on IMDb bottom 100 list, there would be many sources calling it one of the worst films ever made — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trent1994 ( talk • contribs) 22:34, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
i just read some of the requirements for films to be included and they said it needs to be a commercial failure too? i mean, a films commercial success doesn't change a movie from bad to good, like look at batman and robin for example, that movie was commercially successful but it was huge critical failure and it is considered one of the worst superhero films in history, doesnt that prove that any movie can be successful but can still be extremely huge critical failure too? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trent1994 ( talk • contribs) 05:19, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Where do you see "commercial failure" listed as a criterion? - SummerPhD ( talk) 11:51, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
I think Jaws 4 should be mentioned here, because it was panned by critics. -- 99.23.76.5 ( talk) 18:00, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Now, considering how recent this film is im not sure if i could be added. i haven't seen this film but i've heard it has recieved massively universal negative reception and reviews and it swept last years razzies too. here are some sources: Time.com called it the worst epic movie ever. Ivillage talks of it as one of the worst ever. Additionally, Cole Smithy said in his review ""Battlefield Earth" has a new rival for the title of "worst-film-of-the-last-20-years And stating the obvious it did sweep last years Razzie awards. it also has a 6% rating on rotten tomatoes and time magazine had an article about it titled "Who's to Blame for The Last Airbender" where it panned the film in nearly every aspect, particularly M. Night's involvement in the film. Charlie Jane Anders said the plot made little sense and the main character had no personality and acted horribly. it managed to barely bypass its $280 million budget. Film critic Roger Ebert gave the film only half a star (which is rare for him) and called the movie a visual and actual bore and the movie rating on websites like ebay and amazon are really low with many negative comments within the 1 star area. Isn't that enough sources to get this film added? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trent1994 ( talk • contribs) 11:08, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Though not well known this movie got 0% on Rotten Tomatoes and 4.0 on IMDB. It seems to be a British sex comedy that went very wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uanime5 ( talk • contribs) 12:26, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Awhile ago i saw that this film was on the list but it was for some reason removed, why is that? that films been universally panned by critics and audiences alike and many websites and critics have considered it one of the worst films ever made. doesn't anyone aside from me agree that this film should be included on this list? this movies #2 on imdb bottom 100, its 6th of the worst reviewed films of the 2000s on rottentomatoes with a 0% rating on the site, and one such critic said "superbabies has no redeeming qualities". Critic Steve Blance, in his Top Ten Terrible Movie Review, called the movie "the worst I have ever witnessed" and also noted that he would "rather be tortured for twenty-years with searing iron than have to sit through even a minute of this again." plus its was nominated for several razzies in 2004 and it bombed at the box office failing to recoup even half of its budget, isn't that enough proof to get this film re-added? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trent1994 ( talk • contribs) 12:26, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
as i said above, i saw that this film was on the list awhile ago, but it got taken off? why is that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trent1994 ( talk • contribs) 07:12, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Now, out of all the "worst movies" lists' and surveys ive searched up on the web, this movie ive found in at least 80% of those lists. its a film with mariah carey, i think we could consider it being added cos of all the "worst movies" sites ive seen it listed in — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trent1994 ( talk • contribs) 02:20, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
I noticed that Heaven's Gate was removed from this list. However, I definitely think it qualifies to be on here. New York Times called it "an unqualified disaster,". Roger Ebert called it "The most scandalous cinematic waste I have ever seen", and Joe Queenan called it "The worst movie ever made". Readers of Empire Magazine voted it the 6th worst film ever made. The film was so bad that is is widely regarded as having been responsible for destroying Michael Cimino's career. It was nominated for five Raspberry Awards and won the award for "Worst Director". I'd say it's definitely worse than many other films on this list. If this film is not included in this list, then this article is obviously entirely subjective and biased, and should probably just be deleted altogether. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pleo2012 ( talk • contribs) 21:16, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Does anybody belive it should be here?-- 75.74.62.224 ( talk) 22:09, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Another awful movie by Paris Hilton. It got 1.6 on IMDB and on 0% Rotten Tomatoes making it worse than "The Hottie and the Nottie".
