![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
As of the date of this writing the infobox says "| num_episodes = 71 (and 3 specials)."
When I search for "specials" I get one hit. When I search for "special" I get 23 hits; when I search for "specials " I get 17 hits.
There should be a way to readily and easily identify the "3 specials" referenced in the in num_episodes field. Changing formatting would make them stand out on the page, but not help with a search. Should we change the template? Should we split the table--create a new table just for the "specials"?
Anyone else have any thoughts on this?
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
As of the date of this writing the infobox says "| num_episodes = 71 (and 3 specials)."
When I search for "specials" I get one hit. When I search for "special" I get 23 hits; when I search for "specials " I get 17 hits.
There should be a way to readily and easily identify the "3 specials" referenced in the in num_episodes field. Changing formatting would make them stand out on the page, but not help with a search. Should we change the template? Should we split the table--create a new table just for the "specials"?
Anyone else have any thoughts on this?