This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
What definition of Collectible Card Games makes you so sure that PSM isn't a CCG? Wouter Lievens 09:25, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
The reason this is not a CCG is because this is a miniatures game. The game is played with miniatures. They are stored on cards, but the cards themselves hove no game value other than reference. Therefore, the game is no played with cards; it is not a CCG.
This is a role-playing game that uses cards extensively, but is not a collectible card game. The players make a big deal about that. -- Netoholic @ 07:21, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
Sounds a lot like a technicality or politics, but it is not a CCG as defined by the definition of a collectible card game, correct?
No source information, I can find nothing about it. -- Netoholic @ 07:21, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, these are card games, but non-collectible (sold as a set). -- Netoholic @ 07:44, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
Final Fantasy VIII is packaged in boosters of 10 cards each. Cards are numbered for collectibility. Final Fantasy VIII is not sold as a set, but Final Fantasy IX is.
Players draw off a shared deck of cards. -- Netoholic @ 07:44, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
This does not invalidate this game as being a CCG under the definition of a collectible card game. Nowhere in the definition does it say players have different decks. The game is packaged as a CCG, and is collectible in the same manner. Therefore, this should be a CCG by the current definition.
Mechanically not much like a CCG. Steve Jackson Games got a lot of ears talking about how this was out before Magic, but may be a bit of historical revisionism? Here is a gameplay description]. -- Netoholic @ 07:44, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
Someone's personal programming project. -- Netoholic @ 20:17, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Not a notable commercial release. -- Netoholic @ 20:17, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Shared deck, no more a CCG than UNO. -- Netoholic @ 20:17, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Need a source for the game rules, but likely a fantasy baseball variant. -- Netoholic @ 20:17, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Need a source for the game rules, but likely a fantasy football variant. -- Netoholic @ 10:07, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Mystick is a Customizable game, but comes in two set decks that you can mix. No collectibility on this game at all. -- Century
http://www.wuxiapian.com/ and http://www.animalherders.com/ links to some crap instead of actual CCG. spam?
This game does not appear to ever have been published in English. Siliconcrusader ( talk) 05:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
| Alteil ||2004||?||No |-
Alteil is a DCCG -- Squeezums ( talk) 17:48, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
I'm not sure if they're close enough to put on the list, but the following games are based at least partially on mechanics that closely resemble CCGs:
69.85.162.195 21:52, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
There are only three games listed there, but there are still far far more in production, actively supporting and actively played, unless of course there are some set guidelines detailing exactly what "actively" means, but I do not see these anywhere on the page -- so, what exactly is an "actively supported" CCG? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Josh7289 ( talk • contribs) 00:32, 19 March 2007 (UTC).
Is there a known page for the "Garbage Pale Kids" collection? If so, why is it not on the list? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.1.28.249 ( talk) 21:14, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
there was also a not well known bobobo trading card game.I'll have a source up soon.
I added an alphabetical listing. I know nothing about Trading Card Games. My seven year old boy is interested, and I am trying to learn. The essential purpose of Wikipedia is to imform the ignorant. Those of us ignorant about Treding Card Games need an alphabetical listing, as the only thing we are likely to know is the name of the game.
Is there something about these games that invalidates my thinking? Nwbeeson 14:12, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Please note that there are two accepted spellings of this word and different companies have used different spellings. Please leave them as they are. -- Century 23:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
What about those Trading Card Games what hasn't been released in USA? -- Szente ( talk) 21:30, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Wouldn't it be better to have the list of CCGs in a user-sortable table? This would remove the redundancy of having seperate alphabetical and date-sorted sections, and would make it easier to access the information. Thomasdav26 ( talk) 20:21, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
If no one objects, I'm going to resort the T section. Most the titles starting with "The" such as "The X-Files" should be relisted in their proper section, such a X for The X-Files. The new listing for the X-Files would read: "X-Files, The." When sorting alphabetically and the first word is "the" you should always alphabetize by the second word. Leitmotiv ( talk) 06:03, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Should this list include games which have only been available in a foreign language or only games which are/were published in English? -- Siliconcrusader ( talk) 05:13, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on List of collectible card games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:27, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
The article says to see the section near the bottom, but I can’t find the section described. Papí • talk 06:23, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on List of collectible card games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:22, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on List of collectible card games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
The references for this game are very week with the only non-wiki reference being the Scrye checklist. The description of the game seems to imply that the game is played with a shared deck rather than each player having their own deck. This deck does seems to be modified by blind booster packs, and the article does call the game a CCG so it may still qualify as a CCG. I'm not certain on the exact line drawn to define a CCG. -- Squeezums ( talk) 17:14, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
The introduction of the page states "Unless otherwise noted, all dates listed should be considered as the North American release date.". Hatalom Kártyái Kártyajáték and Kiválasztottak shows both of it's original Hungarian release, not the North American, I doubt any of them were released in NA to begin with. I've found an English site for HKK, but it was noted due to the massive amount of texts extensive translation is needed to become playable. I haven't found anything about an English version of M*K, and their webshop doesn't deliver outside Hungary at the moment, altough a week ago they noted they are planning EU distribution on their distributor's Facebook. That's why I added the "?" behind the release date, like some of the others have. 85.67.241.26 ( talk) 07:39, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
The Robotech CCG's publisher links to the Lego theme of the same name, not the page for the actual company. Any idea on how to solve this? (sorry, I'm new here.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.35.76.5 ( talk) 18:52, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
there needs to be a section dedicated to worldwide sales. Obviously, Magic or Pokemon are going to be #1, but it would still be helpful, since a google search only shows you ranks based on the site's opinion. 2601:346:C201:60C0:B5F2:DF40:9BD3:BCF2 ( talk) 23:26, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
What definition of Collectible Card Games makes you so sure that PSM isn't a CCG? Wouter Lievens 09:25, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
The reason this is not a CCG is because this is a miniatures game. The game is played with miniatures. They are stored on cards, but the cards themselves hove no game value other than reference. Therefore, the game is no played with cards; it is not a CCG.
