![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I playing on moving this page in 48H if there any last changes go ahead and make it. Fanoflionking 12:35, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
This is an unnecessary WP:CONTENTFORK of List of films by box office admissions with a slightly more narrow scope. I propose redirecting this to the main topic. I did so WP:BOLDLY some time ago, and it was reverted with the rationale "Not without discussing first", so I'm formally suggesting it here. TompaDompa ( talk) 19:21, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
WP:RELART. Of course, that's not what a related article is. The scope of this article is a proper subset of the scope of List of films by box office admissions. This is just an arbitrary (thinner) slicing of the data, and Wikipedia is not a box office database. TompaDompa ( talk) 17:38, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Since when you became the only man who can decide if movies' datas should be put or not in Wikipedia? The article of box office admissions for animated films is needed because there are very few of them that can be included in List of films by box office admissions. It was not about Wikipedia being box office database or not. It was about removing the whole data of this article entirely without any discussions (and there are several users who disagree with you). It can be considered a related article WP:RELART because both articles related but different topics (animation). This does not make either of the two articles a content fork. Further, in encyclopedias it is perfectly proper to have separate articles for each different definition of a term; unlike dictionaries, a single encyclopedia article covers a topic, not a term. NextEditor123 ( talk) 18:10, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
related but differenttopic but a subtopic of films. That makes this a WP:CONTENTFORK. You have arbitrarily decided to slice the data this way, with no justification presented why this subtopic should warrant a separate article—do the sources rank animated films by box office admissions with these divisions into traditional, computer, and stop-motion animated films? If not, assembling the data like this is producing novel content—which is of course not allowed per Wikipedia policy. You can't just trawl the sources for the data that would be needed to construct an article with a scope that does not appear in the sources themselves.The last part
in encyclopedias it is perfectly proper to have separate articles for each different definition of a term; unlike dictionaries, a single encyclopedia article covers a topic, not a term(which was copied from WP:RELART) is completely irrelevant since this is not about a term—what point were you trying to make? TompaDompa ( talk) 18:22, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
The article exists because there are very few animated films for List of films by box office admissions. List was devided because there are different type of animations. If you insists, we can just combine datas in one full list instead of them being separated in different categories. NextEditor123 ( talk) 18:51, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
We are talking about bigger numbers of box office admissions from bigger films. You can address your concerns on talk page in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film. NextEditor123 ( talk) 19:29, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I playing on moving this page in 48H if there any last changes go ahead and make it. Fanoflionking 12:35, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
This is an unnecessary WP:CONTENTFORK of List of films by box office admissions with a slightly more narrow scope. I propose redirecting this to the main topic. I did so WP:BOLDLY some time ago, and it was reverted with the rationale "Not without discussing first", so I'm formally suggesting it here. TompaDompa ( talk) 19:21, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
WP:RELART. Of course, that's not what a related article is. The scope of this article is a proper subset of the scope of List of films by box office admissions. This is just an arbitrary (thinner) slicing of the data, and Wikipedia is not a box office database. TompaDompa ( talk) 17:38, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Since when you became the only man who can decide if movies' datas should be put or not in Wikipedia? The article of box office admissions for animated films is needed because there are very few of them that can be included in List of films by box office admissions. It was not about Wikipedia being box office database or not. It was about removing the whole data of this article entirely without any discussions (and there are several users who disagree with you). It can be considered a related article WP:RELART because both articles related but different topics (animation). This does not make either of the two articles a content fork. Further, in encyclopedias it is perfectly proper to have separate articles for each different definition of a term; unlike dictionaries, a single encyclopedia article covers a topic, not a term. NextEditor123 ( talk) 18:10, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
related but differenttopic but a subtopic of films. That makes this a WP:CONTENTFORK. You have arbitrarily decided to slice the data this way, with no justification presented why this subtopic should warrant a separate article—do the sources rank animated films by box office admissions with these divisions into traditional, computer, and stop-motion animated films? If not, assembling the data like this is producing novel content—which is of course not allowed per Wikipedia policy. You can't just trawl the sources for the data that would be needed to construct an article with a scope that does not appear in the sources themselves.The last part
in encyclopedias it is perfectly proper to have separate articles for each different definition of a term; unlike dictionaries, a single encyclopedia article covers a topic, not a term(which was copied from WP:RELART) is completely irrelevant since this is not about a term—what point were you trying to make? TompaDompa ( talk) 18:22, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
The article exists because there are very few animated films for List of films by box office admissions. List was devided because there are different type of animations. If you insists, we can just combine datas in one full list instead of them being separated in different categories. NextEditor123 ( talk) 18:51, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
We are talking about bigger numbers of box office admissions from bigger films. You can address your concerns on talk page in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film. NextEditor123 ( talk) 19:29, 20 June 2022 (UTC)