A movie based on the Bratz toys. 4 girls are split into different clique by Meredith, then after a year apart they become friends again and vow to take down Meredith. It got 2.6 on IMDB and on 7% Rotten Tomatoes.
The section on Jaws the revenge is rather poorly written. While undoubtedly it belongs here,for reasons outlined in the passage. It could do with a clean up on grammar wording and additional facts, I would attempt such to fix such a matter being knowledgeable on the matter but I feel someone else is capable of sorting out the issue better than I can. Atm the moment it seems as if a child as written the paragraph on the film.
86.172.124.37 ( talk) 22:41, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Why did you get rid of Jaws: The Revenge, when it SHOULD be on there? It's a zero at Rotten tomatoes and everyone hates it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.147.186.187 ( talk) 01:08, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Jaws IV is missing! What happened? Westvoja ( talk) 00:25, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
I removed Mars Needs Moms because
Prebys ( talk) 18:47, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
-- 79.18.83.150 ( talk) 07:31, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
This film is probably the most hated film of our time! It has one five Golden Raspberry Awards and has been universally panned by critics. I has recived an aprroval rating of only 6% and universally hated by the fans of the show Avatar: The Last Airbender. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Westvoja ( talk • contribs) 00:38, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
This film was removed from the article despite being winning a Razzie for both "Worst Picture" (1981) and Wost Picture of the Decade. By the sources, it received some of the worst reviews in history. Please actually read the content before removing it for non-policy reasons.-- Oakshade ( talk) 14:42, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
I've brought up before that there really aren't enough supporting citation for Myra Breckinridge. It's certainly an awful movie, but it doesn't come close to the standards we've set for the other films on the list. The only "worst" reference is Medved's book, and there are over 30 films on his list that don't appear here, so that's really not enough. It's got a surprisingly high 29% at RT (some are "so bad it's good", but some actually compliment the film). I propose that it be removed.
Of course, that would leave no movies from the 70's. Now having lived through 70's cinema, I simply can't accept that :). Prebys ( talk) 15:55, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
I believe that according to Rotten Tomatoes, the film was given a 11% rating, even though it grossed about $133 million out of the $109 million budget.-- I'm a Graduate! ( talk) 19:57, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Chris
Should this film be included in this article "List of films considered the worst"?-- Oakshade ( talk) 21:11, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
If there's a source that lists it and it been used to support other inclusions then this should be a no brainer. -- Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... ( talk) 00:13, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
This RfC has been in place for over 20 days and the discussion seems to have wound down. With 5 participants, 4 are inclined to include this film in the article with 1 still apparently against. Consensus has spoken. I will be closing this RfC and re-adding the film to the article. -- Oakshade ( talk) 06:48, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
this movie HAS been considered one of the worst films by many reliable sources. why isn't it on the list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.182.216.179 ( talk) 10:05, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
I recently saw a news clip about a movie that opened in one theater in Los Angeles, with one viewer, grossing $11 at the box office, and titled The Worst Movie Ever or something like that. Is that too recent to count, or what? 75.73.225.224 ( talk) 01:59, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
I myself think this film should be on here, but I will let others decide.-- 75.74.62.224 ( talk) 21:24, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Didn't know that a film had to be discussed here before suggesting it for the list--so here I am. Surprised that Heaven's Gate was removed (as I now see it was). Consider that it was nominated for five Razzies and won one, has been called the worst by Roger Ebert and Joe Queenan, and virtually ended the existence of a major Hollywood studio. Thoughts? Blueboy 96 11:56, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
":*I agree that between Ebert, Empire and the Guardian, this movie is fitting for inclusion on this site. — Hun ter Ka hn 18:24, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Titanic II, Dragonball: Evolution, The Last Airbender, Bucky Larson, and Megaman are all widely considered to be terrible films. Why are these not mentioned in the article? -- 99.120.152.215 ( talk) 18:38, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Again, cite multiple WP:RS sources that call them "the worst." So far, I haven't even found enough material to qualify They Saved Hitler's Brain.-- Scottandrewhutchins ( talk) 19:01, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