This is a role-playing game that uses cards extensively, but is not a collectible card game. The players make a big deal about that. -- Netoholic @ 07:21, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
Sounds a lot like a technicality or politics, but it is not a CCG as defined by the definition of a collectible card game, correct?
No source information, I can find nothing about it. -- Netoholic @ 07:21, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, these are card games, but non-collectible (sold as a set). -- Netoholic @ 07:44, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
Final Fantasy VIII is packaged in boosters of 10 cards each. Cards are numbered for collectibility. Final Fantasy VIII is not sold as a set, but Final Fantasy IX is.
Players draw off a shared deck of cards. -- Netoholic @ 07:44, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
This does not invalidate this game as being a CCG under the definition of a collectible card game. Nowhere in the definition does it say players have different decks. The game is packaged as a CCG, and is collectible in the same manner. Therefore, this should be a CCG by the current definition.
Mechanically not much like a CCG. Steve Jackson Games got a lot of ears talking about how this was out before Magic, but may be a bit of historical revisionism? Here is a gameplay description]. -- Netoholic @ 07:44, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
Someone's personal programming project. -- Netoholic @ 20:17, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Not a notable commercial release. -- Netoholic @ 20:17, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Shared deck, no more a CCG than UNO. -- Netoholic @ 20:17, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Need a source for the game rules, but likely a fantasy baseball variant. -- Netoholic @ 20:17, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Need a source for the game rules, but likely a fantasy football variant. -- Netoholic @ 10:07, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Mystick is a Customizable game, but comes in two set decks that you can mix. No collectibility on this game at all. -- Century
http://www.wuxiapian.com/ and http://www.animalherders.com/ links to some crap instead of actual CCG. spam?
This game does not appear to ever have been published in English. Siliconcrusader ( talk) 05:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
| Alteil ||2004||?||No |-
Alteil is a DCCG -- Squeezums ( talk) 17:48, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
I'm not sure if they're close enough to put on the list, but the following games are based at least partially on mechanics that closely resemble CCGs:
69.85.162.195 21:52, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
There are only three games listed there, but there are still far far more in production, actively supporting and actively played, unless of course there are some set guidelines detailing exactly what "actively" means, but I do not see these anywhere on the page -- so, what exactly is an "actively supported" CCG? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Josh7289 ( talk • contribs) 00:32, 19 March 2007 (UTC).
Is there a known page for the "Garbage Pale Kids" collection? If so, why is it not on the list? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.1.28.249 ( talk) 21:14, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
there was also a not well known bobobo trading card game.I'll have a source up soon.
I added an alphabetical listing. I know nothing about Trading Card Games. My seven year old boy is interested, and I am trying to learn. The essential purpose of Wikipedia is to imform the ignorant. Those of us ignorant about Treding Card Games need an alphabetical listing, as the only thing we are likely to know is the name of the game.
Is there something about these games that invalidates my thinking? Nwbeeson 14:12, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Please note that there are two accepted spellings of this word and different companies have used different spellings. Please leave them as they are. -- Century 23:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
What about those Trading Card Games what hasn't been released in USA? -- Szente ( talk) 21:30, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Wouldn't it be better to have the list of CCGs in a user-sortable table? This would remove the redundancy of having seperate alphabetical and date-sorted sections, and would make it easier to access the information. Thomasdav26 ( talk) 20:21, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
If no one objects, I'm going to resort the T section. Most the titles starting with "The" such as "The X-Files" should be relisted in their proper section, such a X for The X-Files. The new listing for the X-Files would read: "X-Files, The." When sorting alphabetically and the first word is "the" you should always alphabetize by the second word. Leitmotiv ( talk) 06:03, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Should this list include games which have only been available in a foreign language or only games which are/were published in English? -- Siliconcrusader ( talk) 05:13, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on List of collectible card games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:27, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
The article says to see the section near the bottom, but I can’t find the section described. Papí • talk 06:23, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on List of collectible card games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:22, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on List of collectible card games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
The references for this game are very week with the only non-wiki reference being the Scrye checklist. The description of the game seems to imply that the game is played with a shared deck rather than each player having their own deck. This deck does seems to be modified by blind booster packs, and the article does call the game a CCG so it may still qualify as a CCG. I'm not certain on the exact line drawn to define a CCG. -- Squeezums ( talk) 17:14, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
The introduction of the page states "Unless otherwise noted, all dates listed should be considered as the North American release date.". Hatalom Kártyái Kártyajáték and Kiválasztottak shows both of it's original Hungarian release, not the North American, I doubt any of them were released in NA to begin with. I've found an English site for HKK, but it was noted due to the massive amount of texts extensive translation is needed to become playable. I haven't found anything about an English version of M*K, and their webshop doesn't deliver outside Hungary at the moment, altough a week ago they noted they are planning EU distribution on their distributor's Facebook. That's why I added the "?" behind the release date, like some of the others have. 85.67.241.26 ( talk) 07:39, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
The Robotech CCG's publisher links to the Lego theme of the same name, not the page for the actual company. Any idea on how to solve this? (sorry, I'm new here.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.35.76.5 ( talk) 18:52, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
there needs to be a section dedicated to worldwide sales. Obviously, Magic or Pokemon are going to be #1, but it would still be helpful, since a google search only shows you ranks based on the site's opinion. 2601:346:C201:60C0:B5F2:DF40:9BD3:BCF2 ( talk) 23:26, 10 July 2021 (UTC)