|
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
There are ravens and hawks in the Fire Emblem games. They are referred to as laguz though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.170.197.10 ( talk) 18:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Can anyone find any pictures from mythology of bird people? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zillakilla ( talk • contribs) 23:02, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Who, apart from Wikipedia and a few science fiction stories, calls these things "avian humanoids"? Pretty much everyone calls them some variation of "bird people" or "birdmen". This title seems like an unnecessary formalism. Uncle G ( talk) 12:23, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Descriptions and depictions of angels with wings are a post-biblical phenomenon. They are not so described in either the Old or the New Testament. Winged heavenly beings are designated as cherubim or seraphim, are not exclusively humanoid, and are never called "angels". I don't know if the Quran describes angels as winged or if any Jewish post-biblical religious literature or art does so. Koro Neil ( talk) 01:35, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Maybe just me, but I am not clear what the point of this article is and how it in any way satisfies WP:NOTE. The article has very few references and none tie together the random items listed here. I could just as easily create articles like "Things that are red" or "Cars that have unusual have funny headlights" but that those would not have merit either.
-- MC 141.131.2.3 ( talk) 19:41, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Nazca mummies research show those humanoids with eggs are real. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxvcoK1_HoA Bohumir Zamecnik ( talk) 18:55, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
|
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
There are ravens and hawks in the Fire Emblem games. They are referred to as laguz though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.170.197.10 ( talk) 18:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Can anyone find any pictures from mythology of bird people? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zillakilla ( talk • contribs) 23:02, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Who, apart from Wikipedia and a few science fiction stories, calls these things "avian humanoids"? Pretty much everyone calls them some variation of "bird people" or "birdmen". This title seems like an unnecessary formalism. Uncle G ( talk) 12:23, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Descriptions and depictions of angels with wings are a post-biblical phenomenon. They are not so described in either the Old or the New Testament. Winged heavenly beings are designated as cherubim or seraphim, are not exclusively humanoid, and are never called "angels". I don't know if the Quran describes angels as winged or if any Jewish post-biblical religious literature or art does so. Koro Neil ( talk) 01:35, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Maybe just me, but I am not clear what the point of this article is and how it in any way satisfies WP:NOTE. The article has very few references and none tie together the random items listed here. I could just as easily create articles like "Things that are red" or "Cars that have unusual have funny headlights" but that those would not have merit either.
-- MC 141.131.2.3 ( talk) 19:41, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Nazca mummies research show those humanoids with eggs are real. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxvcoK1_HoA Bohumir Zamecnik ( talk) 18:55, 3 July 2024 (UTC)