At Long Last Love should be included. It was included in the books The Fifty Worst Films of All Time [29] and Michael Sauter's book The Worst Films of All Time. Esquire film critic John Simon said, "it may be the worst movie musical of this--or any-- decade." [30] The Encyclopedia of American Cinema for Smartphones and Mobile Devices noted it was "panned by critics as one of the worst films ever made." [31] It is also included in The golden turkey awards:nominees and winners, the worst achievements in Hollywood history. [32]. The Buffalo News film critic Jeff Simon wrote, "About 45 minutes in, it became apparent to one and all that this was one of the worst and most embarrassing major-talent turkeys of all time." [33] Film critic Jay Cocks said it's "regarded as the great white elephant catastrophe of its time." [34] Writer and director Peter Bogdanovich sent press releases to newspapers across the country apologizing for this film. [35] -- Oakshade ( talk) 01:24, 17 September 2011 (UTC)\
As it's been a few weeks and only support after discussion began and this follows the letter of guidelines, both broad and those specified by WP:CONLIMITED here, I will be adding this film.-- Oakshade ( talk) 22:58, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
can't believe this isn't on here.-- 98.226.9.223 ( talk) 12:21, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
If this article deals primarily with the worst American films, why not just change the name to "List of American films considered the worst"? Chris ( talk) 22:22, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star. So far, it's been getting a lot of reviews that have been very negative, on par with the "worst ever" comparisons. If there is more of this type of reviewing, especially if it wins a bunch of Razzies, it may qualify for this list. J. Myrle Fuller ( talk) 01:08, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
I just deleted all IMDb user rating scores and all mention of IMDb Bottom 100 since it is based on user scores. We do not add such user submitted scores, only critics certified to review films. However I did leave a link in the external links. — Mike Allen 07:02, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Does anyone think this should be included to the list? It somehow managed to squeeze out a 21% on Rotten Tomatoes, but as far as the most offensive, disastrously produced, and poorly completed films go, Caligula has to be pretty high on that list. I should add that none of those positive reviews were from top critics and Roger Ebert rewarded it no stars in his review, famously ending his review with what the lady in front of him in line at the drinking fountain said... Anyway, let me know your thoughts. Jg2904 ( talk) 01:35, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Why aren't there any mockbusters (such as movies from The Asylum and Video Brinquedo) on this page? Aren't they considered among the worst movies too? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.89.164.78 ( talk) 05:13, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Seriously, I don't know a single person with common sense who likes that movie. BlazeTheMovieFan ( talk) 11:17, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Why aren't Bio-Dome (1996), Baby Geniuses (1999) and Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever (2002) on this list? I think Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever was even on the list at one point, so why was it taken down? Obviously there are a lot more films that should be listed here, but I feel like at least these three should be included. -- Angakoq ( talk) 20:21, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
The 2002 movie Ballistic:Ecks vs Sever needs to be returned to this list. It was taken off several months ago during the massive cleanup. Here are a few reasons why it should be returned. It was a colossal box office flop. It is on Roger Ebert's most hated list, With ebert giving it half a star out of four calling the movie "an ungainly mess, submerged in mayhem, occasionally surfacing for cliches". Guylaine Cadorette of hollywood.com Remarked "Ballistic: Ecks Vs. Sever has to be one of the worst films ever made. Sadly, you almost have to see it to believe it." Various other critics gave it ever more damning reviews; Nick Rogers of state journal-register stated "The backyard battles you staged with your green plastic army men were more exciting and almost certainly made more sense", and Rob Vaux of flipside movie emporium said in his review "You'll have more fun setting fire to yourself in the parking lot. You'll be more entertained getting hit by a bus". Most notably, this movie is also the single worst reviewed movie on rotten tomatoes; 108 critics weighed in, not a single one of them gave it a good review. This earned it the number 1 spot on rotten tomatoes worst of the worst list. The worst of the worst list contains the worst reviewed movies of 2000 to 2009, The includes a few movies that are currently on the 'list of films considered the worst' page (IE Battlefield Earth and Alone In The Dark) and This movie outranked all of them — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.193.9.186 ( talk) 17:44, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
