This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Basketball Association, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
NBA on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Basketball AssociationWikipedia:WikiProject National Basketball AssociationTemplate:WikiProject National Basketball AssociationNBA articles
There seems to be a mini edit war going on here over the format of the tables. Please discuss changes here before editing or reverting.
Dabomb87 (
talk)
00:03, 22 May 2009 (UTC)reply
I have something to say also. LOL is nothing but trouble because he says that I don't have a reason for my changes I make and I totally disagree with him. You shouldn't be telling people things like that because since December 2008, my work has been paid off and my slogan is; "If you don't like it, then leave it alone and get over it."
Infonerd2216 (
talk)
02:09, 22 May 2009 (UTC)Infonerd2216reply
Infonerd, nobody is discounting your opinions. Can you explain why you think your formatting of the table is superior to the previous version?
Dabomb87 (
talk)
02:11, 22 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Adding
"sortbottom" to the totals will make them unsortable. If we don't want to have the regular season and playoff totals sorted amongst themselves, then we can merge them into one row. —LOLT/C02:42, 22 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Look Dabomb87, I can discuss anything I want to say, so don't tell me what to discuss! And LOL, what the heck do you mean I need to add a reason for my changes. There is a user on Wikipedia and he doesn't explain a reason. So LOL, what you need to do is worry about your own work and I will worry about mine.
Infonerd2216 (
talk)
21:15, 22 May 2009 (UTC)Infonerd2216reply
(outdent) There is clear disagreement about the version of the table that should be used. Therefore, we need to discuss the issue.
Dabomb87 (
talk)
21:43, 22 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Blah Blah Blah! My word, you're boring me to death!
I have reverted back to the consensus version. If you revert to the previous version without further, you will be reported for edit warring.
Dabomb87 (
talk)
22:03, 22 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Infonerd, providing reasons for your changes during an edit conflict is part of the process of building
consensus. So far you've been dodging it every time we've asked for your explanation, so I will help restore the season-by-season tables to the format that has been approved by consensus. Your slogan, "If you don't like it, then leave it alone and get over it", would really fail to benefit Wikipedia because changes that worsen the quality of Wikipedia articles (e.g. vandalism, deletion of notable content) should most definitely be reverted. —LOLT/C22:39, 22 May 2009 (UTC)reply
An user keeps edit warring to claim that the Raptors finished in 10th during the 2022-23 season. No evidence has been provided to support this claim.
They finished in 9th in the regular season, and subsequently failed to clinch a playoff seed by losing in the play-in round. However, that does not retroactively change their regular finish any more than a team that finishes in first and loses in the first round still finished in first. Other points to prove this:
The NBA lists them as finishing in 9th on their website
NBA
The
2023 NBA draft had Chicago draft ahead of Toronto since they finished lower.
In the absence of any sources to support the claim that Toronto finished 10th, Wikipedia should not be attempting to rewrite history.
TDL (
talk)
19:48, 6 July 2024 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Basketball Association, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
NBA on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Basketball AssociationWikipedia:WikiProject National Basketball AssociationTemplate:WikiProject National Basketball AssociationNBA articles
There seems to be a mini edit war going on here over the format of the tables. Please discuss changes here before editing or reverting.
Dabomb87 (
talk)
00:03, 22 May 2009 (UTC)reply
I have something to say also. LOL is nothing but trouble because he says that I don't have a reason for my changes I make and I totally disagree with him. You shouldn't be telling people things like that because since December 2008, my work has been paid off and my slogan is; "If you don't like it, then leave it alone and get over it."
Infonerd2216 (
talk)
02:09, 22 May 2009 (UTC)Infonerd2216reply
Infonerd, nobody is discounting your opinions. Can you explain why you think your formatting of the table is superior to the previous version?
Dabomb87 (
talk)
02:11, 22 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Adding
"sortbottom" to the totals will make them unsortable. If we don't want to have the regular season and playoff totals sorted amongst themselves, then we can merge them into one row. —LOLT/C02:42, 22 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Look Dabomb87, I can discuss anything I want to say, so don't tell me what to discuss! And LOL, what the heck do you mean I need to add a reason for my changes. There is a user on Wikipedia and he doesn't explain a reason. So LOL, what you need to do is worry about your own work and I will worry about mine.
Infonerd2216 (
talk)
21:15, 22 May 2009 (UTC)Infonerd2216reply
(outdent) There is clear disagreement about the version of the table that should be used. Therefore, we need to discuss the issue.
Dabomb87 (
talk)
21:43, 22 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Blah Blah Blah! My word, you're boring me to death!
I have reverted back to the consensus version. If you revert to the previous version without further, you will be reported for edit warring.
Dabomb87 (
talk)
22:03, 22 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Infonerd, providing reasons for your changes during an edit conflict is part of the process of building
consensus. So far you've been dodging it every time we've asked for your explanation, so I will help restore the season-by-season tables to the format that has been approved by consensus. Your slogan, "If you don't like it, then leave it alone and get over it", would really fail to benefit Wikipedia because changes that worsen the quality of Wikipedia articles (e.g. vandalism, deletion of notable content) should most definitely be reverted. —LOLT/C22:39, 22 May 2009 (UTC)reply
An user keeps edit warring to claim that the Raptors finished in 10th during the 2022-23 season. No evidence has been provided to support this claim.
They finished in 9th in the regular season, and subsequently failed to clinch a playoff seed by losing in the play-in round. However, that does not retroactively change their regular finish any more than a team that finishes in first and loses in the first round still finished in first. Other points to prove this:
The NBA lists them as finishing in 9th on their website
NBA
The
2023 NBA draft had Chicago draft ahead of Toronto since they finished lower.
In the absence of any sources to support the claim that Toronto finished 10th, Wikipedia should not be attempting to rewrite history.
TDL (
talk)
19:48, 6 July 2024 (UTC)reply