This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This
WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Popular culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Popular cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular cultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular culturePopular culture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all
LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the
project page or contribute to the
discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
This article was created or improved during
Wiki Loves Pride,
2016,
2023 and
2024.Wiki Loves PrideWikipedia:Wiki Loves PrideTemplate:Wiki Loves Pride talkWiki Loves Pride articles
This article seems appropriate for WikiProject LGBT studies, but not necessarily an LGBT-related category. One can be LGBT or polyamorous, or both, or neither. ---
Another Believer(
Talk)23:34, 20 June 2016 (UTC)reply
I believe it is appropriate for LGBT studies, if Polyamory can be part of LGBT relationships, then it should be included LGBT studies. I added the WikiProject back.
Demt1298 (
talk)
18:27, 26 April 2022 (UTC)reply
No mention of Heinlein's stories in literature?
At a minimum, Time Enough for Love and The Number of the Beast have a poly family as central characters, and poly families are the default in Lunar society in The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.
Philculmer (
talk)
10:50, 17 May 2022 (UTC)reply
If there are reliable sources for it, then feel free to add sources for it. I say that because with many of the list pages, especially LGBTQ ones, people are always trying to add in entries with bad or poor sourcing, which is frustrating.
Historyday01 (
talk)
13:12, 17 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Polyamory and Polyagamy are in fact different so the Instances of Polygamy should be removed
from this Article trying to list Polyamory. Can someone do this and remove at least
Honestly, I do think there should be more entries, but there need to be reliable sources to support those entries. There have to be more poly characters than this. Maybe some of those entries I listed back in 2021 under "
Entries removed which need better sourcing" section can be verified with reliable sources.
Historyday01 (
talk)
01:29, 3 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Polyamory and Polygamy are in fact different so the Instances of Polygamy should be removed from this Article trying to list Polyamory.
Can someone do this and remove at least
the Anime Character Uzui? We're already stretching it probably too far with the 'just mentioned' Instances,
In season 3 episode 7, The Deep mentions wanting another partner join the relationship, and then they briefly try that. Should we include this in the article? -
Mati_Roy
@
User:Mati Roy, if there is a reliable source about that scene in
The Deep (is this the series you mean?), then it surely should be included in the article. The more entries with reliable sources on this page, the better. --
Historyday01 (
talk)
01:25, 3 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Polyamory is not generally considered LGBT because it's not a sexuality, gender, or romantic orientation. LGBT is defined as the community for anyone who is not straight, not cisgender, not allosexual (asexual), and not alloromantic (aromantic). So the LGBT portal bar should be taken off.
DarknessGoth777 (
talk)
16:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC)reply
I disagree. It deserves to be within the LGBT project. This was already discussed before and there was consensus to maintain the page within the project, even though it is "not necessarily an LGBT-related category [as] one can be LGBT or polyamorous, or both, or neither." It IS appropriate. No need to have a discussion like this again. Your edits like
this are NOT helpful either. If anything, this page should be expanded not weakened.
Historyday01 (
talk)
17:22, 22 August 2023 (UTC)reply
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This
WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Popular culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Popular cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular cultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular culturePopular culture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all
LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the
project page or contribute to the
discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
This article was created or improved during
Wiki Loves Pride,
2016,
2023 and
2024.Wiki Loves PrideWikipedia:Wiki Loves PrideTemplate:Wiki Loves Pride talkWiki Loves Pride articles
This article seems appropriate for WikiProject LGBT studies, but not necessarily an LGBT-related category. One can be LGBT or polyamorous, or both, or neither. ---
Another Believer(
Talk)23:34, 20 June 2016 (UTC)reply
I believe it is appropriate for LGBT studies, if Polyamory can be part of LGBT relationships, then it should be included LGBT studies. I added the WikiProject back.
Demt1298 (
talk)
18:27, 26 April 2022 (UTC)reply
No mention of Heinlein's stories in literature?
At a minimum, Time Enough for Love and The Number of the Beast have a poly family as central characters, and poly families are the default in Lunar society in The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.
Philculmer (
talk)
10:50, 17 May 2022 (UTC)reply
If there are reliable sources for it, then feel free to add sources for it. I say that because with many of the list pages, especially LGBTQ ones, people are always trying to add in entries with bad or poor sourcing, which is frustrating.
Historyday01 (
talk)
13:12, 17 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Polyamory and Polyagamy are in fact different so the Instances of Polygamy should be removed
from this Article trying to list Polyamory. Can someone do this and remove at least
Honestly, I do think there should be more entries, but there need to be reliable sources to support those entries. There have to be more poly characters than this. Maybe some of those entries I listed back in 2021 under "
Entries removed which need better sourcing" section can be verified with reliable sources.
Historyday01 (
talk)
01:29, 3 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Polyamory and Polygamy are in fact different so the Instances of Polygamy should be removed from this Article trying to list Polyamory.
Can someone do this and remove at least
the Anime Character Uzui? We're already stretching it probably too far with the 'just mentioned' Instances,
In season 3 episode 7, The Deep mentions wanting another partner join the relationship, and then they briefly try that. Should we include this in the article? -
Mati_Roy
@
User:Mati Roy, if there is a reliable source about that scene in
The Deep (is this the series you mean?), then it surely should be included in the article. The more entries with reliable sources on this page, the better. --
Historyday01 (
talk)
01:25, 3 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Polyamory is not generally considered LGBT because it's not a sexuality, gender, or romantic orientation. LGBT is defined as the community for anyone who is not straight, not cisgender, not allosexual (asexual), and not alloromantic (aromantic). So the LGBT portal bar should be taken off.
DarknessGoth777 (
talk)
16:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC)reply
I disagree. It deserves to be within the LGBT project. This was already discussed before and there was consensus to maintain the page within the project, even though it is "not necessarily an LGBT-related category [as] one can be LGBT or polyamorous, or both, or neither." It IS appropriate. No need to have a discussion like this again. Your edits like
this are NOT helpful either. If anything, this page should be expanded not weakened.
Historyday01 (
talk)
17:22, 22 August 2023 (UTC)reply