How about this movie...it had been criticized a lot and it gains nothing but Razzie awards. Also Paris Hilton has been criticizes a lot in this badly produced movie. -- Syukri Abd Rahman ( talk) 06:46, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
I added the film, because it was a lack of continuity of the MGM shorts.-- 99.14.105.150 ( talk) 23:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
I do not see either of the Baby Geniuses films here, and those have been very widely panned by critics. It's quite likely that at least the sequel has been called the "worst" movie ever. -- Raddaluigi ( talk) 06:36, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
The current discussion to use a standard other than specific "the worst" wording, started by Burpelson AFB, is above. Please make any comments regarding this suggestion there. Thanks. - SummerPhD ( talk) 14:58, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Now, I am not sure if it can be added because of how recent it is but this film has received massive negative reviews and reception. Film critic Roger Ebert gave the film only half a stare (which is rare for him) and called the movie a visual and actual bore. The ratings for this movie on websites like Amazon and eBay are also very negative with a majority of hundreds of reviews being in the one star area. Entertainment Weekly panned the movie asking "Who is to blame for the last airbender?" Charlie Jane Anders said the plot made little sense and the main character had no personality and acted horribly. It was nominated for 9 Golden Raspberry Awards and won 5 of them. I know it's a stretch but this film should be added in my opinion. I didn't see it and now I'm sure I don't want to. --Wassup!!- D33DeeD33Guy...R.I.P. Dad 06:57, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Time.com called it the worsr epic movie ever. Ivillage talks of it as one of the worst ever/. Additionally, Cole Smithy said in his review ""Battlefield Earth" has a new rival for the title of "worst-film-of-the-last-20-years And stating the obvious it did sweep last years Razzie awards. IamTorgo ( talk) 16:33, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
This movie was added together with Jaws 4 due to 0% on RT. The movie wasn't also a box office failure according with the page of the film. In Italy also grossed more that 5 milion. Also I can't find a source that said "worst movie ever", this movie is bad but can't be stay here; is also still present in the removed films list. Anyone else have any thoughts? This movie can be removed? -- Kekkomereq4 ( talk) 06:58, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Highlander II: The Quickening is #84 at the worst movies ever list at everyones a critc
Time magazine says it hasone of the Worst Movie Sequel Titles ever
Roger Ebert named it one of the worst films of the year in 1991
an article on examiner.com named it hte 5th worst sequal of all time
of course there is the resurrection of Ramirez who died in the first Highlander
msnmovies named Highlander II: The Quickening one of the Worst Movie Sequels of all time
the avclub named it the worst movie sequels that is tenuously related to their predecessors IamTorgo ( talk) 19:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
To be fair, many films on the list now aren't here because they are the worst, they're here because they're the worst of a given genre. Catwoman seems to nominally be riding the dubious honor being the worst superhero movie; ditto for From Justin to Kelly in the musical category. 209.34.51.198 ( talk) 20:56, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
I think that's enough to put it back on the page IamTorgo ( talk) 01:22, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Why does this keep getting removed from the page under the claim of nothing calling it the worst when the above up from Ebert's review has been in it? IamTorgo ( talk) 21:00, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Kekkomereq4, while others have worked to improve the support for this entry, you simply keep removing it. By my count you've done three reverts in the last ~28 hours, so you're coming dangerously close to getting yourself blocked. Please accept the general "consensus minus one" on this issue and move on. This is a highly subjective article, and there's really no changing that at this point. Prebys ( talk) 16:09, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Okay...so I added a discussion here about adding Birdemic: Shock and Terror to this list, which is archived here. Granted, I only got one person to weigh in, but it was a support vote, and I left it up for the month before it was archived. So I added it to the list, since the discussion was apparently now over. Now it's been removed from the list. Did I do something wrong? Do I need to get more votes in support? I'm patient, I'm willing to make a case and do what it takes to get this film on the list... PerryPlanet ( talk) 00:30, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
This movie didn't reach consensus. -- Kekkomereq4 ( talk) 11:42, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breakin%27_2:_Electric_Boogaloo
I feel that this could be included in this listed because it is referenced numerous times when talking about unnecessary and pointless sequels (especially w.r.t. memes) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.212.225.1 ( talk) 14:03, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Now, I am not sure if it can be added because of how recent it is but this film has received massive negative reviews and reception. Film critic Roger Ebert gave the film only half a stare (which is rare for him) and called the movie a visual and actual bore. The ratings for this movie on websites like Amazon and eBay are also very negative with a majority of hundreds of reviews being in the one star area. Entertainment Weekly panned the movie asking "Who is to blame for the last airbender?" Charlie Jane Anders said the plot made little sense and the main character had no personality and acted horribly. It was nominated for 9 Golden Raspberry Awards and won 5 of them. I know it's a stretch but this film should be added in my opinion. I didn't see it and now I'm sure I don't want to. --Wassup!!- D33DeeD33Guy...R.I.P. Dad 06:57, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Time.com called it the worsr epic movie ever. Ivillage talks of it as one of the worst ever/. Additionally, Cole Smithy said in his review ""Battlefield Earth" has a new rival for the title of "worst-film-of-the-last-20-years And stating the obvious it did sweep last years Razzie awards. IamTorgo ( talk) 16:33, 24 April 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.38.128.48 ( talk)
I think Barney's Great Adventure should be included, because it was considered the worst film ever made-- 99.73.188.241 ( talk) 13:59, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Sorry but that films not notable enough for this list, if it is been called one of the worst films ever made you must provide some reliable sources in order to prove so.
Your kidding, right? The film is notable enough because it was based on the uneducational, unpopular show of Barney & Friends. I think Barney should be mention here.-- 99.14.103.55 ( talk) 14:51, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
I belive they should both be re-added. If MST3K films can be, than they should be too. -- 75.74.62.224 ( talk) 17:51, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
Yes, I agree. I belive they should be re-added too. I would also reccomend Mixed Up Zombies and Turkish Star Wars to be on it too. -- MaxRebo120 ( talk) 01:19, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Well, I still say the the current qualifications for the list, that "somebody" has to have called it the worst movie to put it on, are a joke (as many critics as not don't even bother picking a "worst" movie, and movies like Catwoman are making the list for being called "possibly the worst superhero movie" while several movies with undeniably worse overall reception, the very lowest of which wouldn't be hard to determine at all, are left off). However, I do believe that Disaster Movie qualifies, even under the new requirements. Critic Adam Tobias called it "one of the worst films of all time" and added "I just don't see how anyone could not find 'Disaster Movie' one of the worst films of all time" [1]. Dustin Putman called it possibly the worst of the decade (and the year, of corse) [2], and at least twice, [3] [4], critics stated that they were considering creating a new "lowest score" option for the first time to use on this movie. (And I really hope nobody will try to say "they didn't say 'the worst'!" for that last one. They're singling it out as the movie they would score lowest of all. That means it's the worst movie to them.) And of course, it's still a standout for reasons that no longer count in this article, including the fact that it once ranked #1 on internet movie database's bottom 100 list (making it an all time worst for audiences) and is one of the lowest scoring movies on rotten tomatoes (even more so than it was on the "all time worst" list, as movies that ranked ahead of it have recieved a couple positive reviews since then).
I don't intend to look into Alone in the Dark much, especially since more people already seem to be on it, and since it's considered possibly the worst movie from the guy often considered the worst director right now, they probably don't need my help. But it didn't take much to find people at least calling it probably the worst movie of the year, such as critic Betty Jo Tucker [5]. (It was released at the beginning of the year, which is why "probably" was said so much.) 74.111.127.30 ( talk) 23:54, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Does anyone feel that this movie should be mentioned on this list? It was a box-office flop, most critics trashed it upon its release, it has a 10% rank on Rotten Tomatoes, and was profiled in The Fifty Worst Films of All Time book. Not to mention that there is only one film in the 1970s section.
Or, are there any legendary bad films released in the 1970s that we could place in that section? Myra Breckinridge seems all alone. Freshh ( talk) 05:29, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
How about I Spit On Your Grave (1978)? I do believe Siskel, Ebert, and quite a few others were all over it for being an all time worst. 74.111.127.30 ( talk) 20:14, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
i tryed to add son of the mask to the list but it got deleted the next time i checked, that movie has widely been panned by critics and fans and its even on IMDb bottom 100 list, there would be many sources calling it one of the worst films ever made — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trent1994 ( talk • contribs) 22:34, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
i just read some of the requirements for films to be included and they said it needs to be a commercial failure too? i mean, a films commercial success doesn't change a movie from bad to good, like look at batman and robin for example, that movie was commercially successful but it was huge critical failure and it is considered one of the worst superhero films in history, doesnt that prove that any movie can be successful but can still be extremely huge critical failure too? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trent1994 ( talk • contribs) 05:19, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Where do you see "commercial failure" listed as a criterion? - SummerPhD ( talk) 11:51, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
I think Jaws 4 should be mentioned here, because it was panned by critics. -- 99.23.76.5 ( talk) 18:00, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Now, considering how recent this film is im not sure if i could be added. i haven't seen this film but i've heard it has recieved massively universal negative reception and reviews and it swept last years razzies too. here are some sources: Time.com called it the worst epic movie ever. Ivillage talks of it as one of the worst ever. Additionally, Cole Smithy said in his review ""Battlefield Earth" has a new rival for the title of "worst-film-of-the-last-20-years And stating the obvious it did sweep last years Razzie awards. it also has a 6% rating on rotten tomatoes and time magazine had an article about it titled "Who's to Blame for The Last Airbender" where it panned the film in nearly every aspect, particularly M. Night's involvement in the film. Charlie Jane Anders said the plot made little sense and the main character had no personality and acted horribly. it managed to barely bypass its $280 million budget. Film critic Roger Ebert gave the film only half a star (which is rare for him) and called the movie a visual and actual bore and the movie rating on websites like ebay and amazon are really low with many negative comments within the 1 star area. Isn't that enough sources to get this film added? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trent1994 ( talk • contribs) 11:08, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Though not well known this movie got 0% on Rotten Tomatoes and 4.0 on IMDB. It seems to be a British sex comedy that went very wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uanime5 ( talk • contribs) 12:26, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Awhile ago i saw that this film was on the list but it was for some reason removed, why is that? that films been universally panned by critics and audiences alike and many websites and critics have considered it one of the worst films ever made. doesn't anyone aside from me agree that this film should be included on this list? this movies #2 on imdb bottom 100, its 6th of the worst reviewed films of the 2000s on rottentomatoes with a 0% rating on the site, and one such critic said "superbabies has no redeeming qualities". Critic Steve Blance, in his Top Ten Terrible Movie Review, called the movie "the worst I have ever witnessed" and also noted that he would "rather be tortured for twenty-years with searing iron than have to sit through even a minute of this again." plus its was nominated for several razzies in 2004 and it bombed at the box office failing to recoup even half of its budget, isn't that enough proof to get this film re-added? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trent1994 ( talk • contribs) 12:26, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
as i said above, i saw that this film was on the list awhile ago, but it got taken off? why is that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trent1994 ( talk • contribs) 07:12, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Now, out of all the "worst movies" lists' and surveys ive searched up on the web, this movie ive found in at least 80% of those lists. its a film with mariah carey, i think we could consider it being added cos of all the "worst movies" sites ive seen it listed in — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trent1994 ( talk • contribs) 02:20, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
I noticed that Heaven's Gate was removed from this list. However, I definitely think it qualifies to be on here. New York Times called it "an unqualified disaster,". Roger Ebert called it "The most scandalous cinematic waste I have ever seen", and Joe Queenan called it "The worst movie ever made". Readers of Empire Magazine voted it the 6th worst film ever made. The film was so bad that is is widely regarded as having been responsible for destroying Michael Cimino's career. It was nominated for five Raspberry Awards and won the award for "Worst Director". I'd say it's definitely worse than many other films on this list. If this film is not included in this list, then this article is obviously entirely subjective and biased, and should probably just be deleted altogether. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pleo2012 ( talk • contribs) 21:16, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Does anybody belive it should be here?-- 75.74.62.224 ( talk) 22:09, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Another awful movie by Paris Hilton. It got 1.6 on IMDB and on 0% Rotten Tomatoes making it worse than "The Hottie and the Nottie".
A movie based on the Bratz toys. 4 girls are split into different clique by Meredith, then after a year apart they become friends again and vow to take down Meredith. It got 2.6 on IMDB and on 7% Rotten Tomatoes.
The section on Jaws the revenge is rather poorly written. While undoubtedly it belongs here,for reasons outlined in the passage. It could do with a clean up on grammar wording and additional facts, I would attempt such to fix such a matter being knowledgeable on the matter but I feel someone else is capable of sorting out the issue better than I can. Atm the moment it seems as if a child as written the paragraph on the film.
86.172.124.37 ( talk) 22:41, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Why did you get rid of Jaws: The Revenge, when it SHOULD be on there? It's a zero at Rotten tomatoes and everyone hates it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.147.186.187 ( talk) 01:08, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Jaws IV is missing! What happened? Westvoja ( talk) 00:25, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
I removed Mars Needs Moms because
Prebys ( talk) 18:47, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
-- 79.18.83.150 ( talk) 07:31, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
This film is probably the most hated film of our time! It has one five Golden Raspberry Awards and has been universally panned by critics. I has recived an aprroval rating of only 6% and universally hated by the fans of the show Avatar: The Last Airbender. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Westvoja ( talk • contribs) 00:38, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
This film was removed from the article despite being winning a Razzie for both "Worst Picture" (1981) and Wost Picture of the Decade. By the sources, it received some of the worst reviews in history. Please actually read the content before removing it for non-policy reasons.-- Oakshade ( talk) 14:42, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
I've brought up before that there really aren't enough supporting citation for Myra Breckinridge. It's certainly an awful movie, but it doesn't come close to the standards we've set for the other films on the list. The only "worst" reference is Medved's book, and there are over 30 films on his list that don't appear here, so that's really not enough. It's got a surprisingly high 29% at RT (some are "so bad it's good", but some actually compliment the film). I propose that it be removed.
Of course, that would leave no movies from the 70's. Now having lived through 70's cinema, I simply can't accept that :). Prebys ( talk) 15:55, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
I believe that according to Rotten Tomatoes, the film was given a 11% rating, even though it grossed about $133 million out of the $109 million budget.-- I'm a Graduate! ( talk) 19:57, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Chris
Should this film be included in this article "List of films considered the worst"?-- Oakshade ( talk) 21:11, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
If there's a source that lists it and it been used to support other inclusions then this should be a no brainer. -- Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... ( talk) 00:13, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
This RfC has been in place for over 20 days and the discussion seems to have wound down. With 5 participants, 4 are inclined to include this film in the article with 1 still apparently against. Consensus has spoken. I will be closing this RfC and re-adding the film to the article. -- Oakshade ( talk) 06:48, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
this movie HAS been considered one of the worst films by many reliable sources. why isn't it on the list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.182.216.179 ( talk) 10:05, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
I recently saw a news clip about a movie that opened in one theater in Los Angeles, with one viewer, grossing $11 at the box office, and titled The Worst Movie Ever or something like that. Is that too recent to count, or what? 75.73.225.224 ( talk) 01:59, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
I myself think this film should be on here, but I will let others decide.-- 75.74.62.224 ( talk) 21:24, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Didn't know that a film had to be discussed here before suggesting it for the list--so here I am. Surprised that Heaven's Gate was removed (as I now see it was). Consider that it was nominated for five Razzies and won one, has been called the worst by Roger Ebert and Joe Queenan, and virtually ended the existence of a major Hollywood studio. Thoughts? Blueboy 96 11:56, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
":*I agree that between Ebert, Empire and the Guardian, this movie is fitting for inclusion on this site. — Hun ter Ka hn 18:24, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Titanic II, Dragonball: Evolution, The Last Airbender, Bucky Larson, and Megaman are all widely considered to be terrible films. Why are these not mentioned in the article? -- 99.120.152.215 ( talk) 18:38, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Again, cite multiple WP:RS sources that call them "the worst." So far, I haven't even found enough material to qualify They Saved Hitler's Brain.-- Scottandrewhutchins ( talk) 19:01, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
At Long Last Love should be included. It was included in the books The Fifty Worst Films of All Time [29] and Michael Sauter's book The Worst Films of All Time. Esquire film critic John Simon said, "it may be the worst movie musical of this--or any-- decade." [30] The Encyclopedia of American Cinema for Smartphones and Mobile Devices noted it was "panned by critics as one of the worst films ever made." [31] It is also included in The golden turkey awards:nominees and winners, the worst achievements in Hollywood history. [32]. The Buffalo News film critic Jeff Simon wrote, "About 45 minutes in, it became apparent to one and all that this was one of the worst and most embarrassing major-talent turkeys of all time." [33] Film critic Jay Cocks said it's "regarded as the great white elephant catastrophe of its time." [34] Writer and director Peter Bogdanovich sent press releases to newspapers across the country apologizing for this film. [35] -- Oakshade ( talk) 01:24, 17 September 2011 (UTC)\
As it's been a few weeks and only support after discussion began and this follows the letter of guidelines, both broad and those specified by WP:CONLIMITED here, I will be adding this film.-- Oakshade ( talk) 22:58, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
can't believe this isn't on here.-- 98.226.9.223 ( talk) 12:21, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
If this article deals primarily with the worst American films, why not just change the name to "List of American films considered the worst"? Chris ( talk) 22:22, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star. So far, it's been getting a lot of reviews that have been very negative, on par with the "worst ever" comparisons. If there is more of this type of reviewing, especially if it wins a bunch of Razzies, it may qualify for this list. J. Myrle Fuller ( talk) 01:08, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
I just deleted all IMDb user rating scores and all mention of IMDb Bottom 100 since it is based on user scores. We do not add such user submitted scores, only critics certified to review films. However I did leave a link in the external links. — Mike Allen 07:02, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Does anyone think this should be included to the list? It somehow managed to squeeze out a 21% on Rotten Tomatoes, but as far as the most offensive, disastrously produced, and poorly completed films go, Caligula has to be pretty high on that list. I should add that none of those positive reviews were from top critics and Roger Ebert rewarded it no stars in his review, famously ending his review with what the lady in front of him in line at the drinking fountain said... Anyway, let me know your thoughts. Jg2904 ( talk) 01:35, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Why aren't there any mockbusters (such as movies from The Asylum and Video Brinquedo) on this page? Aren't they considered among the worst movies too? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.89.164.78 ( talk) 05:13, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Seriously, I don't know a single person with common sense who likes that movie. BlazeTheMovieFan ( talk) 11:17, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Why aren't Bio-Dome (1996), Baby Geniuses (1999) and Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever (2002) on this list? I think Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever was even on the list at one point, so why was it taken down? Obviously there are a lot more films that should be listed here, but I feel like at least these three should be included. -- Angakoq ( talk) 20:21, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
The 2002 movie Ballistic:Ecks vs Sever needs to be returned to this list. It was taken off several months ago during the massive cleanup. Here are a few reasons why it should be returned. It was a colossal box office flop. It is on Roger Ebert's most hated list, With ebert giving it half a star out of four calling the movie "an ungainly mess, submerged in mayhem, occasionally surfacing for cliches". Guylaine Cadorette of hollywood.com Remarked "Ballistic: Ecks Vs. Sever has to be one of the worst films ever made. Sadly, you almost have to see it to believe it." Various other critics gave it ever more damning reviews; Nick Rogers of state journal-register stated "The backyard battles you staged with your green plastic army men were more exciting and almost certainly made more sense", and Rob Vaux of flipside movie emporium said in his review "You'll have more fun setting fire to yourself in the parking lot. You'll be more entertained getting hit by a bus". Most notably, this movie is also the single worst reviewed movie on rotten tomatoes; 108 critics weighed in, not a single one of them gave it a good review. This earned it the number 1 spot on rotten tomatoes worst of the worst list. The worst of the worst list contains the worst reviewed movies of 2000 to 2009, The includes a few movies that are currently on the 'list of films considered the worst' page (IE Battlefield Earth and Alone In The Dark) and This movie outranked all of them — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.193.9.186 ( talk) 17:44, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
How about this movie...it had been criticized a lot and it gains nothing but Razzie awards. Also Paris Hilton has been criticizes a lot in this badly produced movie. -- Syukri Abd Rahman ( talk) 06:46, 26 November 2011 (UTC)